Posted on 06/14/2006 4:52:10 PM PDT by garbageseeker
I am posting this article because very few people know that the Catholic Church is going out of their way to make sure CIRA is the law of the land. The church has supported illegal immigration for many years and they have been active in getting CIRA passed. I also publishing this article in the hopes that the many Catholics who support the House of Representatives would know what their church is doing on the illegal immigration issue in the United States. I really do not think that Roman Catholics know the churches position on this matter.I know that there are many Catholics out there who support the "borders enforcement only" approach, not the approach the pro-illegal immigrant. approach our leaders has taken.
And I'm sure the church would like to start paying taxes too. I'm sick of people trying to get to Heaven by stepping on me. Let them go south of the border and change laws so these people can stay in their home countries.
"A Catholic belonging to the Masons is not a "side" issue. Catholics are forbidden from joining Lodges."
If you're his pastor, then its between you and him, but FR is not the place for declarations on such personal matters, and it's a side issue vis a vis the topic. An atheist could show up here and jon the debate ... actually a few have. you made your point, let it rest.
What do you think it means in your own words, and what does it mean, when it comes to the matter of the free transfer of labor inputs? Those who have really grasped a matter, don't need to do cut and paste, and prefer not to. I least that is my preference. I rarely do cut and paste in the reply mode. I prefer to post my own thoughts, perhaps with a link.
It was an infallible declaration. How could it have been in error? In order to say that, you would have to deny the first Vatican council's declaration concerning infallibility, and deny it point blank. Clearly this door is slammed shut.
It is formally defined as "baptism of Blood," and is the method by which the Holy Innocents, who were not baptised, were saved.
It was never formally defined anywhere at all.
You really do need to learn some basic ecclesiology. And you need to learn what "in the Church" means so that you will understand Eugene's statement.
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Liberation theology explores the relationship between Christian theology (usually Roman Catholic) and political activism, particularly in areas of social justice, poverty, and human rights. The main methodological innovation of liberation theology is to do theology from the viewpoint of the economically poor and oppressed of the human community.
Sounds like the policy paper of the UCSSB on illegal immigration and the stance Cardinal Roger Mahoney and his position on illegal immigration.(Religious Marxism)
Bump
Allow me to put you in a corner. Guess further... wrong about exactly what?
A Feeneyite.
Persist in your error. You are contradicting the Church.
Your fighting a losing battle.
I don't quite follow how concern for the poor translates into immigration policy myself. Concern for the poor raises a host of complex issues when it comes to public policy, and at some point, such complexity goes way beyond theology as to ways and means. It requires other expertise that most theologians don't possess.
And what is a Catholic who denies papal infallibility as you have above, and who believes in salvation outside the Church against the clear position of the Catholic Church, as you have?
LOL, no am I am not. This has nothing to do with Marxism. Its quite clear looking at the numerous documents from the Vatican that Marxism is not a issue here.
I don't mind being consigned to hell, Sink, if there is a hell. If that is my fate, something is wrong with the cosmos, and it really isn't my fault, that the cosmos is a faulty tower.
Your dying on the vine. The USCCB policy paper on illegal immigration is exposed as part of the Marxist beliefs of "Liberation Theology".
Arguing with a Feeneyite is a waste of time. You are going to be surprised who is in heaven, my friend. Baptism of desire, baptism of blood. Look 'em up.
And you, our dear Masonic member, are in material sin.
A person who has resorted to name calling has lost the battle.
Be gone.
Also nothing here in the immigration debate has seem to advocate a classless society. That was the struggle for many that advocated it.
This debate is about:
The issue of Worldwide migration
The issue of the migrant
The issue of the poor and the abilty to work
The ability of a State to control its borders and regualate its on well being
The issue of the family and human dignity.
I have seen nothing that approaches anything to Marxism in any mainstream at least discussion of this issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.