Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MCCAIN INTRODUCES FIRST EVER A LA CARTE BILL
Sen. McCain ^ | 6.7.06 | Sen McCain

Posted on 06/07/2006 10:31:14 AM PDT by meandog

Washington, D.C. ­– Today, U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) introduced the Consumers Having Options in Cable Entertainment (CHOICE) Act of 2006. The bill is designed to encourage broadcasters and cable companies that own cable channels to sell their channels individually to subscribers. It also promotes cable channel distribution over the Internet.

Attached are Senator McCain’s floor statement that was submitted for the record today, a copy of the bill, the bill summary, and a copy of the of the opinion editorial by Senator McCain and FCC Chairman Martin as it appeared in the Los Angeles Times on May 25, 2006.

(Excerpt) Read more at mccain.senate.gov ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: again; ask; mccain; me; names; same; tell; the; you
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Give him credit: Good news for boobtubers...
1 posted on 06/07/2006 10:31:21 AM PDT by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: meandog

Unless this affects satellite TV as well... yawn.


2 posted on 06/07/2006 10:32:13 AM PDT by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

I'm not so sure this is good and definelty not so sure it will save me money on my cable bill?


3 posted on 06/07/2006 10:32:41 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Well anything McCain does......I expect my cable bill to double.


4 posted on 06/07/2006 10:33:41 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
If nothing else, camera whore McCain knows that falling to his knees before cable execs will get him more face-time on the Sunday talk shows, and that's what this is all about, because McCain sure doesn't care about anything or anyone besides McCain..
5 posted on 06/07/2006 10:34:22 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Bet you that it will cost me more to pick a la carte for 15-20 good channels that it already does for their 180 Package (which includes plenty of music that I don't listen to -- I have a radio for that.)

TS

6 posted on 06/07/2006 10:34:28 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Without spoilers, do you think (blabberblabber) killed (mumblemumble) or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

There's only about 5 satellite channels that I ever watch, and I'm guessing that many people are just like me. Not that they watch the same 5 channels that I watch, but that they have a strong preference in what they watch, and that those preferences can be fulfilled by a relatively small number of channels. The satellite/cable companies must be very worried about this.


7 posted on 06/07/2006 10:35:19 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Oh this whole cable thing is just a distraction from not getting the real work of the country done.

</sarcasm>

8 posted on 06/07/2006 10:35:19 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Without spoilers, do you think (blabberblabber) killed (mumblemumble) or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

So to paraphrase Senator Dorgan, Senator Durban, et al, "We have soldiers dying in Iraq, high gas prices, unaffordable health care, etc. but we're worrying about private citizen's TV rates!"

Senator McCain, I hope every bill you introduce goes down to defeat. You cannot be trusted.


9 posted on 06/07/2006 10:36:22 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

He may be doing the right thing, but it is probably for the wrong reasons. But desperately ambitious men commit desperate acts. And with the record of the superelitist crowd in the Senate, desperation mixed with unbridled ambition is about the only thing that might move any of them to do the right thing.


10 posted on 06/07/2006 10:36:37 AM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
If nothing else, camera whore McCain knows that falling to his knees before cable execs will get him more face-time on the Sunday talk shows, and that's what this is all about, because McCain sure doesn't care about anything or anyone besides McCain..

Does this mean you're going to vote for the Hildabeaste in '08?

11 posted on 06/07/2006 10:36:59 AM PDT by meandog (If I were to draw the odious Islamic prophet Muhammad, he would have horns, a tail, and a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meandog

You should invest now in the technology that will bring what is the future of TV. On Demand.


12 posted on 06/07/2006 10:37:00 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Bandar Bush in 08: Continue the Legacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Recall McCain. He always does this, he does 10 or 12 things to stomp on the constitution then he trys to throw the serfs a bone now and then. Just start the recall it may work since he was the main proponent of giving social security benefits and amnesty to ID theft felons.


13 posted on 06/07/2006 10:37:02 AM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Bread and circuses


14 posted on 06/07/2006 10:37:13 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

It would be better news for boob tubers if the feds left their hands off it. Let consumer demand dictate how the cable companies operate.


15 posted on 06/07/2006 10:38:39 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

The Law of Unintended Consequences will prevail. Prices will go up, choices will go down, and McVain will portray himself as the champion of the people....


16 posted on 06/07/2006 10:38:59 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Conservatives embrace American exceptionalism; liberals despise it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

A bill to ENCOURAGE cable companies means what? Will there be some sort of INCENTIVE, if not then I expect nothing to change EXCEPT that if the Cable Companies decide to provide us with the CHOICE, your cable bill will INCREASE as you DECREASE the number of channels you receive?


17 posted on 06/07/2006 10:39:33 AM PDT by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
I figure, anything anybody does, it's going to raise my cable bill. Channels a la carte? My cable bill goes up. No channels a la carte? My cable bill goes up. A yak poops in Outer Mongolia? My cable bill goes up.

The only thing that's going to break the ever-rising spiral of cable prices is for municipalities to stop granting monopolies and allow multiple cable companies to COMPETE in the same geographic area. In the places where it's been tried, rates have gone down. Right now, for example, in Henrico County, VA (suburban Richmond), I'm on Comcast, and as far as I'm aware they are the only cable provider allowed in Henrico County. I have no problems with their TV or Internet service, I'm quite pleased with it. But if I had the choice of, say, them or Time Warner, and they had to directly compete with each other? I bet I wouldn't be paying $111 a month for digital cable and high-speed broadband.

}:-)4

18 posted on 06/07/2006 10:42:14 AM PDT by Moose4 (Please don't call me "white trash." I prefer "Caucasian recyclable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: meandog

But, but, but if everyone does this, cable channels no one watches won't survive. Why, this is just another Wal-Mart putting mom and pop TV stations out of business!

Is bundling channels, forcing us to gobble up the good and bad, socialism? Or is socialism forcing private companies to market their wares as government dictates? Actually, it's the latter.


19 posted on 06/07/2006 10:42:29 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
So to paraphrase Senator Dorgan, Senator Durban, et al, "We have soldiers dying in Iraq, high gas prices, unaffordable health care, etc. but we're worrying about private citizen's TV rates!"

Well, Dorgan's mama was a floozie, Durbin's mama was a whore...and neither RAT would be here if the rubbahs hadn't tore!

20 posted on 06/07/2006 10:42:35 AM PDT by meandog (If I were to draw the odious Islamic prophet Muhammad, he would have horns, a tail, and a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson