Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US divided by superhighway plan
Scotsman ^ | June 16, 2006 | Craig Howie

Posted on 06/16/2006 10:20:30 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A MASSIVE road four football fields wide and running from Mexico to Canada through the heartland of the United States is being proposed amid controversy over security and the damage to the environment.

The "nation's most modern roadway", proposed between Laredo in Texas and Duluth, Minnesota, along Interstate 35, would allow the US to bypass the west coast ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to import goods from China and the Far East into the heart of middle America via Mexico, saving both cost and time.

However, critics argue that the ten-lane road would lay a swathe of concrete on top of an already over-developed transport infrastructure and further open the border with Mexico to illegal immigrants or terrorists.

According to a weekly Conservative magazine published in the US, the US administration is "quietly yet systematically" planning the massive highway, citing as a benefit that it would negate the power of two unions, the Longshoremen and Teamsters.

Another source claimed the highway was a "bi-partisan effort" with support from both Republicans and Democrats that would reduce freight transport times across the nation by days.

Under the plan - believed to be an extension of a strategic transportation plan signed in March last year by the US president, George Bush, Paul Martin, the then prime minister of Canada, and Vincente Fox, the Mexican president - imported goods would pass a border "road bump" in the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, before being loaded on to lorries for a straight run to a major hub, or "SmartPort", in Kansas, Oklahoma.

Border guards and customs officers would check the electronic security tags of lorries and their holds at a £1.6 million facility being built in Kansas City, before sending them on to the road network that links the US cities of Chicago, Minneapolis and Detroit with Ottawa, Winnipeg and Vancouver across the Canadian border.

Rail tracks and pipelines for oil and natural gas would run alongside the road.

Following the release of a 4,000-page environmental study, construction of the first leg of the Trans-Texas Corridor is reportedly due to begin next year, backed by US state and governmental agencies and a Spanish private sector company, Concessions de Infraestructuras de Transporte.

Tiffany Melvin, the executive director of Nasco, a non-profit organisation which has received £1.4 million from the US Department of Transport to study the proposal, said: "We're working on developing the existing system; these highways were developed in the 1950s and we have number of different programmes we're working on to provide alternative fuels and improve safety and security issues.

"We get comments that we are working to bring in terrorists and drug dealers, but this is simply not true.

"This is a bi-partisan effort that will ultimately improve our transportation infrastructure.

"Trade with China is increasing greatly, and the costs of our transportation system are ultimately born by the consumer.

"We do offer links to Canada and Mexico, but we are working on the trade competitiveness of America. We are planning for the future."

Eric Olson, the transportation spokesmen for the California-based Sierra Club, a national environmental awareness organisation, said the road would cause significant damage.

"Something on that scale would have a massive environmental impact," he said.

"Building a large-scale new highway does not seem like the best solution.

"There is a great need for fixing our existing roads and bridges. That needs to be a priority before we start building new massive road projects."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: amishdude; bildeburgertollway; canada; cintra; cuespookymusic; deiboldexpressway; envirowhackos; halliburtonhighway; jorgekilledmydog; kneejerkersrule; kookalert; kookmagnetthread; mexico; nafta; naftacorridor; naftahighway; nasco; nascocorridor; no; paulmartin; presidentbush; quix; sierraclub; supercorridor; superhighway; texas; tinfoilmagnetthread; tinfoilwaytootight; transportation; transtexascorridor; transtinfoilcorridor; ttc; ttc35; tx; txdot; usa; vicentefox; wearedoomeddoomed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-203 next last
Superhighways for supertrucks!

101 posted on 06/16/2006 12:18:51 PM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
"I use 35 up here in MN everyday.

I'd appreciate a few more lanes.

Lets roll!!!!!!!!"


Unfortunately, for you, you won't be able to use them. This highway will be only used my Mexican trucks carrying containers from, oh say China, and obeying Mexican laws.

No, (or few) Americans need apply.
102 posted on 06/16/2006 12:22:25 PM PDT by NathanR (Après moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
This highway will be only used my Mexican trucks.....

That is the only thing that might kill this (if it is true).

103 posted on 06/16/2006 12:24:29 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Oh, I'm aware that she has delusions of grandeur. She must lobby satan in her sleep to be higher up the food chain.

And, the puppet masters would be a little bit dumber than they are to actually put her in power. But, they are dumb in some serious areas. They are dumb enough to think of themselves as the smartest creatures around.

She could still end up in power. Stranger things have happened. We need to pray and work against it.


104 posted on 06/16/2006 12:28:55 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
If you look at the map, freight can be offloaded in Texas.

The ports are in Mexico for several reasons: 1)Texas does not border the Pacific. 2) It is a lot more easy to build in Mexico than Texas. 3) It bypasses the unions. 4) It provides jobs for Mexicans. 5)It probably takes less time to ship from China to Mexico by ship, offload to trucks or trains, and ship to Texas, than go through the Panama Canal and offload in Texas.
105 posted on 06/16/2006 12:29:31 PM PDT by NathanR (Après moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: billbears

I am quite sure God Almighty will protect the lands given to the Israelites per His promise. Without anyone's help. It may not always seem like a 'win' at the moment, but God's ways are not our ways. Wouldn't you agree
- - - -

True. But God seems to have a hobby, passion, habit for cliffhangers and for making things exceedingly beyond impossible before He steps in and shows His grandeur and power.

So, many twists and turns can occur before the blood is as high as a horse's bridal.

And woe to anyone foolish enough to be complicit against God's Blood children of His promise to His buddies Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.


106 posted on 06/16/2006 12:31:40 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Supposedly there are maglev tube trains already running for the elite deep underground . . . at least between many US centers of power but some claim even globally.

hahahah...please...please, you need to work in the government, even just for a few months. I guarantee you you'll toss aside your conspiracy theories once you see them in action. The government is not capable of faking moon landings, and certainly not establishing super-secret underground maglev trains haha.
107 posted on 06/16/2006 12:34:23 PM PDT by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Quix

"Power"? You think that those petty little bureaucratic offices are power? You're funny.


108 posted on 06/16/2006 12:35:00 PM PDT by AmishDude (I am the King Nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Leif Ericson Park?


109 posted on 06/16/2006 12:35:38 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Remember how NAFTA was supposed to provide jobs for Mexican truckers driving in the US? Remember the stink over this? This is making an end-run so Mexicans won't share the road with us citizens.
110 posted on 06/16/2006 12:35:45 PM PDT by NathanR (Après moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Thats what I35 Denton - Ft Worth is right now...


111 posted on 06/16/2006 12:39:06 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: NathanR

Will they be the only ones paying for it?
:)

if so then they better keep the ditches cut and properly weeded too...that shouldnt be a problem


112 posted on 06/16/2006 12:42:35 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The TTC is a big topic here in Texas. I hear the arguments from the WallMartians that WalMart is good for the economy because they sell cheap goods. So, I would assume that the WalMartians would equally support this road because it will further help WMT sell cheap goods.


113 posted on 06/16/2006 12:45:27 PM PDT by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

To: Quix

I have kept myself informed. This debate is very much a replay of all the NAFTA discussions.


115 posted on 06/16/2006 1:01:08 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (I am Blogging for the GOP and Victory O6 at www.theponderingamerican.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
If you look at the map, freight can be offloaded in Texas.

It'a all just more duplicatation of government boondoggles. Have one "smart port" at the first entry into the USA and the you don't need the rest of them, do you?

116 posted on 06/16/2006 1:01:35 PM PDT by balrog666 (There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
In case you didn't comprehend it the first time, I'll say it again: The pacific ports can't handle the future traffic.

As for the Texas republican party, they can pay for their ride and I can pay for mine. If they don't want to pay the toll, they can stay off the road.

117 posted on 06/16/2006 1:12:05 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

"Leif Ericson Park?"

Yah, sure, you betcha!


118 posted on 06/16/2006 1:13:26 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

"And if the Texans heard you make your silly argument, I suspect you would be making your points swinging from the tight end of a good sturdy Texas rope."

Poppycock! They'd just talk about it endlessly.


119 posted on 06/16/2006 1:14:58 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Don't know. I do know that it will be MEXICAN customs, that will be looking at them in Kansas City.


120 posted on 06/16/2006 1:15:45 PM PDT by NathanR (Après moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson