Another example of government funded homosexual activist wishful thinking.
1 posted on
05/26/2006 12:40:47 PM PDT by
DBeers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: DBeers
"We've done a study of 1,000 gay brothers and found that brothers who are gay tend to be gay and have gay brothers as well"
2 posted on
05/26/2006 12:42:47 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: DBeers
Can gay incestuous twins get married in Massachussetts?
3 posted on
05/26/2006 12:44:14 PM PDT by
Vicomte13
(Aure entuluva!)
To: DBeers
Maybe the gene that contributes to sexual orientation does something else as well."it would take at least 6 months to post all the one-liners for this crap
4 posted on
05/26/2006 12:45:13 PM PDT by
kingattax
To: DBeers
"Folks don't like this kind of research, that shows that sexual orientation is genetically based," he says. "It undermines the argument that it is a choice."*****************
It doesn't undermine the fact that there is a choice, however. Homosexuals can still choose to be celibate.
5 posted on
05/26/2006 12:46:11 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: DBeers
Researchers are attempting to discover a genetic linkage to sexual orientation by studying one thousand pairs of gay brothers. This five-year study being conducted by researchers from Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Research Institute, Northwestern University and the University of Chicago will be the largest study of this kind and is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. It doesn't matter if it is one pair or a thousand. The researchers will conclude only what they want to conclude.
6 posted on
05/26/2006 12:47:27 PM PDT by
SaveTheChief
("This one goes to eleven.")
To: DBeers
Maybe the gene that contributes to sexual orientation does something else as well." It's also responsible for lisps, zig zag finger snaps and head bobs.
7 posted on
05/26/2006 12:47:43 PM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; Annie03; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!
If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!
To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.
Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
If they find a genetic link for sexual orientation, then the argument goes, you don't blame people because they have blue eyes, why would you blame them for their sexual orientation? This kind of research undermines the choice argument and that bothers some groups who are out to prove that sexual orientation is something one chooses.
Just recovering from lesbian brain theory -and now this on the horizon?
It is but more severely flawed research with only ambiguous results possible coming our way eventually to be AP headlined as definitive.
Only those subjectively driving an agenda and not objective scientists rush in like this putting the cart before the horse. Before one can objectively link anything to "orientation" one must first objectively be able to identify orientation...
9 posted on
05/26/2006 12:50:04 PM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
To: DBeers
My question is how do they separate the nature from the nurture in this scenario. Two brothers may have the same genetice code, but they also share the same environmental forces that might steer them towards homosexuality.
To: DBeers
IOW they are already assuming the end result and thus have tained the study.
This is bogus even before it starts. It must be in anticipation of another round of homosexual based marriage votes.
Next we have the FR gene.
15 posted on
05/26/2006 1:00:25 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: DBeers
Entire Department of Health and Human Services could be scrapped as far as I am concerned.
17 posted on
05/26/2006 1:00:59 PM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: GSWarrior
Did you say brothas?
To: DBeers
Good God! Taxpayers money at work?
To: DBeers
Scientists want to get into gay brothers genes?........
21 posted on
05/26/2006 1:03:34 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
To: DBeers
While they're at it, they need to do a new study of Gay Siamese twins. The Ben Dover Institute conducted one many years ago. It was funded by Doublemint Gum.
24 posted on
05/26/2006 1:05:21 PM PDT by
Free ThinkerNY
((((Truth to a Liberal, is like a crucifix to a vampire))))
To: DBeers
Hmm, then is this is based on genetic makeup why not include the father? Or the mother for that matter and see if she has the hots for the same sex?
Or, better yet, just study the entire family and calculate if more than one family member enjoys ingesting feces.
26 posted on
05/26/2006 1:07:17 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(What is is about "illegal" you don't understand?)
To: DBeers
Researchers are attempting to discover a genetic linkage to sexual orientation by studying one thousand pairs of gay brothers.I notice they aren't talking about the sets of twins where one is a homosexual and the other isn't. Can you say 'agenda driven study'?
27 posted on
05/26/2006 1:07:50 PM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: DBeers
"Folks don't like this kind of research, that shows that sexual orientation is genetically based," he says. "It undermines the argument that it is a choice."
What's next, the great search for the "adultery gene"?
"See, Honey? I couldn't help myself! It's hereditary!"
28 posted on
05/26/2006 1:09:54 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Ginty for US Senate -- NJ's primary day is June 6 -- www.gintyforsenate.org)
To: DBeers
We couldn't prove the results we wanted so we need more people to get the results we still won't get?
30 posted on
05/26/2006 1:11:07 PM PDT by
Jaded
(does it really need a sarcasm tag?)
To: DBeers
Wouldn't they be better served to find brothers where one is happy and the other is not ?
34 posted on
05/26/2006 1:16:33 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't)
To: DBeers
Unless they're trying to find a way to 'repair' this gene, I don't see the point.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson