Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hard lessons as S.F. public education feels squeeze
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 5/27/6 | Nanette Asimov and Heather Knight

Posted on 05/27/2006 8:15:57 PM PDT by SmithL

This should be a good time for San Francisco's public schools.

Test scores are rising, the district has earned national praise, and voters have approved a measure that will add millions of dollars to the school budget each year.

Instead, the schools are at a crisis point, and the main cause is beyond their control: High housing prices are spurring many families to leave the city.

As a result, enrollment is declining, schools are closing and officials are concerned the turmoil will reinforce negative perceptions that have helped give San Francisco the state's highest percentage of children in private schools, 29 percent.

The decline is happening, in fact, despite a population boom among preschool children. Once children reach school age, many families move, according to census data and city surveys.

"If you're going to have to make a lot of sacrifices to live in the city, the quality of the schools becomes all that much more important," said Margaret Brodkin, head of the city Department of Children, Youth and Their Families. "It becomes a factor that can draw you to stay -- but also then becomes a factor that forces you to leave."

Supporters of the public schools say things appear to be on the right track: Test scores improve every year, and parents are able to choose from a wider variety of campuses than in the past.

But the leadership and future of the district remain unclear.

The midyear departure of Superintendent Arlene Ackerman, who led the district for six years, calmed an acrimonious atmosphere that had come to characterize the district.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bluezone; childshortage; cities; dontwantmykid2bgay; education; nofamsinlibsf; publicschools; sanfrancisco; sf

1 posted on 05/27/2006 8:16:00 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: BLCA

The high housing costs are the primary factor, I think. Money talks louder than mores, I fear.


3 posted on 05/27/2006 8:24:53 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: BLCA
Could it be that Mommy and daddy don't want their offspring watching two men have sex in public restrooms?

LOL! I bet that's a good part of the real reason people are leaving.

Good for them. I, as a resident of La., will be 'voting with my feet' when I leave this corrupt, God forsaken cesspool.

5 posted on 05/27/2006 8:26:53 PM PDT by CrawDaddyCA (Free Travis McGee!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BLCA


"As a result, enrollment is declining, schools are closing and officials are concerned the turmoil will reinforce negative perceptions that have helped give San Francisco the state's highest percentage of children in private schools, 29 percent."

Aren't these the same people who are opposed to vouchers? I guess the crappy schools are okay for your kids, but not ours....


6 posted on 05/27/2006 8:26:53 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Problem:
(The city schools spend $8,126 per student each year. But much of that money doesn't directly benefit students. Instead, district employees enjoy lucrative benefits -- including health care coverage for life.)

Yet, they decry the "Strings":
(Much of the money coming in from the state and federal government...has strings attached. District officials must use it for specific programs and cannot use it to pay for salaries and benefits.)

As long as the union is there they will never be able to save the schools. It's like a bottomless pit. Just ask GM!


7 posted on 05/27/2006 8:30:51 PM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
"As a result, enrollment is declining, schools are closing and officials are concerned the turmoil will reinforce negative perceptions that have helped give San Francisco the state's highest percentage of children in private schools, 29 percent."

Aren't these the same people who are opposed to vouchers? I guess the crappy schools are okay for your kids, but not ours....

Liberalism at its finest: they know what's best for the Little People, will spend OUR money to make sure it gets done (not their money), and then of course the solution or program is not good enough for them.

8 posted on 05/27/2006 9:37:12 PM PDT by American in Singapore (Bill Clinton: The Human Stain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

For those that say "aren't parents offended about the morals in Frisco?"...unfortunately, no, most could care less. It's just housing prices. The bad news is that liberals are migrating elsewhere now :P


9 posted on 05/27/2006 9:47:23 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

Same story in Seattle and Portland. It's not just housing prices. At least not in Portland. A lot of the surrounding areas are more expensive. But the Portland School District and city are not family friendly. The "no cars" mentality is cool if your a twenty something slacker is not so much fun if you have two toddlers to take care of. The high density housing now the required replacement for the stately older homes is not so great if you want kids to have a place to play. There was an article about Seattle schools losing kids last week. I'll see if I can find it.


10 posted on 05/27/2006 10:14:56 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Same story in Seattle and Portland:

Dramatic changes proposed for Seattle schools ( Losing Students in a Blue City )

Same story in L.A.:

CA: The Incredible Shrinking School District - (LAUSD) More taxes for to pay for empty schoolrooms?

11 posted on 05/27/2006 10:27:42 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If Key West had a school system of any size or Greenwich Village was a separate city, the same would be happening there as well. This is what happens when a whole city of queers with two earning partners runs a town.


12 posted on 05/28/2006 6:35:55 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer: Fighting to save America from Hillary Clinton..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
There was an article recently stating that in NY, Chicago,LA,Houston and Philadelphia white enrollment in the public schools is less than 15% in all cases and in some is closer to 10% of total students. I notice in SF it is less than 10%. My guess is that it will continue to drop. I assume the reason the SF public schools do better than other cities in CA. is the high proportion of Asians in the SF schools.Interesting.
13 posted on 05/28/2006 10:57:18 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson