Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush gives Iran an ultimatum on uranium
AP ^ | 6/19/06 | DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 06/19/2006 7:56:19 PM PDT by Flavius

KINGS POINT, N.Y. - President Bush told Iran on Monday that nations worldwide won't back down from their demand that Tehran suspend uranium enrichment.

"Iran's leaders have a clear choice. We hope they will accept our offer and voluntarily suspend these activities so we can work out an agreement that will bring Iran real benefits," Bush said a day before leaving for Vienna, Austria, where he will talk with European Union officials who are leading efforts to resolve the nuclear dispute.

If Iran's leaders reject the offer, they will face action before the U.N. Security Council and progressively stronger political and economic sanctions, Bush said during a commencement speech at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy.

Bush discussed Iran with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday during an 18-minute phone call Putin placed to Bush. "The presidents agreed on the importance of remaining united in their efforts to press Iran to suspend all enrichment activities and begin negotiations on the incentives package," said Kate Starr, a spokeswoman for the National Security Council.

On Sunday, Iran accused the United States of trying to sway European nations from a possible compromise. The Iranian foreign ministry said U.S. insistence that negotiations be conditioned on Tehran's suspension of uranium enrichment has narrowed the scope of possible solutions, and made it more difficult for all parties to reach an accord.

Bush made it clear he would not budge. He said allowing Iran to enrich uranium, a process that can make nuclear fuel for a power plant or fissile material for an atomic bomb, would present a grave threat to the world.

"The United States has offered to come to the table with our partners and meet with Iran's representatives as soon as the Iranian regime fully and verifiably suspends its uranium enrichment and reprocessing activities," Bush said. "I have a message for the Iranian regime: America and our partners are united. We have presented a reasonable offer. Iran's leaders should see our proposal for what it is — a historic opportunity to set their country on a better course."

On June 6, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana presented a package of rewards and possible penalties to Iran. The package was drawn up by the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — the United States, Britain, China, France and Russia — and Germany.

The package calls on Iran to suspend, not permanently halt, uranium enrichment as a condition for the start of talks, although the negotiations are aimed at getting Iran to agree to a long-term moratorium on such activity.

Iran says enriching uranium is its country's right. Iranian officials say they are reviewing the package and will propose amendments.

Bush is the first American president to address a graduating class at the academy. He spoke there at the request of former White House chief of staff, Andrew Card, who briefly studied there in the 1960s and hitched a ride on Air Force One to share the stage with the president.

"When he was a plebe, he was stuffed in a duffel bag and run up the flagpole," Bush said about his former chief of staff who left the school when he married.

The U.S. Merchant Marine Academy was created following a 1934 fire in which 134 people died aboard the passenger ship Morro Castle. Congress acknowledged the need for maritime-training standards and passed the Merchant Marine Act that created the academy in 1936. President Franklin D. Roosevelt dedicated the school in 1943 in Kings Point.

Kings Point graduates work as deck officers aboard container ships, oil tankers, passenger cruise ships and other vessels. Others remain on land and have become engineers in shipbuilding companies and work in a variety of port operations, including security, while some opt for military careers. Since the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the academy has played a leading role in developing international training standards for maritime security.

"From this campus, every man and woman could see the black smoke rising from the Twin Towers," Bush said. "Within hours, your midshipmen were working side-by-side with the Coast Guard and Marine division of the New York City Fire Department," Bush told the midshipmen seated on a sunny football field at the academy outside New York City.

"Over the next nine days, you moved firefighters and police and emergency response teams into ground zero. You moved tons of food and water supplies. The heroic response to that terrible day showed the spirit of America, and the spirit of this fine academy."

___

Associated Press writer Frank Eltman in Kings Point, N.Y., contributed to this report.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; irannukes; nuclear; proliferation; russia; swasia; usmma

1 posted on 06/19/2006 7:56:21 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Graaaaah! There should be NO carrots in this package! Sticks only! Iran is NOT to be rewarded for seeking uranium enrichment and then backing down!


2 posted on 06/19/2006 7:57:19 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Yo, Iran, *insert your favorite curse word,* with me
3 posted on 06/19/2006 7:57:28 PM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
If Iran's leaders reject the offer, they will face action before the U.N. Security Council...

Another letter.

4 posted on 06/19/2006 7:59:40 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

I think carrots are important. You have to realize that Iran won't accept any pre-conditions... think about it... we offer Iran a way out, knowing they will say no... ;)


5 posted on 06/19/2006 7:59:53 PM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I saw a liberal poster on a Tom Clancy usenet group try to draw an equivalence between Iran having nuclear weapons and the possession of nukes by the U.S.

He got slapped down hard.


6 posted on 06/19/2006 8:01:56 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

What I'm worried about is the example set by giving nice things to Iran in exchange, essentially, for them rattling their sabres at us. It's extortion.


7 posted on 06/19/2006 8:03:05 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"I have a message for the Iranian regime: America and our partners are united. We have presented a reasonable offer."

8 posted on 06/19/2006 8:04:29 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
There should be NO carrots in this package! Sticks only! Iran is NOT to be rewarded for seeking uranium enrichment and then backing down!
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

they won't back down. They know they have a strategic advantage right now that necessitates they press the issue while we are dependent on oil, and extended in Iraq and Korea. don't think this Korean missile launch isn't a coordinated event. Also I would suspect some kind of terrorist activity to increase at the same time as they walk away from the table and await the toothless security council response to their rejection of the offer. The sanctions idea plays right into their hands. We have little that they need, they have a major trump card in the oil supply.
They know the tight world supply demand situation and won't risk waiting for the oil consumers to reduce dependency. If that were the case, they would suspend overt enrichment, come to the table and lie while they finished their business in secret. If we were going to destroy their capability, we would have had Israel do it already. The fact we have no stomach for an all out attack when it has the greatest chance for success, shows how vulnerable we actually are at this point. The axis of evil is putting the squeeze on and we haven't responded.
9 posted on 06/19/2006 8:27:13 PM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

The situation is getting very tight with Iran AND N Korea.


10 posted on 06/19/2006 8:31:18 PM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I'd be more blunt.

I'd blow up the missile on the North Korea launch pad right now, then cable the jackoff in Teheran two words: "You're next."


11 posted on 06/19/2006 8:32:09 PM PDT by exit82 (If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oolatec
I think carrots are important

Carrots are important. They are good for the eyes. The Iranians will need them to make out all the text in the ceasefire/surrender documentation they'll be handed if they continue playing this game.

12 posted on 06/19/2006 8:35:30 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

"The five day forecast in Tehran is three days!"


13 posted on 06/19/2006 8:42:31 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
We're offering to sell them reactors that can generate electric power but cannot be used for nuclear weapons without building an obviously large reprocessing facility and going through a very difficult technical process to produce weapons-grade plutonium. So if Iran rejects this offer to give up uranium enrichment, the most plausible reason for such a rejection would be that Iran wants more than civilian nuclear power and actually wants to do enrichment on a massive scale to produce weapons-grade Uranium. So rejection of this offer would essentially be an admission that Iran's goal is to build nuclear weapons. By this offer, we've taken away their claim that we're trying to deny them the peaceful use of nuclear energy and turned rejection of this offer into an admission of a nuclear weapons program.

I'm not a nuclear scientist, but based on my understanding of this issue, it looks like the West has made a very smart strategic move with this latest offer to Iran.

14 posted on 06/19/2006 8:43:58 PM PDT by defenderSD (Just when you think it's never going to happen, that's when it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: edpc
No they aren't! Snope'd!
15 posted on 06/19/2006 8:54:05 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
Killjoy....have you ever seen a rabbit with glasses?

;-P

16 posted on 06/19/2006 9:00:56 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Ahh, that makes sense. Cool, I like this move then. ^_^


17 posted on 06/19/2006 9:02:29 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

Funny! Zappa nod...


18 posted on 06/19/2006 9:36:57 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: karnage

Many thanks!


19 posted on 06/19/2006 10:25:05 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
This latest offer does look like a smart strategic move. But if Iran accepts this offer we will be giving them the ability to produce Plutonium in the future and we had better have a viable long-term contingency plan to deal with the situation if they kick out the IAEA and foreign technicians and then attempt to reprocess the plutonium into weapons-grade plutonium. We need a infallible contingency plan to stop them from producing weapons-grade plutonium if that situation occurs. I would assume the Pentagon has a plan to deal with that situation.
20 posted on 07/26/2006 4:02:03 PM PDT by carl in alaska ("You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed." - Mt 24:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson