Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/30/2006 6:08:53 AM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NapkinUser
Which leads us to the second insight: the strange pro-amnesty coalition consists, therefore, principally of Democrats. Should anger over the immigration debacle cause the Senate, or especially the House, to fall into Democrat’s hands in the November elections, the result will be an unstoppable march toward amnesty and massive, unimaginable increases in both legal and illegal immigration.

Look, it's simple. If immigration is important to you, then research the voting record of who is running for Senate and House of representatives in your district. If they are pro-American sovereignty, vote them in. If they aren't, vote for someone else who is. Party doesn't need to enter into it.
2 posted on 05/30/2006 6:16:18 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
The 23 Republican Senators that voted for the amnesty, by contrast, have a lifetime rating from the American Conservative Union of just 77 out of 100, a full 14 points lower.

This article is crap. Any politician that scores a 77 on the ACU meter is ok by me.

I also noticed, the author did not give the avg. ACU score for the democrats which is probably about 10.

3 posted on 05/30/2006 6:19:27 AM PDT by staytrue (Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

Amen, Fight harder, don't give up.

Work for those representatives who will put a kabosh on this travesty.

Remove the likes of Mclame and the rest of his kennedy loving buddies and send them home with a pink slip.


4 posted on 05/30/2006 6:19:46 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (In a world where Carpenters come back from the dead, ALL things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

According to FOXNEWS yesterday
a.m., Congressmen/Senators went
home for the holiday expecting
their constituents to be asking
WHEN is Congress going to get
going on Health Care, Social
Security, etc. They were over-
whelmed by the IMMIGRATION topic
wherever they went!

Gotta get outside the Beltway more
often, boys and girls!


5 posted on 05/30/2006 6:20:43 AM PDT by Grendel9 (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
France is doomed.

America could become another France. If Congress should fall into the hands of Democrats, they will do this to the U.S.A. Make no mistake.

Do not let the Democrats seize power! They will destroy America!

We will deal with the RINOs in the primaries.

6 posted on 05/30/2006 6:20:57 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The Spirit of Flight 93 is the Spirit of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
"Let the pro-amnesty RINOs (El RINOs?) get their support from the illegal aliens they believe they are so wisely courting. Give your support to the Republicans that are still courting you. But above all, do not give up and go away quietly."

Couldn't have put it better myself.
Excellent article.
Forget about the RINO's like the John McCain's and the Lincoln Chafee's.
Go out there and give your strong support (and money) to the anti-amnesty majority Republican congressmen, but keep up the pressure.
The phone calls, faxes, and letters against amnesty of any kind for the illegals must continue unabated.
8 posted on 05/30/2006 6:21:49 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

This is the doing of the Bush dynasty.

Being an age long Republican supporter, I know better than to support anyone whom they propose. When it comes to spending and immigration they are firmly in the illegal-spendit camp.
I do not propose to encumber my progeny with their lawless intentions.


13 posted on 05/30/2006 6:35:40 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

From NationalLedger.com

Commentary
Bush: ‘Read My Lips – No New Amnesty’
By Nicholas Stix
May 29, 2006

When George Herbert Walker Bush was the Republican presidential nominee for the first time, in 1988, he told the Republican National Convention, “Read my lips: No new taxes.” It became his most effective campaign slogan, and one of the keys to his electoral victory.

But Bush the Elder ultimately raised taxes. In 1992, his base responded variously by staying at home or by voting for third-party candidate Ross Perot, thus bringing brought about the election of Bill Clinton.

Immigrants are Our Future

Bush the Younger fancies himself much smarter than his father. Thus, he did not announce, during either of his presidential campaigns, his plan to grant an amnesty to what now amounts to – according to pro-illegal immigration Bear Stearns economists Robert Justich and Betty Ng – over 20 million illegal immigrants plus their parents plus their children plus their siblings plus anyone who will pay them to say they are blood relatives, much less his plan to bring in, according to an analysis by Sen. Jeff Sessions’ (R, AL) staff, another 200 million legal immigrants over the next 20 years, or to mention the tidal wave of new illegal immigration (another 100 million?) this amnesty would bring about. He knew it would cost him the election, if he did. And so, he bided his time.

Well, George W. Bush still isn’t taking any chances, and so when he finally announced his amnesty plan, he did the equivalent of saying, ‘Read my lips: No new amnesty.’ (“What I have just described is not amnesty.”) He figures that if he lies enough about his planned amnesty, people won’t figure it out until it’s too late. “Too late” means after the coming fall elections. And to sweeten the pot for his social and religious conservative base (or as Karl Rove would call it, "the suckers"), he will propose a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

This is all a word game. Bush is simply calling amnesty by other names: “temporary worker program,” “rational middle ground,” etc. He insists that he seeks amnesty, er, rational middle ground only for veteran criminals, but not for rookies.

“That middle ground recognizes that there are differences between an illegal immigrant who crossed the border recently and someone who has worked here for many years, and has a home, a family, and an otherwise clean record.”

And yet, as Bush well knows, under the Treason Plan (known variously as the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act and as S. 2611) he champions and the Senate passed, 62-36, on Thursday, we will end up with amnestied, naturalized, “temporary workers”; amnestied, naturalized, recently arrived illegals; and amnestied, naturalized, long-term illegals. But for treason and democide to prevail, the House must pass its own version. Thus, there is still hope for America.

That Burning Sensation

The man who for years portrayed himself as a straight talker, is peeing on our leg, and telling us that it’s raining.

I voted for George W. Bush in 2000, and again in 2004. As the saying goes, “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.”

I suppose President Bush can tell himself that his proposal isn’t really an illegal immigration “amnesty,” because along with immigration law and America’s borders, he is eliminating the very concept of American citizenship. No legal citizens, no illegal immigrants.

The President says he is sending 6,000 National Guardsmen to the Mexican border, but is sending them unarmed, and in fact, not stationing them on the border at all, but in offices, where they will do “paper work.”

But that’s just a stopgap. Mr. Bush’s plan is, by the end of 2008, for the 6,000 do-nothing National Guardsmen to be replaced by 6,000 new, do-nothing Border Patrol agents. That’s over $400 million of nothing per year, courtesy of the American taxpayer.

If Citizens Didn’t Exist, We’d Have to Invent Them

And yet, the ruling elites will still need something to distinguish themselves from the rest of those whose pockets they’re busy picking. And so, there will still be illegal immigration in-between serial amnesties that will occur every few years, because the elites will demand ever cheaper baby sitters, gardeners, cooks, cleaning ladies, dog walkers, car washers, etc. The elites’ll show how morally superior they are to us paupers who can’t afford illegal servants, by periodically demanding amnesty for their servants. This will also endear them to the servants. Then, as soon as the newest mass amnesty goes through, they’ll fire their newly legalized servants, and replace them for even less with new illegals. (‘I’m sorry, Maria, but I just can’t afford you anymore.’)

Soy Un Yahoo

Neocon godfatherette William Kristol has his own word for commoners: “Yahoos.”

Echoing the Liar-in-Chief, and apparently cognizant that consistency is one of the three laws of lying; Kristol denies that the Bush amnesty plan is, in fact, an amnesty plan. Unfortunately, however, like President Bush, Bill Kristol seems unaware of the first law of lying: Plausibility.

At this rate, George W. Bush’s greatest political achievement will obtain in having rescued Bill Clinton from historical infamy. The Clintons’ reign of crime looks better with each passing day.

Taps?

On Memorial Day, in honoring our war dead from the Revolutionary War unto the War on Terror, we say “Lest we forget.” At Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln exhorted, “that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain.”

In the new dispensation according to George W. Bush, however, those men did die in vain. Bush fully intends to surrender our patrimony.

If the House goes along with the Senate and the People permit it, this Memorial Day will prove to have been a time to grieve for America itself.

The new Bush plan is the ultimate in taxation without representation. It is revolutionary in its provocation and in its consequences. Perhaps we should stop calling the plan’s patron President Bush, and instead start calling him King George.

We the People survived a civil war, but can we survive George W. Bush?


29 posted on 05/30/2006 7:12:53 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

40 posted on 05/30/2006 2:10:11 PM PDT by ArcadeQuarters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson