Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The metric system. The French gift to mankind.
1 posted on 05/25/2006 6:51:12 PM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: captain_dave

The metric system is apparently too nuanced for this author.


2 posted on 05/25/2006 6:57:14 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

Base ten numeral systems at least make sense historically. Count your fingers to see why we count in base ten.


3 posted on 05/25/2006 6:57:31 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

Here in New Zealand the under 40 knows hardly anything about the "old" imperial measurement units. Ask him how many feet is and he will draw a blank stare. In Australia it is illegal not to use metric units LOL.

But considering as a separate issue, I don't think using fractions for a metric unit is such as big deal. People will always use "half a litre", or "one and a half metres".


4 posted on 05/25/2006 6:58:05 PM PDT by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
you wouldn't be ABLE to generate a precise system on base ten, because you'd have to estimate where to put the markings on the ruler!

Gee. We figured out the answer to that one in junior high. ("Middle school" to you youngsters.)

Simple geometry, if you have decent teachers.

(Not that we've had many decent teachers for a long time -- a good many are nothing but union workers.)

5 posted on 05/25/2006 7:00:41 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0urs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
If this idiot is incapable of navigating between measuring systems, then the problem isn't SI or Imperial measurements, it's her dumb ass!!!

I was born in SI land, came to Imperial land, and I can easily switch between systems. It takes practice, but I was able to do it. When I see temperatures, lengths, weights I always make the exercise of converting to the other system. If I see a temperature in Fahrenheit, I always make the mental conversion to Celsius.

The world is split, but not for me.
7 posted on 05/25/2006 7:09:45 PM PDT by El Conservador ("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

When I went to school I was taught that 16 oz was a pint and two pints equaled a quart. I was also taught that a liter was a little larger (1.8 oz) than a quart. Thus I conclude that a half liter is 500 ml rather than 250 ml as described in this article.


9 posted on 05/25/2006 7:11:20 PM PDT by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

The Metric System: Proof that what comes from Europe, is stupid!


10 posted on 05/25/2006 7:14:18 PM PDT by Bommer (Attention illegals: Why don't you do the jobs we can't do? Like fix your own countries problems!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

A rectangular plot of land is 6 2/3 furlongs wide and 512 rods long. How many such areas would it take to equal the area of 15 square nautical miles?

Ah, the English system!


11 posted on 05/25/2006 7:16:16 PM PDT by Semi Civil Servant (Colorado: the original Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

The metric system was a communist plot to overthrow the west. It partially succeeded.


13 posted on 05/25/2006 7:19:16 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
The metric system. The French gift to mankind.

Even a stopped clock is right once (or twice, depending upon the clock) a day.

I grew up with inches, pounds, quarts and all the rest... though I didn't grow up with farthings, ha-pennies, thruppence, groats, sixpence ("bang goes saxpence!" -an old Scots saying), shillings, florins, half a crown, corwn, nobel (sp?), half-sovereign, sovereign, and giunea (sp?)...

Gimme a decimal-based system. And all else as well. If we have to create Latin-based shortcuts such as "quarter" (one-fourth), we'll do it.

But measurements like "furlong per fortnight" or "firkins per florin".. when you're trying to scale to a common base such as "miles(kilometers) per hour" for comparison, are just a headache. A question such as "How many ounces in a gallon?" is a piece of cake in a decimal system. But tell me this: "How many groats in a sovereign"? (If you're a Brit I'm sure you can me in a flash, but I will follow up: "How many crowns are 1.3 bob?")

15 posted on 05/25/2006 7:24:01 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0urs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
>"The metric system. The French gift to mankind.">

And they still got it wrong! Isn't the whole meter measurement based upon WRONG numbers? So what if it's divisible by ten? It's crap to begin with!

If they want to impose standard units of mesurements upon mankind the least they should do is do it correctly! Confederacy of Dunces!!!

16 posted on 05/25/2006 7:27:09 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather be carrying a shotgun with Dick, than riding shotgun with a Kennedyl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
When the Space Shuttle was used to rescue and repair the Hubble Telescope, the mission was saved by using Standard Measurements.

The astronaut was strapped to the top of the shuttle and was instructed by mission control on how to grab the telescope so it could be brought into the service bay.

They did not play metric games by saying a decimeter to the left or 5 centimeters to the right.

They saved the Hubble Telescope by giving clear instructions in inches.

Inches saved the Hubble Telescope.

17 posted on 05/25/2006 7:28:23 PM PDT by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

If the metric system catches on in this country, football will become 30.5 centimeter ball.


21 posted on 05/25/2006 7:52:37 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

I think in both systems. It is not hard.

I even think in furlongs.


22 posted on 05/25/2006 7:53:33 PM PDT by RSteyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

Every now and then I read something that makes me wish I had written it; boy, is this ever one of those times.

We live in a circular world and pretend to think in a linear fashion.


24 posted on 05/25/2006 8:17:21 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
Celsius has nothing to do with the French Revolution--the Swede Anders Celsius invented his system in 1742 and died in 1744, before Robespierre or Marie Antoinette were even born.

I believe the original idea was that one kilometer was 1/10,000 of the distance from the equator to the North Pole. Why a measurement taken on earth (and very hard to do accurately) should be the norm for the universe escapes me.

26 posted on 05/25/2006 8:23:49 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

Fahrenheit measurements are highly intuitive for weather because they cover the vast bulk of experience in temperate climates. Here in Pennsylvania, we rarely get below zero (setting aside "wind chill") nor rarely above a hundred. Everyone immediately knows what the thirties or the eighties or the fifties feel like.

All of that experiential knowledge is lost when the range tops out at about 40, but veers into the negative in winter. Feh.


27 posted on 05/25/2006 8:26:32 PM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
The metric system. The French gift to mankind.

That's probably the biggest reason it's still not universal

33 posted on 05/25/2006 8:54:19 PM PDT by Professional Engineer (USA, USA, USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
What is the one physical unit which is still defined by an artifact? Answer later.

There was actually a metric system of time. The day was divided into decidays (like hours), the decidays into centi- and millidays. One milliday equals 86.4 seconds. And it rolls off the tongue so much more easily than that awkward construction, "minute". Instead of a second, one could just say "ten microdays".

Their calendar was a hoot. Months were all thirty days long, with five or six intercalary ("leap") days, the exact number determined by some funny rules. The intercalary days were holidays, when bureaucrats and intellectuals wouldn't have to show up for work, only servants and bakers needed to work these days.

For some odd reason, metric time never caught on, big time.

Measurements of angles are a different thing. Artillerist already use the circular mill, a metric division which makes sense where one needs to make rapid incremental adjustments in the field without bothering with conversions across degrees, minutes and seconds. The radian is a natural unit but most people are not comfortable with irrational (or worse: transcendental) numbers, there being two pi radians in a circle. The Babylonians used 360 degrees because they noticed that the sun moves about one degree across the ecliptic in a day, and being reasonable people realized that 360 was a lot easier to deal with than 365.2421.... It's interesting that a lot of modern astronomical tables use units of arcseconds, or fractions thereof. For instance, the apparent diameter of the moon or sun might be specified as 1773.54 arcseconds, rather than a fraction of a degree or minutes and seconds of arc.

When I visited the Royal Greenwich Observatory Museum, they had a famous eighteenth century transit circle still mounted on its original brick wall. The "circle" was actually about 120 degrees of arc, total. It consisted of a large brass circular arc about 25 feet (8.3333 yards for metric fans) across about 3/8" (~one centimeter) thick and maybe six inches ( a centiday?) wide. The inner circumference had been scribed in binary units, repeated division of the original arc into halves. The outer circumference was divided into degrees and seconds by interpolating between the binary measurements. Major divisions, the degrees and tens of arcminutes had slightly longer tick marks and numbers stamped on them.

Aeronautical navigation worldwide is still done in nautical miles and feet of altitude. Conversion to metric would not only cost millions and millions of dollars but also claim hundreds of lives. (Google Gimli Glider for a foretaste.)

The kilogram is defined by the standard kilogram, kept in a vault at BIPM headquarters in Paris.

41 posted on 05/26/2006 5:35:45 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave
The metric system. The French gift to mankind.

*shrug* I like the metric system.

Even the french can't be wrong all the time...

43 posted on 05/26/2006 6:24:47 AM PDT by null and void (Islam wasn't hijacked on 9/11. It was exposed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson