Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Photo Essay: Show down in CALEDONIA, Ont. (+ links)
Various Canadan newspapers via Google | April-May 2006

Posted on 06/12/2006 1:04:48 PM PDT by yankeedame

Land Claim Chronology

Map of Disputed Area


Native protesters occupied a construction site near the southern Ontario town of Caledonia over a land-claims dispute.


They halted construction on a new suburb with 10 partially built homes.


Protesters had been camped out at the site since February 28, erecting tents, a teepee and a wooden building. Early in the morning on April 20, police in cruisers and vans arrived at the site with tear gas cannons and Tasers, arresting 16 people.


More protesters arrived soon afterward and barricaded the road leading to the site.


Plumes of black smoke billowed in the air as protesters burned a pile of tires on the two-lane highway.


Protesters say the land was granted to Six Nations more than 200 years earlier and never officially transferred to non-natives.


A protester returns to the barricades from a coffee run. (Frank Gunn/Canadian Press)


Native spokesperson Clyde Powless, brown jacket, gets into a shoving match with Caledonia residents following the removal of the Native barricade near Caledonia, Ont., on May 22, 2006.


Native protesters tear up a Canadian flag as tempers flare May 22.


Native protesters beckon to residents to come over and fight after the barricades were re-erected May 22.


A native protester and a local resident exchange blows during confrontations May 22.


A large gathering of concerned residents gathered at the Caledonia fairgrounds to hear about the current situation on April 25. It was mainly a peaceful event until a few vocal citizens made their anger known at the end of the event.


OPP handcuff a native woman after a rally on April 24.


OPP officers arrest a protester after a rally April 24. About 500 angry people rushed a police barricade surrounding the native protest, hurling insults and demanding an end to the standoff.


Caledonia residents voice their displeasure with the ongoing Native protest.


A native protester guards the main blockade during occupation of a sub-division construction site and part of Argyle Rd., the main road through Caledonia.


Native youth stand near the north-west corner of the disputed development land with sticks, and bats in their hands. On the street in the distance, other youth have gathered to watch. On the street are some white vans with OPP in them.


Native Canadians barricade Hwy. 6 South, south of Argyl Street as a fire burns burns on the highway in the distance April 20. This is as far as protesters were allowing media to advance. The OPP raided a construction site to the south earlier in the morning, and made some arrests, but protestors later reclaimed the area.


Natives are using this dump truck to block the road.


Native Canadians have posted a sign on a barricade near disputed land in Caledonia.


Riot plice and protestors clash as residents protest early Saturday June 10, 2006 in Caledonia, Ont.

==========

Latest:

CALEDONIA, Ont. — Police were seeking arrest warrants today for seven aboriginal protesters they say were involved in a string of violent clashes at the scene of a long-standing native blockade in southern Ontario.

The seven face a battery of serious charges, including attempted murder, assault and forcible confinement, after angry protesters surrounded a U.S. Border Patrol vehicle on Friday and dragged out its three occupants.

"They were forcibly removed after they were swarmed," Graham said.

The injured police officer was pulled out of the path of the stolen vehicle as it was driven deliberately at him, OPP Const. Doug Graham said today.

Graham said the officer was treated and released. The stolen vehicle was recovered but no arrests were made.

Officers from the U.S. Border Patrol were in the area to observe how provincial police were handling the standoff, he added.

"Often, police officials work together and share information, and that group was here observing how we were using our police resources during this incident," Graham said.

Other charges police expect to lay against the protesters include theft of a motor vehicle, robbery, intimidation and assault causing bodily harm, he added.

The incident was just one of several altercations with protesters on Friday that are related to the charges.

Several hundred angry residents of Caledonia confronted police in full riot gear to protest police inaction after two CH-TV news cameramen were injured in a scuffle with angry protesters. One of the victims, who needed stitches to close a head wound, said police officers were nearby, but took no action during the attack....

Story continued here


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: opp

1 posted on 06/12/2006 1:04:51 PM PDT by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

When do the Canadian courts take up the issue?


2 posted on 06/12/2006 1:09:57 PM PDT by Owl558 (Pardon my spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

This is crazy. THe police are doing everything they can to protect the Indians but they won't do a thing to protect the residents and passersby in the area. The police invovled need to be fired and the military needs to come in and clear out the criminals.


3 posted on 06/12/2006 1:26:33 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
This is a tough one in that there are 'criminals' on both sides of the issue causing the violence and both sides have pretty good legal stance to the land. The Natives owned the land under federal grant going back well over 200 years, however, those who are trying to develop on the land also have evidence to grant ownership..

The previous poster is right, the courts really need to take this up instead of letting everyone fight it out physically. This should have been taken up long before anyone was allowed to develop on the land.

IMHO, the natives probably have the strongest legal stance as their grant precedes the newer grant, unless the new grantees can show where the tribes signed their land out.
4 posted on 06/12/2006 1:44:27 PM PDT by mnehring (Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Liberals (Democrats) are not Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

This is what happens when you allow yourself to be disarmed.


5 posted on 06/12/2006 2:10:14 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
One thing that puzzles me -- and maybe you can answer this for me.(These are not trick, or "leading", questions. They are questions to which I can't find answers.)

- What, exactly, does the tribe plan on doing with the land in question? Yes, I know. They don't have to do anything with it. Still and all, considering the big brouhaha over this I could only suppose they had their own alternative for use of this land ( build a museum, open a casino, etc.); or is it more a case of just wanting it for the sake of having it?

-- Why did the project get to the point of 10 houses in various stages of completion before the protests began? Why not when the original permits were issued? If not before ground was broken then why not swiftly afterward, say with the arrival of steam shovels and dump trucks?

-- If the land is declared Indian Territory what about those structures? Do the Indians now own them -- to keep or tear down as they choose? What about the builder(s)? If there is compensation then from who -- the state? the tribe?

6 posted on 06/12/2006 2:19:33 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Get real!! The very first sentence is "Police were seeking arrest warrants of seven aboriginal protesters." Do you see anywhere where they are arresting the residents?
7 posted on 06/12/2006 2:31:01 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

I don't know the answer to all three, however, as for the first, I agree, it doesn't matter what they plan to do if they do have legal ownership of the land.


8 posted on 06/12/2006 2:43:38 PM PDT by mnehring (Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Liberals (Democrats) are not Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson