Disgusting.
1 posted on
05/29/2006 12:45:31 PM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...
MORAL ABSOLUTES PING.DISCUSSION ABOUT:
Irish Supreme Court Strikes Down Age of Sexual Consent Law
Now the left will look for a way to do away with statuatory rape laws altogether.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FReepMail wagglebee.
2 posted on
05/29/2006 12:46:58 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
The courts are out of control everywhere, it seems.
To: wagglebee
These judges are wacky enough to be on the 9th Circuit.
4 posted on
05/29/2006 12:52:19 PM PDT by
BW2221
To: Lazamataz
Ping for you.
I think I read that Aer Lingus is having a sale on airfares to Ireland this week.
5 posted on
05/29/2006 12:52:27 PM PDT by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: Irish_Thatcherite
6 posted on
05/29/2006 12:54:16 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
These guys seem determined to show us that an independent judiciary is simply something that doesn't work.
7 posted on
05/29/2006 12:54:31 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: wagglebee
The ruling resulted from a recent case of a man charged with four counts of statutory rape for having sex with a 14-year-old girl. He was 18 at the time; the girl told him she was 16. Ridiculous. If she lied about her age (and lets face it, some 12 year old girls look 18), and admitted it in court, how can he be charged?
8 posted on
05/29/2006 12:55:41 PM PDT by
CrawDaddyCA
(Free Travis McGee!!)
To: wagglebee
St. Patrick pray for them.
10 posted on
05/29/2006 12:56:34 PM PDT by
AliVeritas
(Murtha, doing the job Marines wouldn't do... on Memorial Day weekend. s/)
To: wagglebee; Happygal; Colosis; Black Line; Cucullain; SomeguyfromIreland; Youngblood; Fergal; ...
It's a terrible thing that convicted offenders are taking advantage of the Irish Supreme Court ruling - but, to be fair, it was bad law considering cases where a teenaged girl lied about her age to an older man - and it couldn't be used as defence in court.
I hope the Irish government bring in a better worded law - except 'Irish government' and 'well-worded law' are mutually exclusive notions...
13 posted on
05/29/2006 1:02:44 PM PDT by
Irish_Thatcherite
(~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~| IRA supporters on FR are trolls, end of story!)
To: wagglebee
The ruling resulted from a recent case of a man charged with four counts of statutory rape for having sex with a 14-year-old girl. He was 18 at the time; the girl told him she was 16. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but the 18-year old male may be entitled to some understanding. I'm not sure he really should be branded a rapists and sex offender for the rest of his life (not to mention serve a long jail term), if this girl really made a plausible claim that she was 15 or 16.
I've got far less sympathy for older males who make the same claim.
To: wagglebee
There's something rotten in Ireland.
To: wagglebee
RTÉ news reported Friday on a 38-year old man convicted of the unlawful carnal knowledge of a 12-year-old girl, two years ago, who was expected to challenge his conviction in court this week. An eighteen year old with a fourteen year old who may or may not have lied about her age is one thing.
This is quite another.
20 posted on
05/29/2006 1:20:27 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Every lady in this land hath 20 nails on each hand five and twenty on hand and feet)
To: wagglebee
Next they'll allow raping of two year old babies.
Ireland is down the sewer.
23 posted on
05/29/2006 1:24:08 PM PDT by
FerdieMurphy
(For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
To: wagglebee
Shouldn't the burden be on the older person to obtain proof of age? Heck, a store that sells tobacco or booze to a minor that lied about their age is still guilty.
Out of wedlock sex should require a higher standard than this.
The gays have a desire to remove all age barriers, this ruling is one of the cases to that end.
24 posted on
05/29/2006 1:26:51 PM PDT by
Raycpa
To: wagglebee
A posting about this a few days ago gave a little better take on the matter. Under the law that was struck down, a defense wasn't allowed if the accused acknowled that the act took place.
In the case that challenged the law the former posting indicated the boy was seventeen and the girl was fifteen though she told him she was sixteen. In that case I think the court's ruling was a good one. If she had been sixteen there wouldn't have been a crime.
25 posted on
05/29/2006 1:29:09 PM PDT by
em2vn
To: wagglebee
The Randall P. McMurphy defense.
27 posted on
05/29/2006 1:34:38 PM PDT by
Oratam
To: wagglebee
... the court did state that "the protection of young girls from engaging in consensual sex is a legitimate end to be pursued by appropriate means,"...
no protection of young boys is needed ?
31 posted on
05/29/2006 1:45:10 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't)
To: wagglebee
Why? We live in a culture that teaches pre teen kids how to have "safe sex." This is the culture that we accept and this is the culture we created.
It is perverse, but it makes sense.
51 posted on
05/29/2006 2:47:39 PM PDT by
Chickensoup
(The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.The water in the pot is getting warmer, froggies.)
To: wagglebee
ruth ginsberg will refer to this because it is in keeping with her personal beliefs.
60 posted on
05/29/2006 3:48:06 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: wagglebee
This law applied to a case with a circumstance which it should have considered and perhaps made an allowance regarding. Unfortunately the court has opened the door for cases which should be criminal under the law such as the 38 yr old and the 12 yr old.
Seems he clearly wanted to know if she was legal age, she lied and apparently admitted it in court.
61 posted on
05/29/2006 4:00:44 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Don't use illegals: HIREPATRIOTS.COM)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson