Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2006 9:33:09 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...

Fox News Watch/NewsBusters ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 05/28/2006 9:36:41 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I saw it and loved it. Rich Lowry is good. I like when he fills in for Hannity.

Gabler never misses an opportunity to bash Bush. Newswatch is not a debate show. I can't stand him.

3 posted on 05/28/2006 9:37:18 AM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly (Liberals lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Neal Gabler is a non-entity.


5 posted on 05/28/2006 9:39:17 AM PDT by Clara Lou (A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Kneel Gobbler.

That's what I call him.


6 posted on 05/28/2006 9:39:34 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Gosh, I'm sorry I missed that! I've given up on watching "News Watch" because it's just another means for spouting liberal talking points. Kudos to Lowry, and rotten onions to Thomas, who usually allows Gabler (Gobbler?) to rant on--either unchallenged, or just mildly so.


7 posted on 05/28/2006 9:43:39 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Gabler was better off reviewing movies (with Michael Medved, oddly enough). At least there his fantasy life doesn't harm anyone.


8 posted on 05/28/2006 9:44:25 AM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
We need more commentators that put these left leaning wingnuts in their place. Good for him
9 posted on 05/28/2006 9:46:27 AM PDT by 12th_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

bookmkPing ,. ... and thanks


10 posted on 05/28/2006 9:46:50 AM PDT by Dad yer funny (BinScentie Pox , BinLadin , 2 tall enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Gabler is a paid up member of the moonbat DU, Kos AND moveon.org.
He is a crazy as a coot and of no consequence.
12 posted on 05/28/2006 9:53:49 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I wonder what Gabler thinks about Dr. Eastman of the Claremont Institute testifying before the House Intel Committee yesterday and telling them the media can be prosecuted for publishing classified information?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1639577/posts


13 posted on 05/28/2006 9:54:18 AM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
National Review editor Rich Lowry is electable.
Let's draft him!
15 posted on 05/28/2006 10:01:11 AM PDT by BellStar (God makes a promise, faith believes it, hope anticipates it, patience quietly awaits it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I thought the "gentlemen's agreement" was that you don't aim to expose national security secrets in order to damage a war effort, especially not when the stakes are winner take all.


16 posted on 05/28/2006 10:01:29 AM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Two quick comments, probably unrelated, but they should serve as food for thought;

a) Republican democracy cannot exist without a free, independant press. Gabler does have an argument that the White House prosecuting leaks is threat to the premise of a independant press. He errs when he makes the argument that the free and independant press is an end unto itself, and as such, should have no restraints put upon it at all. It's been said before, and apparently needs to be restated, the Constitution (in this case, the First Amendment) is not a suicide pact. The government does not have a right to keep it's operations a secret, per se, but often needs to in order to serve the common good of all.

Gabler, in this regard, is not arguing for the common good of all, but for the good of a select few (i.e. the press).

b) While the free and independant press is a necssary and valuable adjunct to the maintenance of republican democracy, it is not the Alpha and Omega that many within it's ranks believe it is, particularly in a day and age where technology has rendered the old school journalism of newspapers and network nes obsolete. People have more options when it comes to informing (and disinforming) themselves, and this is no longer the private domain of the J-school clique.. Their (the presses) "professional" snobbery very often leads them to believe that only THEY have the right (and ability) to steer public opinion or that only THEY can serve as censors with regards to what is presented to the public and what is not. The press in this country is just as guilty of that which it now accuses an unpopular (to the press) government of being: unprincipled censors who do not have the best interests of the American nation at heart.

It was not so much Lowry putting Gabler in his place as it was Lowry restating what should have been obvious to anyone with the same sense God gave to an Irish Setter (which, I guess, excludes Gabler).


22 posted on 05/28/2006 10:26:10 AM PDT by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Saw it, loved it.


23 posted on 05/28/2006 10:39:52 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I saw that part of the show. It is very difficult to sit through the whole of this show. Pretty bad, beginning with the host. Lowry was certainly an improvement over the pathetic Cal Thomas who even makes Gabler seem likable. Pinkerton is ok much of the time and Jane is liberal but not obnoxious like Cal Thomas and Gabler.


26 posted on 05/28/2006 11:12:20 AM PDT by jubail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I saw it. Personally, I don't think he landed a punch on Gabler. Gabler just rattles on no matter what.


28 posted on 05/28/2006 11:45:43 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

This show would be unwatchable without TiVo. . . we
skip Gabler. Pinkerton is still a favorite but I find the host more and more in love with himself. . . I don't don't think he's as amusing as he thinks himself!
Lowry seems to be growing less shy. He's always been brilliant and his writing is excellent but he used to appear very quiet. No more and good for him!


32 posted on 05/28/2006 12:03:06 PM PDT by SouthCarolinaKit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Lowry is one of the few on Fox News who is booked to offer a conservative point of view and does. I wish he would replace both Barnes and Kristol.


33 posted on 05/28/2006 12:06:22 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

Rich Lowry ping


41 posted on 05/29/2006 10:24:33 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; phantomworker; ajolympian2004; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

42 posted on 05/29/2006 10:26:46 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson