Posted on 06/06/2006 5:13:56 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
That might be a stretch.
Man you have no idea who wrong you've got this. You are forgetting that the station has him wired with an ear piece to feed him answers and questions when they want to from people that are supposedly brilliant.
So this wasn't just Lauer talking, this was also the best the brain trust at NBC could throw at Ann and they were terribly lacking in trying to keep up with her.
Good luck Ann with the book and increasing your personal wealth while giving us good read and show!
Great report! Thanks, as always, for the ping.
Thanks, Lancey - glad you enjoyed it. Ann was truly in rare form this morning.
Luke tried to pick a fight by calling Bush supporters "bots", liberals, and open borders people. Then tying it into their supposed disdain for Coulter.
You two Bush supporters said you won't and haven't attacked Ann. Let me ask you this, are you liberals and are you for open borders? Cause that's what Luke also said about you (all Bush supporters).
As for me, I like Ann sometimes and sometimes not. She is powerful for our cause in her way, but sometimes I disagree with her approach and if so, I don't mind saying it.
I'm for a fence or wall on the border.
I'm prolife, pro second amendment, pro military and before Bush won the nomination in 2000 my candidates were going to be either Dan Quayle or Phil Gramm. I also proudly support and respect the current President...in general, if not in every detail on every issue. I don't know anyone I'm THAT in sync with.
I feel like Ann Coulter to Luke's Matt Lauer. What was that Luke said about liberal Bush bot open borders anti Coulter people? Never mind, it already isn't a fair fight and I'll stop right here.
Yeah....Bush seems hypocritical when he doesn't take strong action on illegals. He's fighting terror all over the world and yet is all for immigration to walk right over in our country without a second thought.
Coulter: "I consider them the same thing. We didn't invade Guatemala." ]
LoL..... only missing is the Duuuugh.. <<- but was implied...
I don't know anyone I'm THAT in sync with.
BINGO, I don't either. One thing I was a little dismayed with Ann about was when she was so strident against the Miers nom. It wasn't because I disgreed with her, but she was getting on my nerves screeching about it. She was right, though.
No worries, it was funny.
One might ask why the ludicrously named "Republican Majority for Choice" requests "festive attire" at their award ceremonies.
Yes the post did indicate just exactly that. That if you "trash" Ann you must be a lib, and that was aimed specifically at FReepers. But added to it was that it's pro Bush "libs" "trashing" her, plus these are the same ones who are for open borders.
My post showed clearly I'm no lib - pro life, pro gun, pro military (forgot to add pro tax cuts) and supported Quayle or Gramm before Bush in 2000. I support a fence on the border, exactly what Tom DeLay supports. I don't trash Ann...but like you, might disagree with her approach at times.
At the same time, I support this President! I don't know anyone I'm completely in sync with on all details of everything, and you say the same is true of you. We make sense!!!
I don't know. In that context the topic was having the courtesy, decency, (and I guess to some extent the balls), when you mention another poster to ping that poster to the comment. To mention a poster without pinging him/her to the comment is discourteous (and might also be interpreted as cowardly talking behind the person's back).
If you're not too busy being obtuse, review your post #161. Some people would regard that post as obscene, while others would just regard it as profane. Either way, you manage to make your opponent appear the intellectual superior in your argument.
Don't be embarrassed. It's not everyday that a typo makes you look like a rather cunning linguist.
Congratulations!
http://www.jaygaskill.com/liberalismasreligion.htm
WHY DISCUSSIONS WITH THE PARTISAN “LIBERAL” LEFT ARE LIKE CONVERSATIONS WITH RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISTS:
For Them, Political Liberalism is a Secular Religion
An Irreverent Analysis
by
Jay B. Gaskill
Copyright © 2004 by Jay B. Gaskill
He is referring to me. If he was referring to Cindy Sheehan, I'd have to examine his brain and her eyes as well!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.