Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korean threat activates shield U.S. cites a launch as 'provocative'
Drudgereport.com ^ | June 19,2006 | Drudge Report / Bill Gertz

Posted on 06/19/2006 8:47:38 PM PDT by edpc

The Pentagon activated its new U.S. ground-based interceptor missile defense system, Bill Gertz reports in Tuesday's WASHINGTON TIMES, just as officials announced that any long-range missile launch by North Korea would be considered a "provocative act."

Poor weather conditions above where the missile site was located by U.S. intelligence satellites indicates that an immediate launch is unlikely, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

However, intelligence officials said preparations have advanced to the point where a launch could take place within several days to a month.

Two Navy Aegis warships are patrolling near North Korea as part of the global missile defense and would be among the first sensors that would trigger the use of interceptors, the officials said yesterday.

Gertz reports: The U.S. missile defense system includes 11 long-range interceptor missiles, including nine deployed at Fort Greeley, Alaska, and two at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif. The system was switched from test to operational mode within the past two weeks, the officials said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Alaska; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; fortgreeley; gertz; missiledefense; northkorea; proliferation; vandenbergafb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
This should be interesting.
1 posted on 06/19/2006 8:47:41 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edpc

I'd like to see us knock the thing out of the sky as soon as it is launched.


2 posted on 06/19/2006 8:49:48 PM PDT by freakboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

I say we try them out


3 posted on 06/19/2006 8:50:34 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

It will be very interesting, can't wait to see it


4 posted on 06/19/2006 8:51:23 PM PDT by rhainw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freakboy
"I'd like to see us knock the thing out of the sky as soon as it is launched."

That depends upon the trajectory.

After all, our anti-missile assets are not in position to knock down a missile inbound for Beijing from North Korea!

5 posted on 06/19/2006 8:51:30 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Veeeeeeeeeery interesting. Colonel Hunt said on Fox today that if we shoot it down, it means war.


6 posted on 06/19/2006 8:52:55 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Shoot it down in a "test" of our own. Can't afford to take the risk, and it would send a clear message to any belligerent/rogue state.


7 posted on 06/19/2006 8:54:32 PM PDT by Jeff Head (God, family, country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
What an opportunity for a proof of concept shot. Providing it is successful respect for thr good old US will expand.
8 posted on 06/19/2006 8:54:32 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

We are already at war with North Korea.


9 posted on 06/19/2006 8:54:40 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
Yea, but it would really be embarrassing if we miss.
10 posted on 06/19/2006 8:55:25 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"Veeeeeeeeeery interesting. Colonel Hunt said on Fox today that if we shoot it down, it means war."

We are still 'officially' at war with NK.

11 posted on 06/19/2006 8:56:50 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; All

I saw that, as well. I guess that all depends on how we destroy it. If it's blown away in the missile's terminal phase, it shouldn't be over any disputed territory. It was on its way down, anyway. I'd just tell them that and add, "You were doing a test. So were we. Thanks for the joint exercise."


12 posted on 06/19/2006 8:57:27 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

We'd never hear about it in that case.


13 posted on 06/19/2006 8:58:40 PM PDT by Philistone (Turning lead into gold...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edpc
"Two Navy Aegis warships are patrolling near North Korea as part of the global missile defense and would be among the first sensors that would trigger the use of interceptors, the officials said yesterday."

Notice that this didn't say US Navy. I read yesterday that the Japanese had to Aegis destroyers out off the coast and said that if the missile were launched, they'd shoot it down. Can an Aegis bring that thing down?

14 posted on 06/19/2006 9:00:24 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

bump


15 posted on 06/19/2006 9:01:58 PM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion have been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

One of the generals on Fox news said that if we knock it down, it would be an instant war...not sure I agree with him.


16 posted on 06/19/2006 9:02:26 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc; bnelson44; blam

That's right, thanks for the correction. His words not mine. I'm sure he meant that it'd be the end of the armistice.


17 posted on 06/19/2006 9:02:52 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

Yes it can. Go to www.mda.mil and check it out. Lots of information on the various stages in which the missile can be intercepted. The Aegis can take it in the Mid Course or Terminal Phases.


18 posted on 06/19/2006 9:04:18 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

And if we don't? How will Kim know it was not another design failure if we do. I doubt if they have a RADAR that is sophisticated enough to tell what happened to it.


19 posted on 06/19/2006 9:04:32 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freakboy

Or before!;)


20 posted on 06/19/2006 9:07:25 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson