Congressman William Jefferson D-La., speaks at the swearing in ceremony for Mayor Ray Nagin at the Morial Convention Center in New Orleans on Thursday June 1, 2006. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Posted on 06/06/2006 5:15:58 PM PDT by Libloather
Rep. accused of trying to bribe Nigerian
By STEPHEN MANNING, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 28 minutes ago
GREENBELT, Md. - Rep. William Jefferson called the package he allegedly delivered at midnight to the suburban Maryland home of Nigeria's vice president "African art." Authorities say the "art" was meant to be cash — lots of it.
Court documents filed in the bribery probe of the Louisiana Democrat allege that Jefferson told an FBI informant he took the "art," which authorities believe was code for $100,000 in $100 bills, to the Potomac home of Atiku Abubakar on July 31.
The money was allegedly part of $500,000 the Nigerian vice president sought in return for helping smooth the way for a technology venture in Nigeria that was arranged by Jefferson. Abubakar also reportedly wanted a large stake of the profits from the new business.
The day after he was to have delivered the money, provided by an FBI informant, Jefferson was recorded telling the informant: "I gave him the African art that you gave me and he was very pleased."
The conversation and details of the alleged deal were included in an affidavit filed in August in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt to secure a warrant to search Abubakar's house. The affidavit was unsealed Monday.
It is unclear whether any money was given to Abubakar, who is identified only as "the vice president of Nigeria" in the affidavit.
According to another search warrant affidavit for Jefferson's congressional office, released last month in Washington, $90,000 in cash was found in a freezer at Jefferson's Washington home. A briefcase similar to the one Jefferson is alleged to have used to carry the money was found in a later search of his New Orleans home, according to federal court documents filed there.
The 39-page affidavit released Monday in Maryland, some sections of which remain sealed, identifies the Potomac home as the residence of Jennifer Douglas, Abubakar's wife. Although the search of the residence was mentioned in documents previously released by the courts, names and titles were blacked out to keep them secret.
A lawyer for Abubakar, who is running for president of Nigeria, said Abubakar is cooperating with authorities. Edward L. Weidenfeld said Abubakar's relationship with Jefferson did not extend beyond standard diplomatic meetings.
"There is no relationship or any kind of arrangement of any sort between them," Weidenfeld said.
In Nigeria, where Abubakar kicked off his campaign last week, his spokesman Mohammed Yakubu said they have yet to see details of the allegations. "We don't have anything to say until we have seen these reports or allegations," he said by telephone from Abuja.
Jefferson has strongly denied wrongdoing in the alleged scheme.
The informant was a northern Virginia businesswoman identified by law enforcement officials as Lori Mody. She is said to have gone to the FBI when she believed Jefferson and others were defrauding her on the business deal. Jefferson discussed with her the "payment of bribes to high-ranking foreign government officials," including Abubakar, according to the affidavit.
Jefferson approached Abubakar, claiming he wanted to help an American firm invest $50 million to run Internet services over the wires of Nigerian telecom company Nitel. The venture was to include Mody, a Kentucky telecommunications company called iGate Inc., and the Nigerian firm Rosecom.Net.
The affidavit states Jefferson wanted a stake of 5 percent to 7 percent in the Nigerian venture for his five daughters and one of them, lawyer Jamila Jefferson, to be retained to help set it up.
The congressman met July 18 with Abubakar in Potomac and the vice president "agreed to help secure the necessary approvals" for iGate to begin work in Nigeria, Jefferson said. In return, Abubakar wanted at least 50 percent of the profits from Rosecom.Net and a payment of up to $500,000 before the deal was completed, the documents alleged.
Jefferson, who represents most of New Orleans, has served in Congress since 1990. The raid on his Capitol Hill office sparked outrage from congressional leaders who claimed the Bush administration was violating the separation of powers doctrine. President Bush later sealed FBI files on the raid for 45 days.
Former Jefferson aide Brett Pfeffer has pleaded guilty and was given an eight-year term for his role in the bribery scandal. He is cooperating with authorities. Vernon Jackson, chief executive of iGate, also pleaded guilty to paying more than $400,000 in bribes to Jefferson.
I guess he got one of those emails too?
Willie's probably the source of all those Nigerian email scams.
He'll probably claim he was trying to sting one of those Nigerian scam artists/s
No two ways about it, that's gonna leave a mark. Too late to put ice on it.
Like his "Dollar Bill" nickname. Says a lot about the voters in his district, too.
Trying to find a place to escape to before he gets put in the BIG HOUSE for 20 years!
Q. How do you know when someone is completely and utterly crooked?
A. When he's more crooked than the Nigerians he associates with.
Hoyer backs Pelosi, smacks Rep. Jefferson
By Josephine Hearn
The chances that Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) will keep his seat on the powerful Ways and Means Committee grew slimmer yesterday as House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) issued a stinging assessment of the embattled Louisianan’s legal situation.
“He sits on a tax-writing committee, and he had $90,000 found in his freezer. I think he’s got a tax problem if nothing else,” Hoyer said, responding to reporters’ questions about whether Democrats would seek to oust Jefferson forcibly from the panel even though he has yet to be charged with a crime.
Jefferson pointedly declined a recent request from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for him to step down, reasserting his innocence and implying that she should ask the same of Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.) who has faced ethics questions about earmarks he obtained on the Appropriations Committee.
“If members are to be treated equally, I think Mr. Mollohan has an appropriations problem,” a Democratic aide sympathetic to Jefferson fumed.
Last night, members of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee were expected to discuss Jefferson’s dilemma at a members-only meeting. If Pelosi were to remove Jefferson forcibly, she would first have to put the issue to a vote of that body, which has jurisdiction over Democrats’ committee assignments. That vote was not expected to occur last night, but she could pursue it at a later date.
Last night’s meeting was convened to discuss Democratic message crafting, with Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) acting as chairman. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) typically chairs meetings in which committee assignments are decided.
Hoyer said yesterday that he hoped the committee would seek to oust Jefferson.
“I personally believe that Mr. Jefferson should step down from the Ways and Means Committee, and if he doesn’t step down our caucus should take action.”
If Democratic leaders do put the issue to a vote, Jefferson will have few allies on the committee. It is stocked with Pelosi loyalists.
Even among the committee’s 10 members from the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), Jefferson would be hard-pressed for friends. Reps. James Clyburn (D-S.C.), chairman of the Democratic caucus, and Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), senior Democrat on Ways and Means, have not rushed to his aid.
Several more junior CBC members, however, may speak out on his behalf. Rep. Donald Payne (D-N.J.) has been supportive, even though he occupies one of the 15 slots appointed by Pelosi on the steering committee.
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) sits on the panel as a regional representative. He may harbor some lingering ill will against Pelosi because she backed Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.) when the two were vying to become a vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
A spokesperson for Meeks could not immediately comment.
Hoyer’s call for Jefferson to step aside marks only the latest time he has vociferously supported a Pelosi decision. The whip has at times been at odds with Pelosi, his onetime leadership rival. Pelosi bested Hoyer in a race for Democratic whip in 2002.
These days, however, Hoyer says he has only unalloyed endorsements for the minority leader and her ability to unify the caucus.
“Nancy has worked harder in my opinion than anybody I have seen in my 26 years in Congress,” Hoyer averred yesterday. “[Former Minority Leader] Dick Gephardt [D-Mo.] I thought was the hardest worker I could find. Nancy works harder than Dick. She travels more. She raises more money. She works harder than message. She’s doing a wonderful job.
“If we lose, it will not be Nancy Pelosi’s fault. She’s done everything she possibly could to insure our victory. ... Win, lose or draw, she’s going to be our leader.”
Hoyer was responding to a recent report that Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, may mount a challenge to Pelosi if Democrats fall short of taking control of the House.
Emanuel said, “Congresswoman Pelosi is the leader. I’m not interested in [challenging her], and I support her.”
In a moment of levity, Hoyer quipped that the question may be a “moot point.”
“If we don’t take back the House after the situation we’re in now, we’re all going to shoot ourselves in the head!” he quipped, then added, “I didn’t mean it literally. Put your hopes aside.”
Pelosi is virtually assured of becoming Speaker unopposed if Democrats take control. Despite some concerns among Democrats that she is a poor spokeswoman for the party, the caucus is unlikely to miss the chance to elect the first female Speaker or to reward her for ending a dozen years in the political doldrums.
Even if Democrats do fall short of taking power, it is unclear who would challenge Pelosi. Hoyer has said time and again that he has no desire to take her on again. Emanuel, while seen as hardworking, smart and effective, has little seniority and has engendered ill will in some factions of the caucus with his colorful and direct language.
Mollohan is the paradigm crooked Congressman using earmarks and "foundations" for government fraud. All of the House earmarks should be examined for fraud----and all of their "foundations."
On a congressman's salary, Rep. Alan Mollohan's (D-W.Va.) net worth increased from about $100,000 in 2000 to $11.4 million in 2005, at the same time he was directing millions of government dollars in "earmarks" to nonprofit organizations in his district that are run by his business partner and some campaign contributors.
Duh----can you say kickbacks?
A closer examination revealed that Mollohan and his wife had more than $2,000,000 in real estate investments with Mollohan’s former staffer, Laura Kuhns, and her husband.
Kuhns also ran a nonprofit, Vandalia Heritage Foundation, which had received more than $28 million in Congressional appropriations earmarks with Mollohan's help from 2000 through 2005. Kuhns was also on the board of other nonprofit groups which had received over $100 million in earmarks of federal funds during the same period with Mollohan's help.
Mollohan's 2000 Financial Disclosure Report listed his income-producing assets as being worth from $179,012 to $562,000 with liabilities of $170,000 to $465,000. Among the liabilities was Visa credit card debt listed as $45,003 to $150,000. Just four years later, Mollohan's 2004 Financial Disclosure Report showed him with assets worth $6,313,025 to $24,947,000 offset by liabilities in the $3,665,011 to $13,500,000 range. It also showed him owning an oceanfront beach house on Bald Head Island, NC which was valued at $1,000,000 to $5,000,000. NLPC found that Mollohan was renting the beach house during the summer of 2005 for $11,975 a week.
Freedom of Information Act documents revealed thousands of pages of real estate, financial and legal documents. Slowly a picture of Mollohan's finances emerged that was sharply different from the one being portrayed in Mollohan’s Financial Disclosure Reports.
Using NPO's to siphon off monies is a classic swindle. The IRS has documented numerous financial scams by so-called "non-profits" and "foundations." Any number of financial frauds can be hidden in a non-profit (or Foundation) by calculatedly wrapping oneself in high-minded ideals with the intent of engaging in tax fraud.
The IRS should determine whether Mollohan's NPO is properly accounting for all its activities derived from government grants, and whether it is inflating legal costs, and whether it is using government grants for the purposes stated. Taxpayers need to know whether this NPO is engaged in Enron-style accounting and spending practices using government grants---which could be grounds for government fraud charges.
Let's tell it like it is----"earmarking" the practice of adding on to a Congressional appropriations bill ---- to fund a Congressman's own "foundation" is government fraud. Period.
I'm wondering when Dingy Harry Reid's number comes up...
Tick-tock, tick-tock........
Mark
He was mayor of KC, and led what was probably the most corrupt city government since the Pendergast era.
And yes, he's Black.
Mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.