Posted on 06/12/2006 6:17:05 AM PDT by rhema
You know that guy on the freeway? The one who cut you off in traffic the other day, and flashed a vulgar salute as he zoomed by? We used to think of this as "road rage" - reckless rudeness, plain and simple. Silly us.
Now, thanks to a new study, we understand that the poor man may simply be the victim of a medical condition: intermittent explosive disorder (IED).
The study, paid for in part by the National Institute of Mental Health, gives us the lowdown on this "seldom-studied mental illness." IED, it informs us, is characterized by "recurrent episodes of angry and potentially violent outbursts," and is much more common than previously thought. As many as 16 million Americans - 7.3 percent of adults - may suffer from it.
"In the general population, aggressiveness or 'blowing up' is considered bad behavior," says coauthor Dr. Emil Coccaro. "People think, 'This person just needs an attitude adjustment.' "
Such primitive ideas are wrong, the good doctor assures us. IED involves the inadequate production or function of serotonin, a mood-regulating and behavior-inhibiting brain chemical. Doctors advise a threefold approach to treatment: early diagnosis, psychiatric drugs and behavior therapy.
What a revelation! Now instead of getting mad at the guy who tailgates me while shaking his fist, I owe him my sympathy.
The "road rage" study is the latest example of America's rush to "medicalize" behavior previously thought of as simply boorish, discourteous or wrong. Real mental illnesses exist, of course. But the push to transform our nation into a giant mental hospital is getting ridiculous.
In 2005, for example, the National Comorbidity Survey found that 26 percent of American adults qualified as having a mental illness during the previous 12 months. The current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--
(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...
Well, that's what happens when the lunatics take over the asylum...
I remember seeing a cartoon in Playboy back in the 60's when I was a teen (yes, I just looked at Playboy for the cartoons and articles, which unfortunately explains a lot about me today). There was a man lying on a couch, with a psychiatrist sitting on a chair beside the couch, and the shrink was saying "You know, my secretary has an interesting theory about your case. She thinks you're just an @$$hole."
I think this diagnosis explains a lot of road rage, as well as other antisocial behavior.
Is this a joke?
As someone who gets easily p!ssed off when treated rudely, I can honestly say that Jesus got it right (as He always does) when He instructed us to turn the other cheek and forgive those who sin against us.
There may be many people who are constantly "on the edge" and are raging drivers.
However, IMHO, the root cause of "road rage" is usually some driver who is unwilling or unable to follow the simple rules of the road, such as staying right except when passing, yielding when not having the right of way, etc.
Most of us deal with this stream of incompetents on a daily basis without getting too upset about it, but I can understand how regular exposure to willful stupidity would take its toll after awhile.
Certainly, the "ragers" should better control their emotions, but in the "road rage" discussion, one never hears any consideration that the "ragees" may be partially to blame.
"National Comorbidity Survey found that 26 percent of American adults qualified as having a mental illness during the previous 12 months."
YasSah, YasSah, YasSah, Dr. Doctor HeadShrinker, Sah!
We mere peasents real eager to give all you deservin' Shrinks ALL our money - 'cause you gonna help cure us o' what ails us.
Anyone who gave this RedStar article any credence at all should remind themselves of the Rule Of Thirds. It says that 1/3 of the Shrink's patients get better, 1/3 stay the same, 1/3 get worse.
That is true for patients of Rogerians and Skinnerians. Fraudian's (spelling deliberate) patients do not follow the rule of thirds - 1/3 get better, 2/3 get worse.
Applying the "follow the cashflow" rule explains the diagnosis quite clearly.
Brace yourselves for a new declaration by the HillaBeast that America must have more Shrinks. In one sense, she will be correct, for did not nearly half of the voters vote for Democrats? That is a reliable indicator of mental illness.
the "ragees" may be partially to blame.
Now..now..now! What's wrong with someone moving into the passing lane and staying there beside a car in the right lane without any attempt to actually pass and this goes on for miles? They can't be held responsible for contributing to the ire of an unhappy driver, can they? (sarc)
Oh...and if the SOB keeps it up. Plug him with a .357 hollow-point. But only after forgiving him.
"Maybe you should get out of the passing lane while going 10mph under the speed limit, putting on lipstick and chatting on your cell phone.
"
Or, maybe, that isn't what happened at all. I was driving on a local interstate that passes through my city the other day. I was in the left lane, going 55, the limit on that stretch of I-94.
Guy behind me motors up doing about 65, flashed his lights at me, starts blowing his horn, and is flipping me off as I look in the mirror.
My fault? No, not really. 1/4 mile ahead is the left exit I'll be taking. Left exit. It's marked well, by signs, and even arrows marking the lane to use to switch to that other Interstate. But no...that doesn't work for Mr. Butthead behind me.
The left lane is not always the passing lane. Sometimes it's a transition lane, especially in cities. Sometimes, there is even a left exit.
Oh, yeah....the lane one over to the right, which is one of the two through lanes on that freeway at that point, had no traffic in it. Mr. Butthead should have shifted to the right one lane, passed me, and gone on his way.
I had no choice. I had to be in the leftmost lane to take my exit.
It's not always as simple as you pretend it is.
This issue deals in part with what many refer to as a "hot button" issue. There are things that "bug" me that don't bug other people and vice versa. I agree that, if people while driving paid more attention to their driving and less to their cell phones and makeup, traffic would not only flow more smoothly, but there would be fewer mishaps. Of course I realize that the only way I'm going to win this one is to change my reaction to it because, rest assured, these other distracted drivers are not going to change their habits to accomodate those of us who are wanting to move along with minimal impediments.
Nah, it's caused by STRESS. The stress many of us go through every day.
Trying to do the work of two people, while your boss is complaining that you don't do enough. Juggling work and family. Trying to work and save money, while the price of everything keeps going up. Oh yeah, and taxes seem to take half your paycheck.
You feel like your on a treadmill that's just been greased.
Been there.
It's so true. We need to somehow be kinder to ourselves. I realized lately that I've been a very bad driver, and have let those exact same stresses make me think that just by going faster and getting ahead of people on the road, that somehow I'll compensate for all the perceived failures.
I realized that I was only further jeopardizing my happiness with the likelihood of an accident. We saw two bad ones yesterday. They happen in a flash.
"Just my observations in my area, YYMV."
And there it is. I wonder, though: What is the prevailing speed on that Interstate you're talking about? Is it around the speed limit?
In any case, that's the situation you find yourself in. The way I figure, I can either drive along with the traffic, listen to the radio, and get where I'm going with some sanity, or I can get royally ticked off at my situation, and get where I'm going in the same time, but with my blood pressure elevated.
I think I'll stick with the more relaxed option.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.