[FierceDraka]

Yay! Oh boy! More authoritarianism justified by "public safety"!

He who trades liberty for safety deserves neither.

[LauraleeBraswell]

For discussion, women are most subjugated in societies that have the least “sex and sensuality from the media." Think of the middle East, Central Asia and Africa. In fact, I would say many of these societies are far more violent than ours.

[Mr. Jeeves]

Especially since pornography is largely an outgrowth of the repression of sexuality by political and religious institutions like the...um...Catholic Church. ;)

In a sexually healthy society, the more destructive forms of pornography would largely disappear.

[RKBA Democrat]

"He who trades liberty for safety deserves neither."

I'm missing how the "right" to view sado-masochistic sexual imagery is a basic human liberty that should be defended. And try as I might, I just don't recall any of the treatises developed by the founders of this country discussing any "right" to view sexually provocative material.

[Antoninus]

He who trades liberty for safety deserves neither.

So for you, liberty is the ability to buy a porno mag and masturbate. Is that it? Yeah, I'd lay down my life for that kind of "freedom."

[thinking]

are you sure that you are on the proper forum?...your post sure smacks of delusional liberal rhetoric...the sort of knee-jerk reaction, that anything conservative, is hostile in its intent....I recommend that you reread the Cardinals words...