Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse; wtc911
Your accusations are prove false. Clinging to them indicates you want to believe the accusations and merely tune out any evidence that does not validate your emotion based opinions.

Sorry but that renders you completely irrelevant on this topic. You simple will NOT listen to the evidence because you simply refused to admit you are wrong. Sorry but the rest of us have better things to do then to listen to your ignore. Your screaming the lies louder and louder do not make them true.

The accusation made by you and others that the Marines shot these people with deliberate aimed fire inside the building they were in is proven to be a lie by the video. IF that child in the video is shot in the manner YOU claim by the weapons the Marines carry, there is NO way he can be alive. It is a physical impossibility. Since the PHYSICAL evidence presented directly refutes the accusers claims, it proves them to be a liars.

So why are you two clinging to the lie?

96 posted on 06/07/2006 3:08:00 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (I would rather be an Iraqi in a Hidatha guarded by Marines, then a subject of Al-Qeda anywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie
Your accusations are prove false.

No, they aren't.

You simple will NOT listen to the evidence because you simply refused to admit you are wrong.

The evidence is that false reports were submitted up the chain of command. The question is "why." The innocent explanations proposed do not meet minimum standards of credibility.

The accusation made by you and others that the Marines shot these people with deliberate aimed fire inside the building they were in is proven to be a lie by the video.

No, it is not proven to be a lie.

IF that child in the video is shot in the manner YOU claim by the weapons the Marines carry, there is NO way he can be alive.

The 5.56 NATO round is notorious for not doing fatal injury, and this has been the subject of numerous complaints by troops in the field, which is why the Army was looking at a 6.8mm round a couple years ago.

It is a physical impossibility.

Again: a friend of mine in Vietnam took a 7.62x39 Soviet round in the center of the back, and he's alive and and well. The 7.62x39 has much better terminal ballistics than the 5.56 NATO round does.

One counterexample has completely undone your entire argument.

Since the PHYSICAL evidence presented directly refutes the accusers claims, it proves them to be a liars.

The physical evidence does not refute the claim at all, you merely wish that it did.

97 posted on 06/07/2006 3:13:42 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
I told you jonny, post any post of mine where I wrote what you say I did and I'll quit FR forever....are you willing to bet? If you can't do it then will you leave?

Go ahead, I'm waiting.

104 posted on 06/07/2006 3:38:33 PM PDT by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson