Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hooray for the Death Tax!
Townhall ^ | 6/9/2006 | Larry Kudlow

Posted on 06/09/2006 6:30:26 PM PDT by wjersey

So the estate tax cut went down in the Senate, to the cheers of class warriors everywhere. Congratulations to Democratic senators Evan Bayh, Mary Landrieu, Ron Wyden, and Mark Pryor -- all of whom voted against death-tax repeal after voting in favor of it a few years ago. At last, they’ve come to their senses!

Our rich people don’t need another tax break. No, they need higher taxes. And they should be vilified, too. That’s right: America should attack rich people. In fact, we must abolish wealth, which is a tremendous drag on our economy. It’s high time that we made the rich poor.

As for all the xenophobes who want to deport the illegal immigrants who toil in this economy, may I respectfully suggest that their generals (i.e., Lou Dobbs, Pat Buchanan, and Tom Tancredo) consider expanding their dragnet? Let’s deport rich people, too!

These rich people are bad for America. We don’t need their ingenuity, their entrepreneurship, or their capital investment. In the name of egalitarian socialism, the only thing we need from them is more tax dollars. We now tax their incomes as salary, corporate profits, dividends, capital gains, and at death. But we must do better.

Perhaps we can tax them when they contribute to charities, or the building of a new church or synagogue, or a symphony orchestra, or a small-town cultural center; or when they create another college; or when they finance private scholarships for inner-city educations.

But we can’t stop there. Let’s criminalize the entire class of successful American entrepreneurs. Let’s haul out the distributional tables from the Joint Tax Committee and the Congressional Budget Office and target all upper-end earners for special wealth taxes.

Maybe we can even impose jail sentences on rich people. No more interest income at all, just like the radical fundamentalist Muslims do it!

Here’s a thought: Let’s publish the names of all rich people in the newspapers and on the blog sites. Even better, when fat cats venture out in public, let’s swarm them like those animal-rights advocates who throw paint on women wearing mink coats.

Simply, we must strive to make America more like France and Germany -- those great income-leveling, income-redistribution states. But it’s gonna take some work. When I last checked the international tax tables, I found that the U.S. has the third highest estate-tax rate out of 50 countries. We should be ashamed. Only third? We tax estates at a 46 percent marginal rate, but Japan is the best at 70 percent, followed by South Korea at 50 percent. We are pikers. How can we dare let Japan be ahead of us on taxing rich people?

The fact that 24 countries have a zero estate-tax rate, including China, should not concern us. They don’t know what they’re doing. And we do. We don’t want to be competitive in the world economy. We’d prefer to hang out a sign reading: “Capitalists are unwelcome in the U.S.”

This whole idea of keeping more of what you earn and own is just plain stupid. In fact, this whole capitalistic notion is just one of those bizarre global trends that undoubtedly will be reversed as people come to their senses.

The Czech Republic, Estonia, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico -- they’re obviously all nuts with their zero tax rates on estates. Did I say Mexico? That’s perfect. Instead of creating thousands of new businesses and millions of new jobs in America, our rich can do this for Mexico. If we deport them, that is. What a great idea!

Forget Sen. Jon Kyl’s fallback position of a 15 percent death-tax rate, after exempting the first $5 million of an estate. That would move us too close to Canada, Australia, and Argentina, which also have zero rates. It would also promote the foolish idea that there is a link between reward and work, and reward and risk.

The whacko ultra-right-wing idea that it must pay after-tax to work and invest is simply insane. Forget what the brilliant Arthur Laffer says. The best way to generate more saving and investment is to tax both more.

This may all sound wrong, but our soak-the-rich liberals are deep thinkers. They have their fingers on the pulse of the hundred-million-strong investor class. They know that the worldwide spread of free-market economics, which was launched by Reagan and Thatcher twenty-five years ago, which has raised global prosperity to record heights, and which has caused the phenomenal growth of the middle class in places like India, China, and Russia, is absolutely nuts.

After all, capital is the enemy of labor! Forget the obvious facts that you can’t create a new job without a business and that you can’t fund a new business without capital. That’s obviously wrong.

Once again, capital is the enemy. Rich people are evil. We have to put an end to all this capitalist, supply-side nonsense.

By the way, when is Karl Marx’s birthday? I have to stop writing now, so I can go look it up. Next May? Well, at least that will give me time to prepare a triumphant celebration for the greatest soak-the-rich advocate of all time.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; congress; deathtax; kudlow; larrykudlow; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: cpdiii
I did those jobs for me not as a service to someone else.

Oh, and in the same sense, the millionaires did nothing for you: your argument collapses.

41 posted on 06/09/2006 8:52:43 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

It can't be, the Kennedys' not paying their fair share.


42 posted on 06/09/2006 8:56:25 PM PDT by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: art_rocks

Oh, they have some off shore trusts, you better believe it kiddo!


43 posted on 06/09/2006 8:57:59 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: art_rocks

Oh, they have some off shore trusts, you better believe it kiddo!


44 posted on 06/09/2006 8:58:02 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
If all fortunes were earned, wealthy people would be much more likely to be conservatives, since they would have to understand how the world really works in order to become successful.

That may well be true. But it's a policy that should be enforced by the owners of the already taxed wealth, not by the government.

45 posted on 06/09/2006 9:05:11 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
We have quite a bit of common ground. :)

The issue I have is simply the fundamental inequity of such a tax and the way it is imposed.

I don't think a legacy of insurmountable debt is a good thing either, but I'm not convinced that a tax which singles out wealthy citizens is the best way to go about reducing that debt. That minority of the wealthy already contributed the majority of the government's tax revenue throughout their lives.

Perhaps I don't feel as strongly about the debt issue as you do; I don't have any children -- at least not yet.

46 posted on 06/09/2006 9:06:21 PM PDT by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Oh, and in the same sense, the millionaires did nothing for you: your argument collapses.

The paid me. I am not indebted to those that now pick my lettuce. Those millionaires that I once worked for now pay them. Just out of curiosity have you ever worked in a swamp in South Louisiana in the summer for minimum wage 12 hours a day for 8 days and then 4 days off? Have you ever worked on a rig in the North Sea and have it go down? Have you ever been in a foreign country and know without doubt if you say the wrong thing you are dead? Do you have any idea what it is like to hobble out in the light of winter morning and see the light of day and realize it is a gift to just be alive.

47 posted on 06/09/2006 9:08:33 PM PDT by cpdiii (Socialism is popular with the ruling class. It gives legitimacy to tyranny and despotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
Perhaps I don't feel as strongly about the debt issue as you do

I accidentally pressed "Post" instead of "Preview." I meant I don't feel as strongly about using this method of paying down the debt.

48 posted on 06/09/2006 9:09:39 PM PDT by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: All
I'm not at all familiar with tax policy regarding inheritance, but is it possible to somehow 'hide' some of your assets in interest bearing offshore accounts in a way that the government can't account for them? I assume that if such a thing were possible someone could save money there and have a beneficiary that could access the account in the event of a death.
49 posted on 06/09/2006 9:13:30 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
"I don't want to see our grand kids and great grand kids cursing us for massive debt FoxInSocks, that is my "

If your kids and grandkids are going to curse you for not giving all your money to the Government, you raised a bunch of liberals.

But to keep in their liberal graces, by all means give it to the Government to invest in queer studies or some such silly thing.
50 posted on 06/09/2006 9:16:02 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Juan Williams....The DNC's "Crash test Dummy" for talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

Great post. Thanks Larry Kudlow.


51 posted on 06/09/2006 9:18:48 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

That sounds liberal BS to me you just spouted, because you would suggest you should be able to run away from your bill and should leave it instead to your heirs.

Were is your supposed self reliance, responsibility and all that?

Why do you get the impression you get a pass on a debt from your generation?

I'm a conservative sonny, and here, please take my debt with you... Doesn't wash B8U


52 posted on 06/09/2006 9:24:45 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Do you hire someone to buy you a car.....how much do you pay them to do that? 30%? The LESS money the GOVERNMENT has the BETTER.....and taxing people on their assets at DEATH is contemptible.....we pay taxes all of our lives. AND, the newly wealthy, i.e. women and minorities are going to be hardest hit, too....so think about what you are advocating. The Dynasties already have theirs (Buffet, Kennedy, Rockefeller, Gates) and will pay LITTLE to nothing....paying off the debt will then AGAIN be the JOB of the MIDDLE CLASS....whatever that is...but, we all kinda know what it is....it's US!


53 posted on 06/09/2006 9:39:23 PM PDT by goodnesswins ( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

The Dynasty families (Gates, Rockefeller, Kennedy, et al.)have all sorts of ways to "hide" their money from death taxes.....i.e. Foundations, where they they hire their family and friends to do work that furthers THEIR interests, and those are not necessarily, the interests of this nation.


54 posted on 06/09/2006 9:41:37 PM PDT by goodnesswins ( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Hmmmm.....maybe the children should have to earn their own money.

So your idea of social engineering justifies the theft of other peoples property?
55 posted on 06/09/2006 9:44:56 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Aren't you the same guy that just a few posts ago, said that anyone that didn't hide their money from taxes in trusts was stupid? Yes, I knew you were the same one.

Now you say anyone that don't drink the kool-aid and give their money to the Government is somehow a liberal, or unAmerican?

Set down the bong.
56 posted on 06/09/2006 9:46:29 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Juan Williams....The DNC's "Crash test Dummy" for talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I doubt I have enough income at this time to make it worthwhile to pay a tax attorney(snake) enough money to make it worthwhile to do such a thing, but once my wife and I finish our education the knowledge of such things will be useful. If all of those elites like Kennedy(per your example) can avoid the IRS while pushing it on the rest of us, we should be able to avoid it too!
57 posted on 06/09/2006 9:47:09 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

LOL....I was about to ask him if he's a farmer....he seems such an expert!


58 posted on 06/09/2006 9:47:20 PM PDT by goodnesswins ( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

It COSTS money to AVOID it....is the problem....and you need a treasure trove of attorneys and accountants to keep track of things.....in other words I believe it only becomes cost effective when you have millions.....more power to you WHEN YOU and your wife get there....THAT is the beauty of America.....you can STRIVE to be RICH (or we used to).....but, the penalty is getting very high if you are not quite RICH enough.


59 posted on 06/09/2006 9:49:34 PM PDT by goodnesswins ( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
"THAT is the beauty of America"

Amen! Having said that, the current tax 'system' needs to be scrapped, and replaced with something else. I'm too ignorant in tax law to make an informed suggestion on exactly what, but I like what I've heard of "The Fair Tax" so far.

60 posted on 06/09/2006 9:55:09 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson