Posted on 06/10/2006 6:20:18 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy
Conservative Republicans held such hopes when Pres. Bush was heralded into office and the Republicans gained control of the Congress. That was then, this is now.
According to recent polls, conservative republicans are perplexed by the non-conservative actions of this president and the Republican-controlled Congress.
As I probed this latest confusion I found that I, and millions of other citizens, are f-o-s-s-i-l-s. According to Wikipedia Encyclopedia online, we are "Paleo" or "Old" conservatives. We are living fossils, 'about-to-become-extinct' hangers-on of the Grand Old Party which no longer appears to represent traditional conservatism.
The Republican Party in its essentials has been taken over by a mutation. Wikipedia describes this line of thought as "Neo" or "New Wave" conservatism. It's tenets are not really new, just enjoined by present-day politicians and citizens as the direction our nation should pursue. But it is contrary to many basic "Paleocon" principles.
"Paleocons" believe in the principles of limited government, limited spending and borrowing, limited intervention into citizens' lives, and states' rights. They also believe in restraint of foreign entanglement, a strong national defense and traditional family values
"Neocons" believe in an agressive foreign policy, empiric intervention in other nations to spread democracy, and global economic-trade policies. Weak on domestic policies, they lack emphasis on national issues. Their vision includes motivating our nation towards what I believe Pres. Bush's father referred to as the "New World Order." Include growth of government and overspending too.
Sound familiar? Now we know why the media refers to Pres. Bush and his administration as "Neocons." Many congressional Republicans belong in this catagory too.
The Republican-controlled Congress has acted and evolved in accordance with the mutant Neocon concept of overspending and overgrowing government, ignoring the burgeoning National and Public Debt approaching $40-60 trillion, most of it owned by foreign investors.
Recent crises and scandals such as social security, medicare, tax reform, earmarks, budget deficits, illegal aliens and gasoline prices gain the media spotlight for a few days or weeks. Then they seem to fade away, crammed together on the "we'll deal with you later"shelf. Always later.
My wake-up call came the morning I woke up to Howard Dean saying, "The first thing we want is tough border control, we have to do a much better job on our borders than George Bush has done." Though I knew this was blatant political rhetoric, it was shocking because I completely agreed with him.
Pres. Bush and the Congress have ignored domestic security of our homeland, borders and ports until it was raised by the people! But if I agree with a liberal democrat, that does not a democrat make.
It is clear that the Grand Old Party has evolved and mutated which leaves a large conservative group, the Paleocons, scratching their heads and wondering what happened? I, for one, feel isolated from the GOP. The Party has entombed the Paleocons on the sidelines, bleached fossils, puzzled eyes peering at the GOP's total embrace of Neo-conservatism.
There is excited talk about Congress gearing up and acting on a few issues before the upcoming elections so they won't lose voters. I've got news for them. They have already lost citizens like this old fossil, who have reflected on the last five years of non-conservative actions.
Where's the limits on spending, limits on growth in government, adherence to the U.S. Constitution? Where's the traditional values and seeking the good of the nation as a whole instead of the corruptive influence of special interests? Yes, there are a few "Paleocons" in Congress but they are not listened to nor even heard amongst the clamor of "Neocons" and "Liberals" calling each other names.
I am a living fossil as are million of citizens, which brings me to the point. Where's the party that speaks to my conscience? I am past that retort: "Oh no! you must vote Republican or the Democrats will win!" Oh Please! I say so what? Has it made any difference?
The Grand Old Party appears to have accepted this "Neocon" mutation, to move towards a world economy policy, open borders and the "New World Order." Why would I, this old fossil of white-bleached bones, vote for any republican candidate? No longer does the Republican Party speak to or for my "conscience."
As for this Paleocon, I am searching for a party that matches my "conscience." This is the one freedom citizens still have in this country a citizen's privilege and responsibility to vote his or her "conscience." This old fossil takes this duty seriously.
I don't remember any such thing. Have quotes to back up your claim?
Kudos to them ... and catcalls to the Republicans in the Senate and White House who want amnesty.
No entanglement.
When did he engage in nation-building?
Parting shot then I gotta go. In my mind, the Democrat's challenge is to forge Unity from Diversity and the Republican's challenge is to forge Diversity from Unity. Whoever pulls it off best will win in November. I think the Democrats have a much tougher job trying to organize a barnyard of special interest groups with the only shared value being victimhood. Republicans have got the upper hand since we share many conservative values but we have got to start working with each other to allow some diversity without compromising our integrity and not shooting those who don't agree with us individually. That is what POLITICS is all about. Over time, we can change the party from within and win; if we part ways we won't.
Not I.
You must have me confused with someone else. The article was written by Bonnie Alba and, like most articles, some parts ring true while other parts irritate.
Guess Im paleo.
Every President meets different circumstances.
Reagan did send troops to Lebanon.
Reagan did invade Grenada. Call is what you wish but it was nation building. Being a tiny nation, it just took hours.
He also helped "nation build" Nicaragua.
And the greatest Nation building of all time so, he helped to rebuild Russia from the Soviet Union.
Different time. Different place. Different methods. But it was all to build nations into something we prefer.
There is a time to fight, and it is in the Republican primaries.
Regards, Ivan
They've been departing since 1996.
? ooooooookay.
And don't forget the eleven RepublicRATs who joined their DemocRAT buddies in voting to give Social Security benefits to the illegal invaders in spite of the fact that they forged their documentation.
Mere presence of troops is not nation-building.
Reagan did invade Grenada. Call is what you wish but it was nation building. Being a tiny nation, it just took hours.
He also helped "nation build" Nicaragua.
Nonsense, and nonsense. Fighting Communist infiltrators was not nation-building ... and few if any combat troops ever went to Nicaragua.
And the greatest Nation building of all time so, he helped to rebuild Russia from the Soviet Union.
Now that's just ridiculous. Bottling up Communism's expansion until it collapsed of its internal contradictions was in no way, shape, or form nation-building.
I should have specified I'm referring to what this author was describing...sorry. :-( I don't think she understands either philosophy. She seemed to imply that any Bush does is by definition neoconservative, and that's a ridiculous definition.
I just posted an excellent article by David Frum that does an excellent job at explain where the "paleos" came from and what motivates them. It might help you to understand them better.
The oldtimers who vote for Democrats because they're afraid of paying for their own pills are only making matters worse. With the socialist Democrats running the show again it will be euthanasia time for grandpa.
These paleoconservatives threatened to leave the Party when Reagan signed the SALT agreements. Imagine if there was a FR then?? He would have been lynched.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Unpatriotic Conservatives; A War against America
Fossils unite! I'm plenty tired of Republican Lite myself. Time for a change. Then again, I live in Ohio, land of Geo. Voinovich, Little Mikey DeWine and Bob Taft.
The 3 stooges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.