Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS: Cameraman, Soundman Killed in Iraq, Correspondent Critical
FNC ^ | May 29, 2006

Posted on 05/29/2006 9:18:38 AM PDT by Kaslin

NEW YORK — A cameraman and soundman for CBS were killed and a CBS correspondent was seriously injured Monday after their convoy was struck by a roadside bomb in Iraq, the network said.

Veteran cameraman Paul Douglas, 48, and soundman James Brolan, 42, were killed, CBS reported on its Web site. Correspondent Kimberly Dozier, 39, was in critical condition at a U.S. military hospital in Baghdad after undergoing surgery.

The three were reporting on patrol with the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, when their convoy was hit by an improvised explosive device, CBS said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; US: New York
KEYWORDS: cbs; cbsnews; dozier; embeds; iraq; journalist; reporter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Bulwark

And your solution is?


21 posted on 05/29/2006 10:10:57 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

According to CNN one of our soldiers was killed. See my post #9


22 posted on 05/29/2006 10:12:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
And your solution is?

Well, it's quite clever to say that now. It's like throwing a 747 into a dive and when it's 1000 feet above the ground doing 500+ MPH turning to the copilot and saying "and your solution is?".

Obviously the campaign should have been better managed from the start. More. Boots. On. The. Ground. I can't tell you how often I hear that. There just weren't, and still aren't, enough troops to get the job done.
23 posted on 05/29/2006 10:13:05 AM PDT by Bulwark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
In no way is the army being chewed up by IEDs. We have 130,000 people in Iraq. They kill, what, 2-3 a day when lucky? That is in no way "chewing up a modern army". This is all propaganda and you are falling for it.

As of March '06 we had 19,782 WIA and KIA. IED's don't just kill. A 19 year old sent home alive without an arm is as effective as a kill.

24 posted on 05/29/2006 10:13:24 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
If we don't have the stomach for Iraq, we might as well hoist the green flag of Islam over the White House right now.

What if we just realize we shouldn't hoist in the U.S. flag in the Middle East?

25 posted on 05/29/2006 10:14:33 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

It is still not a major war and they are still not chewing up the forces. You guys are buying into the propaganda. This war has been going on for 3 years. We have a remarkably low rate of casulties.

Don't give up now.


26 posted on 05/29/2006 10:15:02 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

View my posts at

CBS News Team Hit in Baghdad
CBS Website ^ | May 29,2006 | CBS


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1640089/posts


27 posted on 05/29/2006 10:17:51 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

Are you saying we should turn tail and run away now? Today, you are Commander and Chief, you have 130,000 men in Iraq, what do you do? Don't give me platitudes, give me a plan, or stop bad mouthing the generals.


28 posted on 05/29/2006 10:18:29 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark
Re: mismanaged from the start

Utterly False.

Consider the following figures, displayed here for your exclusive reading pleasure.

1) The number of Americans killed by the Iraq Military this year (2006) is zero.

2) The number of Americans killed by the Iraq Military last year (2005) is also zero.

3) The number of Americans killed by the Iraq Military last year is (2004), you guessed it, zero.


The Iraq military, the "worlds 4th largest army" has been defeated.

This is no small accomplishment, and should never be overlooked.

29 posted on 05/29/2006 10:29:12 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

It sounds to me like there are a bunch of people on this thread this morning who run like hell when you bloody their noses. Whether the DemocRATS and the MSM like it or not, Iraq is part of the global war on terror. And you're right. It is a low scale insurgency. When someone is shot in Phoenix, that's all you will see on the news. You don't hear about the million other people who went about their day and only learned of the shooting on the six o'clock news. If it bleeds, it leads.


30 posted on 05/29/2006 10:31:46 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Freedom or a baloney sandwich? A DemocRAT will ALWAYS choose the baloney sandwich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
On a day where we honor our troops I couldn't stomach the thought being distracted by focusing on any members of the disingenuous disgusting drive by media that have helped our enemies with their propaganda campaign.
31 posted on 05/29/2006 10:32:48 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark
More boots on the ground is a load of BS. More boots on the ground in this type of operation equals more targets for IED's.

Most of us know what the solution is for this, but understand both our citizens and the worlds cowards basically will not allow such "tactics".

The Romans knew how to handle this, even though they did not have to deal with a relentlessly seditious media.
32 posted on 05/29/2006 10:32:54 AM PDT by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

Looking Back at Iraq
A war to be proud of.

By Victor Davis Hanson

There may be a lot to regret about the past policy of the United States in the Middle East, but the removal of Saddam Hussein and the effort to birth democracy in his place is surely not one of them. And we should remember that this Memorial Day.

Whatever our righteous anger at Khomeinist Iran, it was wrong, well aside from the arms-for-hostages scandal, to provide even a modicum of aid to Saddam Hussein, the great butcher of his own, during the Iran-Iraq war.

Inviting the fascist Baathist government of Syria into the allied coalition of the first Gulf War meant that we more or less legitimized the Assad regime’s take-over of Lebanon, with disastrous results for its people.

It may have been strategically in error not to have taken out Saddam in 1991, but it was morally wrong to have then encouraged Shiites and Kurds to rise up—while watching idly as Saddam’s reprieved planes and helicopters slaughtered them in the thousands.

A decade of appeasement of Islamic terrorism, with retaliations after the serial attacks—from the first World Trade Center bombing to Khobar Towers and the USS Cole—never exceeding the occasional cruise missile or stern televised lecture, made September 11 inevitable.

Read the rest:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmRiZDliMjI2Y2Y0Yjg2MmUxOWYzMDVhOGM5NzExZjE=




33 posted on 05/29/2006 10:35:21 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark
Bulwark: Obviously the campaign should have been better managed from the start. More. Boots. On. The. Ground. I can't tell you how often I hear that. There just weren't, and still aren't, enough troops to get the job done.

And Bulwark, what are your credentials that make you an expert in war planning over the military? For only 7 high ranking Army that mostly wasn't there, there are were thousands of professional military that agreed.
34 posted on 05/29/2006 10:36:13 AM PDT by encm(ss) (SugarLand delight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark
Obviously the campaign should have been better managed from the start. More. Boots. On. The. Ground. I can't tell you how often I hear that. There just weren't, and still aren't, enough troops to get the job done.

You may be right -- I don't know if there's any way to know for sure.

For what it's worth I'd like to respectfully disagree -- seems to me that more people would have only offered more targets, and would have encouraged the Iraqi people to take less responsibility for their own future.

35 posted on 05/29/2006 10:36:23 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Are you saying we should turn tail and run away now?

I was saying we shouldn't have gone back in 2003 when Freepers were swearing the oil revenues were going to pay for everything and Wolfowitz's wisdowm was taken over Shinseki's.

Today, you are Commander and Chief, you have 130,000 men in Iraq, what do you do? Don't give me platitudes, give me a plan, or stop bad mouthing the generals.

Bring them home and quit trying to enforce the imaginary lines drawn on maps of the Middle East by European colonial powers before the last world war.

36 posted on 05/29/2006 10:36:41 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Consider the following figures, displayed here for your exclusive reading pleasure.

Nice, but entirely irrelevant to the 20,000 Americans who have been wounded or killed in the last three years of war.

37 posted on 05/29/2006 10:38:12 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF
The MSM had no problem reporting Army deaths in Somalia when clinton was in power.

If you remember that story completely, the Klinton administration set up the Somalia event as if it were a made for tv movie.

I still remember seeing the bright camera lights on the beach illuminating the marines as they came ashore. The whole thing was treated as a hollywood movie, not real life.

When things went downhill fast, the media has no choice but the report the downing of the Blackhawk.

BUT, if you also remember, they reported it and then let it slip into the background almost immediately. That was because it was a Democratic administration.

Same with Serbia. There were thousands and thousands of civilians killed, but no mention in the media. Remember the missile hitting the passenger train?? The onboard camera recorded the entire thing until hitting the train??

The media let that drop like a hot rock.

No my friend, the coverage is most definitely biased and different when a Republican administration is in power and is done so with a purpose.

38 posted on 05/29/2006 10:38:21 AM PDT by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark
Iraq is a low scale insurgency barreling towards a civil war. It was mismanaged from the start

Thank you for showing your hand. I have you marked, troll.

Now I can utterly ignore you.

39 posted on 05/29/2006 10:39:19 AM PDT by JCEccles (“It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.” Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: silentknight
lready posted

Yah. And thank the mods for leaving this one up. Why can't you thread nannies understand that the life cycle of some threads may be only a couple of hours?

The Mods are very capable of deleting dupe posts that are going on in the same time frame.

40 posted on 05/29/2006 10:39:44 AM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson