Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.F. assistant district attorney sentenced to prison
Mercury News ^ | 6/14/06 | Bay Cities News Service

Posted on 06/14/2006 10:08:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

SAN FRANCISCO - U.S. Attorney Kevin Ryan announced that San Francisco Assistant District Attorney Robert William Roland, 35, was sentenced today to six months in prison, three years of supervised release, and 150 hours of community service for receiving drugs on three separate occasions from defendants he was prosecuting.

Roland pleaded guilty on Feb. 8 to four felony counts, including possession of MDMA, or Ecstasy, with intent to distribute, using a telephone to facilitate the commission of a felony drug offense, and two counts of possessing Ecstasy, according to the U.S. attorney's office.

`Prosecutors, because of the unique role they play in the criminal justice system, must conduct themselves with the utmost integrity. This defendant abused the public trust by violating some of the very laws he swore to uphold, with the very defendants that he was obligated to prosecute,` Ryan said.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: assistant; california; districtattorney; donutwatch; libertarians; prison; sanfrancisco; sentenced; warondrugs; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2006 10:08:19 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Six months for four felonies? Yeesh!


2 posted on 06/14/2006 10:11:01 PM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Looks like a nickel to me.


3 posted on 06/14/2006 10:17:42 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
And he doesn't have to "turn himself in" for another 6 weeks. You or I, not being agents of the state (well I'm not and I assume you're not) would go directly to jail without collecting our $200.00

To be honest though, we probably wouldn't do more than the 6 months, we just wouldn't get the grace of picking when we do it.

Oh I don't think it's a certainty he'll get disbarred either (may be wrong about that).
4 posted on 06/14/2006 10:38:00 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (Oregon - a pro-militia and firearms state that looks just like Afghanistan .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dave in Eugene of all places
Oh I don't think it's a certainty he'll get disbarred either (may be wrong about that).

He's currently "Not eligible to practice law," and is looking at a hefty suspension from practice. Disbarment's unlikely.

5 posted on 06/14/2006 11:14:41 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

from defendants he was prosecuting


The guy is nuts! Talk about pleading for help!


6 posted on 06/14/2006 11:28:36 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Is this that "Culture of Corruption" the liberals are always squawking about?


7 posted on 06/14/2006 11:49:47 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
8 posted on 06/14/2006 11:54:55 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

ping


9 posted on 06/14/2006 11:56:38 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I thought that was legal in S.F.


10 posted on 06/15/2006 3:29:22 AM PDT by CAWats (And I will make no distinction between terrorists and the democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

there is way more to this story...he had info on a lot of people there...course we will never know cause the libs don't have any 'culture of corruption".


11 posted on 06/15/2006 4:31:22 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Moderate Mooslims.....what's that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
from defendants he was prosecuting

The guy is nuts! Talk about pleading for help!

It seems like that fine old concept of barter./sarcasm

12 posted on 06/15/2006 5:09:56 AM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: winston2

He was prosecuting, not defending. But then, again, maybe not so diligently.


13 posted on 06/15/2006 8:12:31 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Almost all of the major police corruption scandals of the last several decades have had their roots in drug enforcement. We’ve seen robbery, extortion, drug dealing,
drug stealing, drug use, false arrests, perjury, throw-down guns, and murder.
And these are the good guys?"...Norm Stamper, 28-year police veteran of the San Diego police department and former Seattle police chief.


14 posted on 06/15/2006 8:33:14 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; Dave in Eugene of all places
Why is it highly unlikely he'll be disbarred? In may state any felony will get you disbarred, even something like a felony hot check case where you write 201.00 worth of hit checks. Unethical conduct in the practice of law is often going to get someone disbarred too, and no doubt drug deals with someone you are prosecuting is highly unethical. I don't know anything about this case or how they do things in California though. What is it that leads you two to believe that disbarment is unlikely in this case?
15 posted on 06/15/2006 9:17:12 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

"201.00 worth of hit checks"

Should have said, "$201.00 worth of hot checks."


16 posted on 06/15/2006 9:18:06 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

"In may state..." Should have been, "In my state." Man, that was a sloppy post. I need to proofread.


17 posted on 06/15/2006 9:21:08 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

bump


18 posted on 06/15/2006 9:22:34 AM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

19 posted on 06/15/2006 9:44:02 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Disipline = Discipline


20 posted on 06/15/2006 9:45:19 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson