Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seattle Group Keeps Up Fight to Save City's Two Newspapers (Dinosaur Media Extinction Alert)
Editor & Publisher ^ | June 15, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 06/15/2006 1:33:53 PM PDT by abb

NEW YORK Seattle's Committee for a Two Newspaper Town, which was formed to preserve the city's two newspapers in the face of an effort by The Seattle Times to dissolve their joint operating agreement, plans to keep up its court fight, despite the loss of some financial support and union backing.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported Thursday that the committee's board met Wednesday night and "emerged with a plan to broaden its support base, expand its board and hold fundraising events, the committee chairwoman, Anne Bremner, said. 'We are full speed ahead,' said Bremner, a lawyer. 'This is such a huge issue for Seattle.'"

The committee was created several years ago to intercede in a contract fight between The Seattle Times Co. and The Hearst Corp., which owns the P-I. The result of that battle, which recently moved from the courts to confidential binding arbitration, could result in the closure of one of the city's two papers.

The Times is seeking to dissolve the JOA it shares with the P-I, claiming it has the right under a provision in the agreement that allows either paper to withdraw following three consecutive years of losses. The P-I has sued to block the action, but recently agreed to allow an arbitrator to settle the matter.

The committee, which has opposed the arbitration, suffered a setback last month when the Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild, which helped create it in 2003, voted to cut all ties to the group. The union, which represents both Times and P-I employees, provided about 80 percent of the committee's funding, the P-I reported.

The arbitrator in the case, former Judge Larry Jordan, must make a decision in the matter by May 31, 2007.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dbm; newspapers; pi; post; seattle
More good news...
1 posted on 06/15/2006 1:33:55 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knews_hound; Grampa Dave; martin_fierro; Liz; norwaypinesavage; Mo1; onyx; SmithL; petercooper; ...

Ping


2 posted on 06/15/2006 1:34:40 PM PDT by abb (If it Ain't Posted on FreeRepublic, it Ain't News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

3 posted on 06/15/2006 1:35:28 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (PENCE BASHERS WILL BE CALLED OUT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

With all of the free loading commies/socialists in Seattle, it is a wonder they sell any newspapers.


4 posted on 06/15/2006 2:05:10 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

Both papers are no even good butt wipe anymore and never was.


5 posted on 06/15/2006 2:09:02 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Seattle-PI is nothing more than socialist propaganda. Good riddens.


6 posted on 06/15/2006 2:19:38 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
I've even managed to train myself not to even look at the headlines when I see the Slimes or the PeeYew in their sales boxes.
7 posted on 06/15/2006 3:29:24 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Wearing My 'Jammies Proudly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

MUHAHAHAHAHA! If you can't sell papers in lib/latte/Birkenstock land, you are in MAJOR trouble!


8 posted on 06/15/2006 4:01:04 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Free Iran! WARNING! Forbidden Cartoon: *-O)) :-{>. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
The issue is that the Times began publishing the P-I for Hearst years ago, under the JOA. The Times is now telling Hearst that they no longer want to publish the P-I for them. If the dissolution is successful, Hearst gets to decide whether to shut the paper or invest in physical plant, etc. to maintain their paper.

Imagine if Coke agreed to bottle Pepsi, and then changed their mind after Pepsi no longer had bottling capacity. That is what is going on here.

9 posted on 06/16/2006 8:50:33 AM PDT by ordinaryguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb
The Times is seeking to dissolve the JOA it shares with the P-I, claiming it has the right under a provision in the agreement that allows either paper to withdraw following three consecutive years of losses. The P-I has sued to block the action, but recently agreed to allow an arbitrator to settle the matter.

Even newspapers must obey the laws of economics. Atlas shrugged, indeed!

10 posted on 06/16/2006 1:54:30 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Looks like all DU got for Fitzmas was a beat-up scooter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson