A Game of Truth-or-Dare [Michael Reagan was molested by a camp counselor]

P-Fox Website ^ | 6/6/06 | Michael Reagan

[Antoninus]

If you convince me of its relevance.

I'm asking because it's nice to have a philosophical basis upon which to tailor the discussion. My line of argument will be different based on whether you believe that human beings possess an indestructible soul that continues to exist after we die, or if you think that we are just biological machines that revert to nothingness after death.

[ichabod1]

"We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us."

[Antoninus]

"We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us."

Did you just write that? What's the source?

It really hits the nail right on the head. Perhaps the most damaging thing the homo-promo movement has done is to poison male relationships. Whoever thought we'd come to a day where two guys having dinner together are automatically assumed to be sodomizing each other?

[DBeers]

Thank you for the post and ping.

[DBeers]

Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search [ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Good informative read. Hits the nail on the head regarding specifically the need to legitimately discriminate against those suffering the homosexual disorder e.g. no homosexual male Boy Scout Leaders...

[Nice50BMG]

Whoever thought we'd come to a day where two guys having dinner together are automatically assumed to be sodomizing each other?

Exactly. I have a business partner who works near San Francisco. I can't call him my "partner" any more. So he's now my "associate". And we don't go anywhere "nice" for dinner... just the two of us. That would be a date.

What the heck is wrong with the world. God, bring your justice quickly!

[Antoninus]

Exactly. I have a business partner who works near San Francisco. I can't call him my "partner" any more. So he's now my "associate". And we don't go anywhere "nice" for dinner... just the two of us. That would be a date.

My business partner is now my "colleague" for exactly that reason.

What the heck is wrong with the world. God, bring your justice quickly!

The kiddies are running the estate--the kiddies in question being the perpetually adolescent flower children of the 1960s.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

In any debate, if you can argue the latter, the former is just a bonus.
If you cannot argue the latter, the former is not likely to stand to scrutiny either.

[John O]

And we don't go anywhere "nice" for dinner... just the two of us. That would be a date.

Hooters should still be safe.

[fatima]

Thank you Antoninus.God bless him. Wow .

[Antoninus]

In any debate, if you can argue the latter, the former is just a bonus. If you cannot argue the latter, the former is not likely to stand to scrutiny either.

Look, is it so hard for you to express your belief publicly without so much tap-dancing? Here, look how easy it is:

I believe that the human being is made up of body and soul, both created by Almighty God.

I don't like debating with people who refuse to put their core beliefs out on the table.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

I don't like debating with people who refuse to put their core beliefs out on the table.

I don't like debating with someone who has to tailor their argument to a POV or make the other party part of the argument. Logic is on your side or it isn't. Argue in the alternative if you like, as long as they don't contradict each other. It will immediately become clear if the disagreement is a matter of logic or assumptions. If you disagree with something I said, then disagree with it. Don't keep asking me to give you something else to disagree with.

[Antoninus]

I don't like debating with someone who has to tailor their argument to a POV or make the other party part of the argument.

Who said I did? What sense does it make for me to debate with you as if you were a Catholic if you're an atheist? There is no accusation in this. I just want to have a better idea of what I'm up against.

If you disagree with something I said, then disagree with it. Don't keep asking me to give you something else to disagree with.

Good heavens. If you feel it's absolutely necessary to argue behind a smoke screen, there's no point in even bothering. Good day.