Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom
>> And the lie Coulter told was??? <<

To paraphrase Ann's rant: ROBERTS IS ANOTHER SOUTER I TELL YOU!! HE'S A STEALTH LIBERAL AND BUSH KNOWS IT!!! BUSH ONLY NOMINATED ROBERTS BECAUSE HE HATES CONSERATIVES!!!

How's that for starters?

Here are some exact Coulter quotes that have been proven false, BTW:

* "Want an great example of liberal bias? Katie Couric once called Ronald Reagan 'an airhead.' while hosting the Today show" [No such incident ever occured. Coulter later retracted this statement in a later edition of her book]

* "Canada needs us. They'd better hope the United States doesn't roll over one night and crush them Canada used to be our good ally because they did everything we wanted them to do, specifically sending their people to fight our wars. Canada sent troops to Vietnam." [False]

* "New York Times columnist Frank Rich, in the wake of 9/11, wrote a column that demanded that Attorney General John Ashcroft "stop monkeying around with Muslim terrorists and concentrate on anti-abortion extremists." [Completely made up by Coulter. Rich did no such thing.]

* "The Confederacy had nothing to do with race. It stands for a romantic image of a chivalric, honor-based culture that was driven down by the brute force of crass Yankee capitalism, which was better at manufacturing weapons than using them, and that shortly thereafter gave us the Grant administration and the Gilded Age." [bear in mind Ann Coulter is allegedly a lifelong resident "of Connecicut" and is other speeches claims she's proud of the GOP for ending slavery. Yet her she claims the civil war had nothing to do with race conditions. Another time she suggested the enamicipation proclaimation should be repealed. Make up your mind, Ann.]

* "Jeffords supported Clinton's tax hike, and opposed the younger Bush's tax cut." [Wrong and wrong. He voted against Clinton's tax hike (as did all Republicans), and he voted for Bush's tax cut right before switching parties.]

* Coulter has stated that women are "not as bright" as men" and "have no capacity to understand how money is earned"

Ann Coulter fans and Michael Moore fans both suffer from personality cult worship so much that they will overlook any idiotic false thing their hero spews since they agree with the "message". The Coulterheads and Moore-ons may be idelogical opposites but they are flip sides of the same coin.

52 posted on 06/16/2006 6:23:58 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Judy Baar is Too-pinka! Vote Stufflebeam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy
Katie Couric got into a spat this morning (Wednesday, June 26) on Today with author Ann Coulter who accurately quoted Couric as having opened Today one morning back in 1999: “Good morning. The Gipper was an airhead. That's one of the conclusions of a new biography of Ronald Reagan that's drawing a tremendous amount of interest and fire today, Monday, September the 27th, 1999."

     Couric took umbrage at how Coulter, author of the new book, Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, had suggested that “I'm a Ronald Reagan basher" when, Couric maintained, she was very tough on the author of the “airhead” characterization, Edmund Morris. Couric demanded: "You used me as an example of liberal bias against Ronald Reagan. And I'm just curious why you took it so out of context?"

     Couric failed to note that she didn’t interview Morris until two days after she opened with the “airhead” insult. That aired on Monday, September 27, 1999. Morris didn’t appear on Today until Wednesday, September 29. For a full rundown of the interview: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/1999/cyb19990930.asp#3

     Of course, Couric’s bias came in choosing that most derisive characterization as the one to herald at the top of the show, especially when she dropped the word Morris had preceded it with: “apparent.” And, as Coulter explained, Morris wrote that he soon realized that Reagan was far from an airhead.

     When Coulter contended that Today had trumpeted the “airhead” charge on three different mornings, Couric countered: "No it was just one day and we'll get the transcripts for you.”

Katie Couric & Ann Coulter
Katie Couric argued with Ann Coulter for suggesting bias in Couric opening Today by trumpeting how an author called Reagan "an airhead"

     In fact, as reported in the September 29, 1999 CyberAlert, Today opened with the “airhead” terminology on two different mornings. First, Couric used it on Monday, September 27, 1999 as quoted at the top of this item. Second, here’s how Matt Lauer began the broadcast the next day: “Good morning. For the first time President Bush is responding to the controversial new biography of Ronald Reagan. And in particular the author's assertion that Reagan was a great President but an airhead."
     George H.W. Bush: "And it's brutal and grossly unfair and untrue.”
     Lauer: “And Mr. Bush has more to say today, Tuesday, September 28th, 1999.”

     MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens took down the exchange from today’s Today, June 26, which Today did not air until the 9:30am half hour, a very unusual time for a serious subject. Today followed Coulter with a segment on cooking fish.

     Couric set up the interview: "She's been called everything from a 'pundit-extraordinaire,' to 'a right-wing tele-bimbo,' but one thing Ann Coulter has not been called is understated. In her latest book, Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, the controversial author takes on big media, big government and most of all liberals. Ann Coulter, good morning nice to see you."

     After asking Coulter "What are some of the big liberal lies that are out there in your estimation?", Couric got to herself: "I think I do have to bring up a section of the book where you talk specifically about me and this is not where you call me the 'Eva Braun of liberalism,' which I'll ask you about."
     Coulter: "Affable."
     Couric: "'The affable,' oh thanks that makes me feel so much better. But you talk about the, the media bias against Ronald Reagan and you use a quote in open from the Today show where we say, 'An airhead, Ronald Reagan is an airhead.' And we're quoting Edmund Morris. But frankly in the book you make it sound as if I was saying that rather than Edmund Morris. And I guess one of your problems is with, even using that, is that he said he was an, 'apparent airhead,' and we failed to say, 'apparent airhead.' And during the course of the interview with Edmund Morris I really conducted an extremely challenging interview with him because he did eviscerate Ronald Reagan in his book. It was a very, very unflattering portrayal. The Reagans were very unhappy with it, conservatives were very unhappy with it. Afterwards Edmund Morris was unhappy with the interview and Nancy Reagan called to thank me for my line of questioning. So I'm just wondering how that jibes with your contention that somehow I'm a Ronald Reagan basher?"
     Coulter: "Well I didn't call you a 'Ronald Reagan basher,' I said, which is true that the Today show-"
     Couric: "Well you used me as an example of liberal bias against Ronald Reagan. And I'm just curious why you took it so out of context?"
     Coulter: "Well I don't think I did, you're taking it out of context."
     Couric: "No, I'm not."
     Coulter: "What I said was, which is true, that the Today show opened, I believe it was three days in a row, with the announcement: 'Ronald Reagan was an airhead, that's the conclusion of this new book by Edmund Morris.' When Edmund Morris came on for that interview with you he described that as a grossly unfair characterization of his points-"
     Couric: "Well we should also point out-"
     Coulter: "His entire book was contradicting that. So when the author himself and George Bush, the Vice President was interviewed about this, all say that, that was a grossly unfair characterization..."
     Couric as both talk over each other: "Right and-"
     Coulter: "...well then whose characterization was it?"
     Couric: "And that's in, that's-"
     Coulter: "It wasn't Edmund Morris's he certainly denies it."
     Couric: "Well actually he backpedaled considerably. If you had read the book by Edmund Morris-"
     Coulter: "I did."
     Couric: "...you would have seen that he was extremely critical of Ronald Reagan in the book."
     Coulter: "No, I didn't like the book but he didn't call him an airhead. The Today show called him an airhead."
     Couric: "He called him, 'an apparent airhead,' he did call him, 'an apparent airhead,' I have the quote right here if you would like me to read it?"
     Coulter: "No, I've, I've read the quote and it's in my book."
     Couric: "He said that, 'Young Kim Timmons-'"
     Coulter: "I don't think we are going to resolve this."
     Couric: "'...she of the blue-eyes and enchanting grace played occasional hooky from the White House speechwriting department to help me build a chronology and I was about hire a full-time assistant. Yet the magic of Geneva had faded. Dutch remained a mystery to me and worse still, dare I entertain such heresy in the hushed and reverent precincts of his office, an apparent airhead.' So these are Edmund Morris's words. But-"
     Coulter: "But was also in his words, though, when he came on your show was that, that was a grossly unfair characterization and then that was at the beginning of the book, he said he described him as 'an apparent airhead' on a very first meeting and that the entire course of the rest of his book was contradicting that. So for the Today show to be opening three days in a row, 'Ronald Reagan was an airhead,' I'm sorry that's dishonest."
     Couric: "It, it, it was one day. And also just for your information it was one day."
     Coulter correctly pointed out: "No, you said it one day, Matt Lauer said it another day."
     Couric falsely claimed: "No it was just one day and we'll get the transcripts for you. But anyway he also said, Edmund Morris, 'Beyond amazement I was distressed by the relentless banality not to say incoherence of the President's reprise in interviews.' So he did make these, he didn't really switch in the book. But we don't want to get too mired in this."
     Coulter: "Yes, by the way my book is not, not only solely not about this quote it is not solely about the Today show."

     But there’s certainly enough material so it could have been.

     If you pick up Coulter’s book, which is published by Crown, you’ll see quite a few familiar quotes which were, like the Couric and Lauer quotes above, first exposed in MRC publications, mainly CyberAlerts and Notable Quotables.

     Coulter’s acknowledgments page offers this credit:
“Novenas should be said to Brent Bozell and the Media Research Center, who have been on the case long before I was.”

