Posted on 06/06/2006 5:13:56 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
MSM doesn't "think"
Neck? She has a neck?
What took you so long?
Hey, your liberal slip is showing Professor.
Matt would wet his panties if he saw that!..........
Book Review: Coulter Attacks the Cult of Liberalism
Human Events ^ | June 5, 2006 | Lisa De Pasquale
Posted on 06/05/2006 6:46:45 AM PDT by boryeulb
In "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," HUMAN EVENTS legal affairs correspondent Ann Coulter lays out one of the most original and perceptive philosophies on the cult of liberalism.
She states, "Under the guise of not favoring religion, liberals favor one cosmology over another and demand total indoctrination into theirs. The state religion of liberalism demands obeisance (to the National Organization for Women), tithing (to teachers' unions), reverence (for abortion), and formulaic imprecations ('Bush lied, kids died!'' 'Keep your laws off my body!' 'Arms for hostages!'). Everyone is taxed to support indoctrination into the state religion through public schools where innocent children are taught a specific belief system, rather than, say, math."
Get Yours FREE!
For years liberals have relied on a strategy of faking out the American public in order to win elections. Instead of accurately articulating their beliefs and engaging in an honest debate, they scour the nation for the perfect patsy. A hysterical mother who is willing to go on national television and call the President a "furor" and "evil maniac" is akin to seeing the stigmata. Liberals' ecstasy over Cindy Sheehan, Max Cleland, and the widows who made a spectacle of themselves in the midst of the 9/11 Commission epitomizes their secret weapon for winning back America -- a doctrine of infallibility in which victory goes to the most hysterical.
As Coulter writes:
Finally, the Democrats hit on an ingenious strategy: They would choose only messengers whom we're not allowed to reply to. Thats why all Democratic spokesmen these days are sobbing, hysterical women. You can't respond to them because that would be questioning the authenticity of their suffering. Liberals haven't changed the message, just the messenger. All the most prominent liberal spokesmen are people with "absolute moral authority" -- Democrats with a dead husband, a dead child, a wife who works at the CIA, a war record, terminal illness, or as a last resort, being on a first-name basis with Nelson Mandela. Like Oprah during Sweeps Week, liberals have come to rely exclusively on people with sad stories...CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
That was damn good fight-trolling. Pity you have been proven completely wrong.
Yeah, no shooting glasses or navel showing!
GLGB: I admire your ability to watch and report on that show every day, but this interview on this day had to make it all worthwhile.
Begging the question, petitio principii. An appeal to authority. An appeal to the people. An unproven assertion.
"The Republican party thinks its base of social conservatives is a nest of dummies who have no memories and respond like bulls whenever red flags are waved in their faces."
Unproven assertion. Begging the question. Ad hominem attack.
Yeah, Lauer is some "journalist."
Bwaa haaa haaa! Weak? Oh man, that is rich. Hey Pet, ever heard of irony? If anything on this entire forum were weak, it is your reply at #39.
The Most Impressive Thing About Ann Coulter.....ANN COULTER!
Seriously, this is a point that is not made often enough. Iraq is part of the WOT. Iraq is part of the WOT. Iraq is part of the WOT. Iraq is part of the WOT.
Rinse, lather, repeat.
Thanks, Ed. Yes, days like today are very rewarding. It wasn't just idle, hostile sparring between the two. It was Ann absolutely routing Lauer with logic and principle. And I got to watch and report!
How dare anyone criticize the great Ann!
And yet, you do not address the point of my post, you only claim it is wrong. Hmmm. Very interesting. If I were so wrong, even the likes of you could explain why "I consider them the same..." is rhetorically stronger than "They are the same..."
They're here laot. Reading comprehension problem?
Human Events also says they're going to have an interview with Ann posted tomorrow.See also THIS thread:
On The Seventh Day, God Rested And Liberals Schemed
(Godless Special Preview Alert)
Townhall.com ^ | 06/06/06 | Ann Coulter
Posted on 06/05/2006 10:06:45 PM PDT by goldstategop
GODLESS: The Church of Liberalism, Chapter One On the Seventh Day, God Rested and Liberal Schemed
They exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creation rather than the Creator. . . . Therefore, God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature.Romans 1:2526
Liberals love to boast that they are not religious, which is what one would expect to hear from the state-sanctioned religion. Of course liberalism is a religion. It has its own cosmology, its own miracles, its own beliefs in the supernatural, its own churches, its own high priests, its own saints, its own total worldview, and its own explanation of the existence of the universe. In other words, liberalism contains all the attributes of what is generally known as religion.
Under the guise of not favoring religion, liberals favor one cosmology over another and demand total indoctrination into theirs. The state religion of liberalism demands obeisance (to the National Organization for Women), tithing (to teachers unions), reverence (for abortion), and formulaic imprecations (Bush lied, kids died! Keep your laws off my body! Arms for hostages!). Everyone is taxed to support indoctrination into the state religion through the public schools, where innocent children are taught a specific belief system, rather than, say, math.
Liberal doctrines are less scientifically provable than the story of Noahs ark, but their belief system is taught as fact in government schools, while the Biblical belief system is banned from government schools by law. As a matter of faith, liberals believe: Darwinism is a fact, people are born gay, child-molesters can be rehabilitated, recycling is a virtue, and chastity is not. If people are born gay, why hasnt Darwinism weeded out people who dont reproduce? (For that, we need a theory of survival of the most fabulous.) And if gays cant change, why do liberals think child-molesters can? Pedophilia is a sexual preference. If theyre born that way, instead of rehabilitation, how about keeping them locked up? Why must children be taught that recycling is the only answer? Why arent we teaching children safe littering?
We arent allowed to ask...
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
It's like watching an accomplished fencer toy with an enraged yeoman.
Thanks for the link.
"All too often the "conservative" guest buys into the premise and thereby distorts the argument."
Exactly.
And this is the key to refuting liberals' lies. You must reject their premise, which thanks to a cooperative mass media in the last two generations, has become accepted fact.
This fundamental disagreement with liberals at the root perception of the way the world works, is why I can no longer tolerate the company of the Left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.