Skip to comments.
Pardon talk for Libby begins
Newsday ^
 | June 19, 2006
 | TOM BRUNE
Posted on 06/17/2006 11:10:30 PM PDT by RWR8189
WASHINGTON -- Now that top White House aide Karl Rove is off the hook in the CIA leak probe, President George W. Bush must weigh whether to pardon former vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the only one indicted in the three-year investigation. 
Speculation about a pardon began in late October, soon after Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald unsealed the perjury indictment of Libby, and it continued last week after Fitzgerald chose not to charge Rove. 
"I think ultimately, of course, there are going to be pardons," said Joseph diGenova, a former prosecutor and an old Washington hand who shares that view with many pundits. 
"These are the kinds of cases in which historically presidents have given pardons," said the veteran Republican attorney. 
The White House remains mum on the president's intentions. Spokeswoman Dana Perino declined to comment Friday. 
Bush has powerful incentives to pardon Libby, however. They range from rewarding past loyalty to ending the awkward revelations emerging from pretrial motions, a flow that could worsen in his trial next year. 
Libby was indicted for lying in Fitzgerald's probe into who in the administration leaked the identity of covert CIA officer Valerie Plame to reporters in 2003, apparently to undercut her husband's attack on Bush's war-justifying claim that Iraq sought uranium in Niger. 
By demanding sensitive, sometimes embarrassing materials, some say, Libby appears to be goading the White House into issuing a pardon. Libby's spokeswoman did not respond to questions about a pardon.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; cialeak; dcjury; indictment; karlrove; libby; pardon; rove; scooterlibby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next  last
    
1
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:10:33 PM PDT
by 
RWR8189
 
To: RWR8189
    "'I think ultimately, of course, there are going to be pardons,' said Joseph diGenova..." Good!
 
To: Howlin
    Ping .. and welcome back, Howlin.
 
3
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:13:04 PM PDT
by 
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
 
To: RWR8189
    Heh... mere mention of this will have leftist heads exploding.
 
4
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:15:08 PM PDT
by 
kenth
 
To: kenth
    I'd rather an acquittal than a pardon - even more commie crania will rupture.
 
5
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:21:09 PM PDT
by 
karnage
 
To: RWR8189
    Can't claim to have followed it all but Joe Wilson is totally discredited; the whole thing is, as Shakespeare would say "Much Ado About Nothing", mostly about memories (hell, Hillary just said she could'nt remember anything when her turn came up in various probes), so a pardon would neatly terminate this distraction, including Uncle Sam paying Libby's lawyer fees.
 
6
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:22:31 PM PDT
by 
1066AD
 
To: karnage
    The only way we will get acquitted is on appeal. He is a slam dunk for conviction in front of a DC jury.
7
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:22:47 PM PDT
by 
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
 
To: RWR8189
    I'd rather see Libby win his case and put and end to this mess once and for all. If pardoned, Libby will be the case the left trots out in the future to show corruption on the right. Beat the charges. End the leftist B.S. propaganda on this issue.
 
8
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:22:49 PM PDT
by 
DoughtyOne
(Hey Senators, what have you done with those Conservatives we sent to Congress? (CyberAnt Inspired))
 
To: RWR8189
    Bush has Negative incentives to let Fitzy and his co-conspirators slink away by pardoning Libby. if Libby were pardoned, the Fitz fornicators could claim Bush had to do it to cover his rear. By sending everything through the appropriate processes Fitzy and the Plaming liberals get a broken arm and a bloody nose. This is desperate wishful thinking on ScrewsDay's part.
9
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:23:25 PM PDT
by 
MrEdd
(I would have gotten away with it too - if it weren't for those meddling kids and their stupid dog.)
 
To: DoughtyOne
    See my post above yours. He WILL be convicted in front of a DC jury but it has a good chance of being over turned on appeal.
 
10
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:24:19 PM PDT
by 
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
 
To: kenth; RWR8189; STARWISE; Howlin; monkapotamus; karnage; 1066AD
To: STARWISE
     
I have NO faith in DC juries.
 
12
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:26:56 PM PDT
by 
onyx
(Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
 
To: onyx
13
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:29:32 PM PDT
by 
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
 
To: RWR8189
    ?Penalty less or more than Sandy Berger got??
 
14
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:31:00 PM PDT
by 
hocndoc
(http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
 
To: onyx
    I can't think of one Republican that has ever been found not guilty in a DC court. That includes all of the Iran/Contra figures and Watergate "conspirators".
15
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:31:35 PM PDT
by 
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
 
To: Texasforever
    Well he may be convicted if it goes that far. Fitz has a penchant for the old continuance without a finding play. Even a plea deal is not out of the question. Who cares now. In the eyes of many , they have already bungled the case. They did not get rove or Chaney , and no one cares about a scooter. This is already over.
16
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:31:36 PM PDT
by 
fantom
 
To: fantom
    Not for Libby though. Just remember he has a law license he will lose not to mention crippling legal bills.
17
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:32:57 PM PDT
by 
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
 
To: RWR8189
    Don't you need a conviction before getting a pardon ?
 
18
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:36:39 PM PDT
by 
Rumple4
 
To: Rumple4
    Dick Nixon got pardoned before there were even charges.
 
19
posted on 
06/17/2006 11:38:34 PM PDT
by 
RWR8189
(George Allen for President)
 
To: RWR8189
    Can President Bush Pardon his (Libby) accusers?
  
 It is what he would do.
  
 TT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson