Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate set for immigration vote today - Update: Bill Passed 62-36
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/25/06 | David Espo - ap

Posted on 05/25/2006 2:46:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - Legislation offering millions of illegal immigrants a chance at U.S. citizenship moved to the brink of Senate passage Thursday, a rare reach across party lines and a triumph for President Bush.

Majority Leader Bill Frist called for swift talks with the House, which has passed its own version, in what loomed as an arduous search for compromise.

Underscoring bipartisan support in the Senate, Frist, R-Tenn., and Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada announced in advance they would support the measure. It was months in the drafting and narrowly survived several brushes with disaster across more than a week of debate.

The legislation calls for stronger border security, a new guest worker program and — most controversially — provisions giving many of the illegal immigrants in the country an eventual chance to become citizens. Another provision would establish a new system to verify the legal status of workers, and punish employers who knowingly hire illegal laborers.

Conservatives attacked the bill to the end after trying unsuccessfully to pick it apart with amendments.

"This bill will not secure our borders," said Sen. Jeff Sessions (news, bio, voting record), R-Ala., one of the most persistent critics.

"This is amnesty," said Sen. David Vitter, R-La., who tried last week to strip out provisions relating to citizenship.

Together, Sessions and Vitter echoed the views of numerous House Republicans, many of whom have vigorously denounced the Senate bill as well as Bush's call for a "comprehensive approach" to the issue.

That portended difficult compromise talks in the shadow of midterm elections, at a time when Bush's poll ratings are low, congressional Republicans are concerned and Democrats are increasingly optimistic about their chances at the polls.

For now, supporters of the Senate bill said they intended to savor their victory. Peppered with questions about the compromise talks ahead, Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., said, "I'm going to celebrate here."

The House bill, which passed on a largely party-line vote last year, is generally limited to border enforcement. It would make all illegal immigrants subject to felony charges and it contains no provision for either a new temporary worker program or citizenship for men, women and children in the country unlawfully.

Frist said compromise talks should begin swiftly.

"I think it is important on this issue with millions of people coming across our borders illegally, not knowing who they are, where they are going or why they are coming," he said.

In contrast to the House measure, the Senate bill would mark the most far-reaching changes in immigration law in two decades. Built on compromise after painstaking compromise, it was designed to appeal to conservatives and others seeking tougher border enforcement; business interests eager for a steady supply of legal, low-wage labor; unions seeking enhanced protections for migrants who often toil in seasonal work the fields and Hispanics who are on the cusp of greater political power and determined to win a change in legal status for millions of illegal immigrants.

That last group — Hispanics — comprises the fastest growing segment of the electorate, and millions made their feelings clear in street demonstrations denouncing the House measure and calling for passage of a broader measure.

Bush played a prominent role in the run-up to passage. An Oval Office speech last week made explicit his support for the Senate's overall approach. A later trip to Arizona was designed to reassure conservatives about his commitment to stanching illegal immigration.

In more than a week of debate, the Senate made a series of changes in the legislation. Still, the key pillars were preserved when opponents failed to knock out the guest worker program or the citizenship provisions. A new program for 1.5 million temporary agricultural workers also survived.

To secure the borders, the measure calls for the hiring of an additional 1,000 new Border Patrol agents this year and 14,000 by 2011, and backs Bush's plan for a short-term deployment of National Guard troops to states along the Mexican Border. The bill calls for new surveillance equipment as well as the construction of 370 miles of triple-layered fencing and 500 miles of vehicle barriers.

The new guest worker program would admit 200,000 individuals a year. Once here, they would be permitted for the first time to petition on their own for a green card that confers legal permanent residency, a provision designed to reduce the potential for exploitation by employers.

A separate new program, a compromise between growers and unions, envisions admission of an estimated 1.5 million immigrant farm workers who may also apply for permanent residency

Even supporters of the bill conceded the three-tiered program related to illegal immigrants was complicated.

Those in the country unlawfully for five years or more would be permitted to remain, continue working and eventually apply for citizenship. They would be required to pay at least $3,250 in fines and fees, settle any back taxes and learn English.

Illegal immigrants in the country for more than two years but less than five would be required to travel to a point of entry before re-entering the United States legally and beginning a lengthy process of seeking citizenship. They would be subject to the same fines, fees and other requirements as the longer-term immigrants.

An immigrant in the country illegally for less than two years would be required to leave with no guarantee of return.

A new electronic system for employee verification is designed to hold employers accountable for hiring decisions. It provides for maximum fines of $20,000 for each worker and possible jail time for repeat offenders.

A separate controversy erupted over a call to make English the national language. Supporters said it would leave all current rights in place. Detractors argued it could undermine an executive order that mandates assistance to individuals who receive services such as health care yet lack proficiency in English.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; bushbash; sellout; senate; today; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-357 next last
To: He'sComingBack!
Don't beat yourself up and welcome to the light!

Its more than the amnesty bill. The People (remember them?) are overwhelmingly against this. Yet they voted for it anyway. Ill bet Fox is having a great time on his listening tour. Scratch that-his gloating tour..

141 posted on 05/25/2006 4:12:00 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mcarthy in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: All
Freepers....CALL TO ACTION!

For your childrens' sakes and your own, start bombarding your congresspeople tomorrow no matter how you think they are going to vote.

Even if you've never done this in your life, do it now. Take a half hour and just do it.....by phone, fax, or email.

In the email, show your rage in the title slot.

Freepers, this is our test. This is our reason for being here. This is where the rubber meets the road.

I'm phoning Martinez and Bill Nelson tomorrow. I'm going to show my rage. Forget the politeness this time. Be full of rage, but no name-calling or bad words. Righteous rage is what we HAVE to show.

Do the math. If 20 million illegals (a low number) choose to have their spouses and multiple children join them, I don't even want to publish the numerical figure of breathing humans that will descend upon us.

Then there's the subsequent immigration of parents, grandparents, sibling, aunts and uncles, cousins, etc.

Then there's the anchor babies phenomenom.

They will soon take the country over.

Do your bit tomorrow. Keep trying to get through. We're not getting a second chance if the House buckles.

Leni

142 posted on 05/25/2006 4:12:58 PM PDT by MinuteGal (FReeps Ahoy 4 cruisers are home! Check the cruise thread for photos. Hit red "4" on Home Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Sorry, no spin intended.

I agree with you: it is indeed a betrayal.

I do believe, however, that it will be easier for the House to stand firm on "Enforcement first, Enforcement only, Enforcement Now" knowing that the majority of Republican Senators voted against the bill.


143 posted on 05/25/2006 4:13:00 PM PDT by redfog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: steveegg

I already answered your question


144 posted on 05/25/2006 4:13:19 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

Chaffee, DeWine, Lugar and Snowe are up for re-election this November. It will be interesting to see what type of impact will be made as a result of this vote.


145 posted on 05/25/2006 4:14:17 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If Bush signs the Senate version of this garbage, I'm going to bury my American flag. America will be gone folks.


146 posted on 05/25/2006 4:14:21 PM PDT by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

Figures the RepubicRAT Senate "leader" would stack his side of the committee with the most-lieberal of his House of Congress.


147 posted on 05/25/2006 4:14:53 PM PDT by steveegg (If the illegals would turn Mexico Red if they were forced there, why wouldn't they do that here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: deport

OOOOOOK, now we have a list of those states who are willing to accept illegal immigrants. Those who have both senators who voted YEA. All we have to do is make sure that the illegals know where they are most welcome and the problem is solved.


148 posted on 05/25/2006 4:15:35 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

RIGHT, MCCAIN pushed this with KENNEDY.


149 posted on 05/25/2006 4:16:03 PM PDT by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Screw Bill Frist and the entire "Republican" leadership who did this to our country.


150 posted on 05/25/2006 4:16:48 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

So he'll skip straight to the end of the United States of America that the Senate bill represents rather than the 3/4ths-of-the-way-there that he pushed for?


151 posted on 05/25/2006 4:16:55 PM PDT by steveegg (If the illegals would turn Mexico Red if they were forced there, why wouldn't they do that here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Bump


152 posted on 05/25/2006 4:17:30 PM PDT by MinuteGal (FReeps Ahoy 4 cruisers are home! Check the cruise thread for photos. Hit red "4" on Home Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

There were 23.... You left out Hagel


153 posted on 05/25/2006 4:17:44 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Paige
I don't expect Kennedy to follow what conservatives voted for and wanted

Kennedy is a liberal and I'm not surprised by his actions

154 posted on 05/25/2006 4:17:53 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
.. and for other purposes. ???

Bringing on the "New World Order"?

155 posted on 05/25/2006 4:18:05 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Memo to GOP: Don't ask me for any more money until you secure our Southern border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
No .. what I said was he will wait to see what comes out of conference

This stupid Senate Bill is not law and hopefully the House will kill alot of things in it

156 posted on 05/25/2006 4:19:35 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: WayneM

I believe the chairman of the House committee that the bill first came out of, who in this case would be Sensenbrenner, picks the conferees but the Speaker (Hastert) has the overall say.

Anyway, I believe the House cannot appoint their own conferees until the Senate's version of the bill passes -- because, obviously, if the Senate's version of a bill is rejected in the Senate, then there would be nothing to have a joint conference on.

The joint conference is to merge both the Senate bill and the House bill.

All we, or at least I, can hope for is that the House conferees will kill the Senate's sham bill.


157 posted on 05/25/2006 4:20:35 PM PDT by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Cornyn was one of the MAIN Senators in charge of the Immigration policy!!

HE doesn't get on the list???, but DEWENIE does???

Did I see Graham as well???

Boy, Frist sure is stacking the deck isn't he??

At least Sessions and Kyl are there...but that is only 2.

I am not going to even HOPE that the rest that he chooses MIGHT include someone that actually voted against this crap bill.


158 posted on 05/25/2006 4:20:39 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
Regarding the view that the bill will not pass the House, Bush today impounded the documentation obtained by the FBI from Congressman Jefferson's office. Hastert seems awfully strident in trying to get them back and not establishing a precedent of the Executive Branch executing a search warrant on a House of Representatives office. Could it be that Bush would let it be known indirectly that if he were to get an acceptable Immigration Reform bill, that the search warrant issue would be worked out acceptably for Hastert?? Sounds pparanoid, but Bush seems to want this bill more than almost anything else.
159 posted on 05/25/2006 4:21:24 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: dmanLA

If Bush signs the Senate version of this garbage, I'm going to bury my American flag. America will be gone folks.



The two bills will have to go to a conference committee to be reconciled. Neither version will stand alone without changes, or else there will be no bill. So keep your flag...


160 posted on 05/25/2006 4:21:33 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson