Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pardon talk for Libby begins
Newsday ^ | June 19, 2006 | TOM BRUNE

Posted on 06/17/2006 11:10:30 PM PDT by RWR8189

WASHINGTON -- Now that top White House aide Karl Rove is off the hook in the CIA leak probe, President George W. Bush must weigh whether to pardon former vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the only one indicted in the three-year investigation.

Speculation about a pardon began in late October, soon after Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald unsealed the perjury indictment of Libby, and it continued last week after Fitzgerald chose not to charge Rove.

"I think ultimately, of course, there are going to be pardons," said Joseph diGenova, a former prosecutor and an old Washington hand who shares that view with many pundits.

"These are the kinds of cases in which historically presidents have given pardons," said the veteran Republican attorney.

The White House remains mum on the president's intentions. Spokeswoman Dana Perino declined to comment Friday.

Bush has powerful incentives to pardon Libby, however. They range from rewarding past loyalty to ending the awkward revelations emerging from pretrial motions, a flow that could worsen in his trial next year.

Libby was indicted for lying in Fitzgerald's probe into who in the administration leaked the identity of covert CIA officer Valerie Plame to reporters in 2003, apparently to undercut her husband's attack on Bush's war-justifying claim that Iraq sought uranium in Niger.

By demanding sensitive, sometimes embarrassing materials, some say, Libby appears to be goading the White House into issuing a pardon. Libby's spokeswoman did not respond to questions about a pardon.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; cialeak; dcjury; indictment; karlrove; libby; pardon; rove; scooterlibby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: monkapotamus

Why pardon someone if they haven't been found guilty of anything?

Oh, sorry.


61 posted on 06/18/2006 5:38:03 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

I am not familiar with Libby's exact relationship with Mr. Rich. Are you, and if so what is it?


62 posted on 06/18/2006 7:24:05 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Why pardon someone if they haven't been found guilty of anything?
In the aftermath of Nixon's resignation the Democrats would have conducted a show trial against him and thrown him in jail to humiliate Republican voters. Exactly as they dreamed of doing with Karl Rove.

63 posted on 06/19/2006 6:34:38 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: onyx

"I have NO faith in DC juries."

Neither do I. See my sig line.


64 posted on 06/19/2006 2:55:07 PM PDT by Purrcival (Zsa Zsa Gabor couldn't slap a cop and get away with it. But Cynthia McKinney...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson