Skip to comments.
Breaking: N Koreans Ordered To Raise Their Flag At 2PM (1 AM EDT), and Listen to Broadcast
Yonhap News (via Naver.com) ^
| 06/18/06
| Shin Ji-hong
Posted on 06/17/2006 6:15:31 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,421-1,435 next last
To: Diogenesis
"Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure......"
To: Howlin
Oh, lord; are we going to be up late tonight? :-) LOL -- are we? I sure hope not.
62
posted on
06/17/2006 6:41:37 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
To: KC Burke
NK has been known to stage a grand head-fake before. May your son and our forces remain vigilant. Hopefully the NK's will be dissuaded from this lunacy.
To: Williams
No politican living today (including G.W.) has the guts to launch a nuke.
64
posted on
06/17/2006 6:41:46 PM PDT
by
proudofthesouth
(Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
To: muawiyah
I felt the same way when watching "The Rock". Nerve gas the population center of SF, or see Nicholas Cage die. Neither happened, so the movie was a complete failure.
65
posted on
06/17/2006 6:42:10 PM PDT
by
jeremiah
(How much did we get for that rope?)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Think assymetric:
How about someone with a couple cleverly placed aligator clips and an iPod, arranges at precisely the appointed time ... an official looking spokesbabe appears, then announces to the entire population, the great leader is handing out free cheeseburgers - come and get them. :)
To: MindBender26
Aren't they testing their delivery system only?
67
posted on
06/17/2006 6:42:48 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
To: The Duke
I would just ask, (maybe I would give, but I would just ask) if south Korea would like some short range nukes, I would ask Japan if they would like some short range nukes, I would ask Taiwan if they would like some short range nukes. Then I will tell China that I will nuclearize parts of their border unless they get the puppet in North Korea under control.
68
posted on
06/17/2006 6:42:48 PM PDT
by
do the dhue
(I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Bruce Springsteen's eyes.)
To: Wiggins
If I had to wager, I would bet this is an unarmed ICBM test. But just think if they nuke a Japanese or American city and kill millions. Then I guess everyone will be certain we should have taken them out on the launch pad, at a minimum.
Free people should not have to wonder whether maniacal despots are going to kill millions of us. The N Korean threat should be eliminated. Letting N Korea have nukes and ICBM's has always been unacceptable.
69
posted on
06/17/2006 6:42:52 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: TigerLikesRooster
It is 10:16am in S. Korea now. Less than 4 hours to go. Ok, plenty of time to stockpile more gold, guns, MRE's, vacuum and dust the bomb shelter...
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did you translate this yourself, or was it auto-translated?
71
posted on
06/17/2006 6:43:28 PM PDT
by
Excellence
(Since November 6, 1998)
To: TigerLikesRooster
From
Shutting Down Hostile ICBMs (MILITARY TECH)
While the war on terror has been grabbing a lot of public attention, the United States has quietly been in the process of neutralizing the missile arsenals of China, North Korea, and even Iran. This is probably one of the most important stories concerning the strategic balance, yet one of the least covered.
Prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States withdrew from the ABM Treaty (which it had signed with Russia in 1972), and began development of a national missile defense system. Research into missile defense had begun in earnest in 1983, but after withdrawing from the ABM Treaty, deployment was possible and became a priority.
The first phase of this deployment has covered the Pacific Rim, specifically with an eye towards neutralizing China's ICBM force. This is understandable, since on two occasions, Chinese generals have been quoted as having threatened to use nuclear weapons against the United States. The Chinese ICBM and SLBM forces are both very small (24 DF-5 ICBMs and 24 JL-1 SLBMs total). China's future plans for their SLBM force will center around two Jin-class SSBNs (the Type 094), each with 16 JL-2 SLBMs. China hopes to get as many as 60 ICBMs by 2010.
Dealing with the Chinese SSBNs is easy. American SSNs probably wait off the coast of China, and trail Chinese subs. This was the routine with Russian subs during the Cold War, and the Americans are pretty good at this sort of thing. If hostilities with China start, their SSBNs are likely to have an exciting wartime career short and exciting. The ICBMs are a slightly different matter. The United States is deploying two clusters of ground-based interceptors, at Fort Greeley in Alaska (at least eight interceptors deployed) and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California (at least two interceptors deployed). Deployment of the interceptors is ongoing.
The North Korean missile threat is somewhat more different, and easier to deal with. Japan and the United States are both fielding the SM-3 missile, which has already proven it can intercept incoming ballistic missiles. The SM-2, also in use by both the U.S. Navy and the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force, recently carried out a successful intercept of a ballistic missile in the terminal phase. Both Japan and the United States also use land-based Patriot PAC-3 missiles. The result is a multi-layered system that will be able to blunt any North Korean attack.
Plans to counter the Iranian missile threat are also in motion. The United States is already looking into sites in Poland and the Czech Republic for a cluster ground-based interceptors. The SM-3 and SM-2 could also be used from naval vessels in the Persian Gulf. The United States and Israel both use Patriot, and the Israelis also have the Arrow anti-ballistic missile in service.
These systems are not at the point where they can stop every inbound missile. The thing is, they still provide a deterrent against launching attacks because a country that does decide to launch missiles at the United States or any of its allies protected by a missile defense shield will not know which of its missiles will fail to reach their targets. This uncertainty increases as the United States continues to deploy more ground-based interceptors, and looks into more systems. Ultimately, the uncertainty about the success of an attack created by the deployment of missile defense systems combined with the certainty that an attempted attack will bring a response, will be one of the biggest reasons for a country to decide not to push the button.
Harold C. Hutchison
72
posted on
06/17/2006 6:43:57 PM PDT
by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Riley
Okay, going on record predicting that they're going to try to orbit a satellite. Me too.
73
posted on
06/17/2006 6:43:59 PM PDT
by
nevergiveup
(Locals say "puh-TUCK-it")
To: kittymyrib
Reagan's legacy is still underappreciated; and it's still shielding the free world.
74
posted on
06/17/2006 6:44:10 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: RandallFlagg
No clue. But any breaking news from N Korea makes my antennae spring up.So you're worried and I'm worried, too; let's be worried together........LOL.
75
posted on
06/17/2006 6:44:17 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Pre-emptive strikes by USAF fighter jets... For tonight, I'll settle for USAF fighter jets escorting our RC-135s -- just in case the launch prep is a diversion, and they're planning to pick some low-hanging fruit to whip up the home folks. They've been unusually strident lately in their blathering and threats concerning our recon flights...
76
posted on
06/17/2006 6:44:51 PM PDT
by
umbagi
(Monthly Donor [entry level])
To: TigerLikesRooster
ummm.. i don't understand all the squiggly marks. Anyone have an English translation link?
To: proudofthesouth
Democrats will scream if he does and they'll scream if something bad happens and Bush didn't. Bush has done a pretty good job of ignoring Democrat and MSM caterwauling.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Wild stuff, TKL. Looks like they're going to go through with the missile test. What's the weather like in Korea at the moment? Looking clear for a launch? I don't even know if that would matter with an ICBM.
Domestic propaganda value aside, why broadcast this to the people? Whatever is said to them to get the masses fired up will only infuriate the Japanese, worry the South Koreans, and concern the Chinese. They don't seem to be pretending that this is another 'satellite launch' like last time. This looks like straight saber rattling.
79
posted on
06/17/2006 6:45:36 PM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
To: cripplecreek
80
posted on
06/17/2006 6:45:42 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,421-1,435 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson