Posted on 06/12/2006 8:01:24 AM PDT by zaxxon
The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program was conceived in 1929 by the International Association of Chiefs of Police to meet a need for reliable, uniform crime statistics for the nation. In 1930, the FBI was tasked with collecting, publishing, and archiving those statistics. Today, several annual statistical publications, such as the comprehensive Crime in the United States, are produced from data provided by nearly 17,000 law enforcement agencies across the United States.
Other annual publications, such as Hate Crime Statistics and Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted address specialized facets of crime such as hate crime or the murder and assaults of law enforcement officers respectively.
(Excerpt) Read more at fbi.gov ...
The latest Hate Crime Statistics available on the site are from 2004 and, as I've stated in a previous thread, hispanics/latinos do not have a column on the "known offenders" table. However, there is a column on another table for "anti hispanic" crimes. Apparently, hispanics can be victims of hate-crimes, but not perpetrators. Hate-crimes committed by hispanics/latinos seem to be combined with "white" perpetrators, or perhaps they are part of the over 3000 offenses committed by "unknown offenders." Check it out here:
ping for later
Why do I get the impression that if "hispanic" were a separate group that the numbers in the "White" category would drop precipitously? But than that's the gummit. When it comes to affirmative action and handouts, the gummit doesn't mind having a "hispanics" category.
So blacks comprise 1/6 the population, but commit 1/3 as many hate crimes as whites?
But if "hispanics" are indeed "whites" (by the FBI's definition), those fractions would shift significantly.
Not only on those that commit, but also on victims?
They are kept that way too...but don't hold your breath on them being released as there would be a lot of anger from whites towards minorities if these facts were known. The various police departments won't write things up as a race crime if it is blacks on whites, but will if it is whites on blacks. Go figure!
In Table 3
Known Offender's Race by Offense Type, 2004
The categories given are:
White, Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, Multiple races group, Unknown race, unknown offender.
The obvious question is this: "Why aren't hispanics listed as a choice?"
Onward to Table 5:
Known Offenders by Race Bias Motivation.
And once again, here are the categories:
White, Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, Multiple races group, Unknown race, unknown offender.
And so the same question is, "Why aren't hispanics listed as a choice?"
And in Table 10:
Known Offenders Race (A total)
The categories repeat tables 3 and 5.
In table 5, hispanics can clearly be listed under Ethnicity/National Origin. However, they are not included in the "Known Offenders" category. WHY?
The Government has no trouble, in let's say, something like the census, in identifying hispanics. There doesn't seem to be a problem with listing hispanics separately in job applications or admissions applications to colleges. Yet, in these tables, there is a blindness to identifying hispanics as a "Known Offender" category. I'll call this what it is - FRAUD; just more of the ongoing waste, fraud, and abuse by dishonest, disgusting PC Government employees. But since it's the Government, it's ok.
Uniform Crime Report values end at the Rio Grande.
Excellent point!
As opposed to being spoon-fed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.