[MACVSOG68]

Using common sense, who is more likely to sexually abuse a child, someone who consciously describes their core identity based on what they do with their genitals, or someone who doesn't?

Statistics show that 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 7 boys are molested sometime during their childhood. I read an article that indicated somewhere around 98 percent of child pornography involves either girls or girls with boys. That does not comport with your conclusion.

Here's a real one for you: Do you think that children should be taught that homosexual relationships are good, natural, healthy, and proper?

No I don't. Nor do I believe you can hide the fact that homosexuals exist. In some states you will find children of homosexual couples in school. I prefer the schools not take any position on such relationships, but leave moral discussions like that to parents. If my child came home with a textbook that displayed a nontraditional home, I would talk about it with my children.

[Antoninus]

Statistics show that 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 7 boys are molested sometime during their childhood.

Your unsourced statistic does not mention who is doing the molesting of each. I'm willing to bet that homosexuals have more molesters among their numbers, per capita, than the rest of the population. And regardless, my opinion is that any sexual deviant, be they a homosexual, a prostitute, a rapist, or a pedophile, should be precluded from adopting children.

I read an article that indicated somewhere around 98 percent of child pornography involves either girls or girls with boys. That does not comport with your conclusion.

Oh, well if you say so based on a totally unsourced anecdote, who can contradict you?

I prefer the schools not take any position on such relationships, but leave moral discussions like that to parents.

Wouldn't we all. But here in the real world, they're not neutral on it at all. In fact, they're insisting on being in your kids' face about it. If you've been following the situation in Massachusetts at all--the secret "fisting" education sessions, etc.--you'll have a better idea of what we're up against. The homo-radicals DEMAND access to your children and they'll attempt to punish you if you resist.

If my child came home with a textbook that displayed a nontraditional home, I would talk about it with my children.

And that's the difference between you and me. I will not allow my child to be put into a situation where they could be presented with this material in the first place.

[DBeers]

Nor do I believe you can hide the fact that homosexuals exist.

That is the oft quoted and paraphrased: "we're here, we're queer, deal with it" leftist argument...

HOWEVER, science has as yet to identify ANYTHING innately homosexual...

No one can hide the "fact" that homosexual activity exists...

No one can hide the "fact" that there are some who feel and who claim a predisposition to engage in homosexual activity who exist...

However, there are as yet NO "homosexuals" as you imply identified by any credible science found to exist anywhere... IF there were as you claim THEN there would not be any legitimate premise for clintoons DADT (don't ask don't tell) policy in regards to the military...

Results: Propaganda 0 Reality +1