     To see the book’s cover or to order it online:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1400046610/qid=1025037811/
sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-0178689-4179105

     Today has posted an excerpt from her book: http://msnbc.com/news/763069.asp?cp1=1

     [Web Update: NBC’s Today used the "airhead" term four times to describe Ronald Reagan. As Mickey Kaus noted in a July 8 "Kausfiles" posting on Slate.com, via a Nexis search he found the term employed "two days, three times (plus once on Later Today)." Today opened with it twice, as CyberAlert documented, but also employed the term two other times that week. Kaus explained: "Couric said it on Sept. 27, 1999. The next day, as charged, Lauer opened the show by talking about ‘the author's assertion that Reagan was a great President but an airhead.’ NBC's Jamie Gangel repeated the ‘airhead’ charge without the ‘apparent’ later that day in a Today interview with ex-President George H.W. Bush. The winner: Coulter on points. She was closer to the truth than Couric, who picked this particular fact fight and was wrong." For the Kaus piece: http://slate.msn.com/?id=2067592]

60 posted on 06/16/2006 6:30:36 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

Coulter: “Canada used to be one of our most loyal friends and vice-versa. I mean Canada sent troops to Vietnam - was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?”

McKeown interrupts: “Canada didn’t send troops to Vietnam.”

Coulter: “I don’t think that’s right.”

McKeown: “Canada did not send troops to Vietnam.”

Coulter (looking desperate): “Indochina?”

McKeown: “Uh no. Canada …second World War of course. Korea. Yes. Vietnam No.”

Coulter: “I think you’re wrong.”

McKeown: “No, took a pass on Vietnam.”

Coulter: “I think you’re wrong.”

McKeown: “No, Australia was there, not Canada.”

Coulter: “I think Canada sent troops.”

McKeown: “No.”

Coulter: “Well. I’ll get back to you on that.”


66 posted on 06/16/2006 6:34:13 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

Coulter Claim: The New York Times columnist Frank Rich "demanded that Ashcroft stop monkeying around with Muslim terrorists and concentrate on anti-abortion extremists." (p. 5)

Footnote: She cites an October 27, 2001 column in which Rich makes no such demands. He does chastise Ashcroft for not meeting with Planned Parenthood, which sought to offer tips on combating anthrax scares, based on its own experience with them.


68 posted on 06/16/2006 6:37:31 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
Canada's involvement in the Vietnam War

Larry Semeniuk of Windsor, Ontario, joined the US Army in January 1967. In December, he was deployed as a paratrooper of Company B, 3rd Battalion, 187th regiment, 101st Airborne Division to Vietnam. In January 1968, Semeniuk saved the life of an officer at the risk of his own. A few days later, he was killed in action. He was awarded the Silver Star posthumously.

Gary Butt was born May 9, 1951 in Montreal, Quebec. He enlisted in the US military at Plattsburg, New York in 1968. Since Butt had superior skills in marksmanship, the US Army gave him the position of rifleman with the 173rd Airborne Brigade. Butt volunteered for duty in Vietnam and served from July 1970, to April 1971. He was killed on April 3rd. At the time of his death, Butt held the position of sergeant with the 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade.

75 posted on 06/16/2006 6:40:31 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
POST #60 - PWN3D!!!

Go troll somewhere else.

84 posted on 06/16/2006 6:51:25 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (PENCE BASHERS WILL BE CALLED OUT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

"Coulter has stated that women are "not as bright" as men" and "have no capacity to understand how money is earned""

Only an idiot or a Soros/Moby employee would not realize that this is not a "lie" but humor.

Which are you?

Or do you think that cutting and pasting from Hate Coulter sites is presenting evidence?

Does Soros pay benefits? Or does he ride the backs of the workers?


85 posted on 06/16/2006 6:51:46 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

"The Confederacy had nothing to do with race."
"...claims the civil war had nothing to do with race conditions..." .

Partly true.


When the war started Lincoln himself said it was about preserving the Union and only,ONLY after several bloody battles in the middle of the war did it become about ending slavery and thus the Emancipation Proclaimation. Even that was illusionary because it only freed thoses slaves NOT in the Union(kentucky, Maryland and Deleware slaves remained slaves)

And until the 14th amend these slaves remained so. Even as the war ended.


112 posted on 06/16/2006 7:10:30 PM PDT by RedMonqey (Liberal Agenda : "You've got it, I want it, you owe me,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
* Coulter has stated that women are "not as bright" as men" and "have no capacity to understand how money is earned"

How is this false?

142 posted on 06/16/2006 7:36:46 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
Re: Your post 52...

Do you have chapter and verse for these quotes from Ann?

Cheers!

219 posted on 06/16/2006 9:58:20 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson