Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Joins Kennedy's Wind Farm Fight
NewsMax ^ | June 12, 2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 06/12/2006 9:44:14 AM PDT by ncountylee

Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., has a new ally in his effort to torpedo an environmentally friendly "wind farm” off the coast from the Kennedy compound in Hyannis – the Pentagon.

The Defense Department has begun a study to find out if wind turbine projects designed to produce energy could interfere with military radar – even though wind farms are already operating in military radar areas.

The study is threatening not only the Cape Wind project off the coast of Massachusetts, but other wind farm projects around the country as well.

The study was inserted in the 2006 Defense Authorization Act by senators who want to block Cape Wind, according to wind farm developers cited by the Washington Post.

"This legislation was intended to derail Cape Wind, but it has a boomerang effect and affected a lot of projects around the country,” Michael Skelly of Horizon Wind Energy, which is building the nation’s largest wind farm near Bloomington, Ill., told the Post.

Wind turbine facilities in the works in Wisconsin, North Dakota, South Dakota and Illinois have received word from the federal government that the projects must be put on hold while the study is ongoing.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: banana; capewind; chappaquiddick; drunk; energy; fatboy; govwatch; hyannis; hypocrisy; kennedy; kennedycompound; liberalhypocrisy; miltech; nimby; selfish; swimmer; wind; windenergy; windfarm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2006 9:44:19 AM PDT by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Good Lord. Wind farms screw up military radar? I don't believe it.


2 posted on 06/12/2006 9:46:18 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Kennedy and his ilk's political clout and influence reaches far...probably Clinton appointees and hires within the Pentagon and Defense Department.


3 posted on 06/12/2006 9:46:58 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

To quote Dean Vernon Wormer:

"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life son."

Unless of course you are a Kennedy.


4 posted on 06/12/2006 9:47:14 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Well, but what's the worst that could go wrong? The Russians bomb Boston?


5 posted on 06/12/2006 9:47:40 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
I'm beginning to agree with the senior Senator from Chappaquiddick.No wind farm should be built in Nantucket Sound.

However,there's no reason why we can't build a nuke plant somewhere around there.

6 posted on 06/12/2006 9:47:40 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
The study is threatening not only the Cape Wind project off the coast of Massachusetts, but other wind farm projects around the country as well.

That is assuming the result before the study is completed. It may prove there is no concern and lose one more baseless argument against wind energy.

7 posted on 06/12/2006 9:47:51 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Several wind farms are within this range of military radar with no problems.

This is a red herring.


8 posted on 06/12/2006 9:48:31 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

And it kills little birdies....


9 posted on 06/12/2006 9:51:03 AM PDT by samadams2000 (Somebody important make The Call.....pitchforks and lanterns.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Radar won WW2 -- but is now useless as a third teat on a cat.

Time to close down all military radar since he enemy can shut it off with WINDMILLS.

10 posted on 06/12/2006 9:55:23 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

causes prostate cancer,too.


11 posted on 06/12/2006 9:55:50 AM PDT by Rakkasan1 (Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Man!! You just got to wonder about all this crap, it seems like we're shoveling $#it against the tide. They scream for wind farms, than when you put it in their backyard the NIMBY's (kennedys-Kerrys)scream bloody murder and get the Pentagon on their side. Has the Pentagon ever opposed a wind farm before??


12 posted on 06/12/2006 10:02:28 AM PDT by KenmcG414 (wHAT'ST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Find out WHO in the Defense Dept is siding and aiding Ted Kennedy and you will find a TRAITOR....not because of the wind thingy but anyone in the DEFENSE dept that sides with Kennedy is NOT a friend of the military OR the USA!


13 posted on 06/12/2006 10:06:46 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Don't ever agree with Kennedy! He will turn on a dime, and in the case of the Wind Farms, he did that, back in May.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2006/05/26/kennedy_drops_demand_for_gubernatorial_veto_over_wind_farm_plan/

When I read that I wondered what we weren't being told, what hidden motive did Kennedy have for "softening" his position on the wind farms. I wager we still don't know the rest of the story, but I bet he knew back in May that the Pentagon was entering the fray.


14 posted on 06/12/2006 10:10:57 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
Good Lord. Wind farms screw up military radar? I don't believe it.

Yeah, sort of like one of those "it's for the children" arguments.

15 posted on 06/12/2006 10:11:26 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

I can't see how. Most of these are too low to the ground and have blades made of composite plastic materials rather than metal. Therefore they would reflect little if any radar energy.

Besides, I believe that radars can run baseline readings to filter out any results caused by wind farms.

Sounds like Kennedy whispered in someones ear to get that inserted into the report.


16 posted on 06/12/2006 10:25:13 AM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life son."

Unless of course you are a Kennedy.

Ok. You asked for the Democrat poster-child.


17 posted on 06/12/2006 10:26:32 AM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
...he enemy can shut it off with WINDMILLS.

And what about the those obsolete propeller driven aircraft? WERE DOOMED! US is vulnerable to attack by antique airplanes!

18 posted on 06/12/2006 10:27:28 AM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

They are permanently attached. We'll never be rid of them.


19 posted on 06/12/2006 10:32:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee; GreenFreeper; RexBeach; Jeff Head; Mikey_1962; Wolfie; ex-snook; Theo; jpsb; Old_Mil; ..
The Kennedy organization's 'corrupt coalition' constituency is probably invested in current overly-centralized, polluting energy sources, and is highly threatened by clean, natural energy production that's easily decentralized like wind, mini-hydro, solar -- to the point where the natural energy sources can be home-based.

And where would the current corrupt, polluting energy industry companies/trade associations be then?

20 posted on 06/12/2006 10:36:15 AM PDT by ProCivitas (Qui bono? Quo warranto? ; Who benefits? By what right/authority ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson