Ann said:
"Liberal refusal to accept any evidence that any person ever spied for the Soviet Union would be exasperating if it weren't so comical."
Ramsey said:
"So here I was, a non-liberal favorably reviewing a book that exposes a communist spy, and I am accused of "refusal to accept any evidence that any person ever spied for the Soviet Union."
So if Ramsey is by his own admission a non-liberal, then by definition she wasn't talking about him. Or else she got exasperated that Ramsey referred to the meeting as "entirely circumstantial" while ignoring the evidence of the cables. If he had said, "At the time of the meeting, it was circumstantial, but now we know better" Ann would probably have been more forgiving.
Cheers!
That is what he said. You can read the book review by clicking the link in #22, or see the excerpt I posted in #28.
I'll need to look at this post again in the morning.
Consider yourself bumped to the top.
I simply can't figure out here just what you are saying at this late hour for me.