Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Flipping Point (global warming conversion of skeptic Michael Shermer)
Scientific American ^ | June 2006 | Michael Shermer

Posted on 05/25/2006 9:02:16 AM PDT by cogitator

The Flipping Point

How the evidence for anthropogenic global warming has converged to cause this environmental skeptic to make a cognitive flip

By Michael Shermer

In 2001 Cambridge University Press published Bjørn Lomborg's book The Skeptical Environmentalist, which I thought was a perfect debate topic for the Skeptics Society public lecture series at the California Institute of Technology. The problem was that all the top environmental organizations refused to participate. "There is no debate," one spokesperson told me. "We don't want to dignify that book," another said. One leading environmentalist warned me that my reputation would be irreparably harmed if I went through with it. So of course I did.

My experience is symptomatic of deep problems that have long plagued the environmental movement. Activists who vandalize Hummer dealerships and destroy logging equipment are criminal ecoterrorists. Environmental groups who cry doom and gloom to keep donations flowing only hurt their credibility. As an undergraduate in the 1970s, I learned (and believed) that by the 1990s overpopulation would lead to worldwide starvation and the exhaustion of key minerals, metals and oil, predictions that failed utterly. Politics polluted the science and made me an environmental skeptic.

Nevertheless, data trump politics, and a convergence of evidence from numerous sources has led me to make a cognitive switch on the subject of anthropogenic global warming. My attention was piqued on February 8 when 86 leading evangelical Christians--the last cohort I expected to get on the environmental bandwagon--issued the Evangelical Climate Initiative calling for "national legislation requiring sufficient economy-wide reductions" in carbon emissions.

Then I attended the TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) conference in Monterey, Calif., where former vice president Al Gore delivered the single finest summation of the evidence for global warming I have ever heard, based on the recent documentary film about his work in this area, An Inconvenient Truth. The striking before-and-after photographs showing the disappearance of glaciers around the world shocked me out of my doubting stance.

Four books eventually brought me to the flipping point. Archaeologist Brian Fagan's The Long Summer (Basic, 2004) explicates how civilization is the gift of a temporary period of mild climate. Geographer Jared Diamond's Collapse (Penguin Group, 2005) demonstrates how natural and human-caused environmental catastrophes led to the collapse of civilizations. Journalist Elizabeth Kolbert's Field Notes from a Catastrophe (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2006) is a page-turning account of her journeys around the world with environmental scientists who are documenting species extinction and climate change unmistakably linked to human action. And biologist Tim Flannery's The Weather Makers (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006) reveals how he went from being a skeptical environmentalist to a believing activist as incontrovertible data linking the increase of carbon dioxide to global warming accumulated in the past decade.

It is a matter of the Goldilocks phenomenon. In the last ice age, CO2 levels were 180 parts per million (ppm)--too cold. Between the agricultural revolution and the industrial revolution, levels rose to 280 ppm--just right. Today levels are at 380 ppm and are projected to reach 450 to 550 by the end of the century--too warm. Like a kettle of water that transforms from liquid to steam when it changes from 99 to 100 degrees Celsius, the environment itself is about to make a CO2-driven flip.

According to Flannery, even if we reduce our carbon dioxide emissions by 70 percent by 2050, average global temperatures will increase between two and nine degrees by 2100. This rise could lead to the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet, which the March 24 issue of Science reports is already shrinking at a rate of 224 ±41 cubic kilometers a year, double the rate measured in 1996 (Los Angeles uses one cubic kilometer of water a year). If it and the West Antarctic Ice Sheet melt, sea levels will rise five to 10 meters, displacing half a billion inhabitants.

Because of the complexity of the problem, environmental skepticism was once tenable. No longer. It is time to flip from skepticism to activism.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: change; climate; co2; emissions; globalwarming; gore; movie; skeptic; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 501-504 next last
To: Paradox
Dealing with nuclear waste is trivial compared to what might have to be dealt with if the advocates are right.

"If the advocates" are right fits into the same category of "if the moon is made of green cheese."

The warming of the past century is a slight warm up from the mini ice age of the last millennium and still far below the 10,000 year average. It also coincides with increased solar activity which had, coincidentally, been at a minimum during the mini ice age. Hmmm, that solar activity has also managed to be coincident with temperature fluctuations for hundreds of thousands of years. There is no meaningful "human" component to global warming.
341 posted on 05/27/2006 8:25:46 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
From my understanding of the Glacier issue, we have only studied a small fraction of the world's glaciers. Of those, about half are receding and half are proceeding. Furthermore, the West AntArtic ice pack is not melting.

Sounds like this guy is only getting half of the info. And it is still political science.
342 posted on 05/27/2006 8:40:35 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Even if all the corn grown in the U.S. were converted into ethanol, it would not even come close to solving our vehicle energy needs. As far as environmentalist predictions are concerned, they have been amazingly and consistently wrong. Mount Pinatubo alone should have wrecked our ecology according to them.


343 posted on 05/27/2006 8:45:53 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
"If the advocates" are right fits into the same category of "if the moon is made of green cheese."

Of course, but this means we can use their fear and trepidation about GW in order to get them into advocating Nuclear energy, which would be a good thing for the US anyways.

344 posted on 05/27/2006 9:38:18 AM PDT by Paradox (Removing all Doubt since 1998!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Re: The same people who believe in global warming also, for the most part, believe that we're soon going to run out of fossil fuels.

Well said. "We're going to exhaust all fossil fuels by 1999, aren't we?"

345 posted on 05/27/2006 9:44:39 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear
The earth is millions

It's 4.6 Billion. It makes your point even more true.

346 posted on 05/27/2006 9:48:58 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Pardon me if I'm somewhat unimpressed by the fact that the declaration of a bunch of evangelical preachers (I am one, BTW, also a former research chemist), was a major factor in his flip.

I am also unimpressed by the subtle disappearance of the word "anthropogenic" after its only mention early in the article.

Don't want to be a cynic, but there's lots more $$$ in being a faithful witness to anthropogenic global warming than there is in being a skeptic.

I remain skeptical, and poor.


347 posted on 05/27/2006 9:52:03 AM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

In other words, what he is saying is like a seminar caller, "I used to be a [skeptic, Republican, conservative] but the failure.... blah, blah, blah.


348 posted on 05/27/2006 9:54:47 AM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
A DARPA RFQ I'de like to see:
General Information
Document Type: Presolicitation Notice
Solicitation Number: HR0011-06-Q-0001
Posted Date: Nov 15, 2005
Original Response Date: Jan 03, 2006
Current Response Date: Jan 03, 2006
Original Archive Date: Jan 18, 2006
Current Archive Date: Jan 18, 2006
Classification Code: R -- Professional, administrative, and management support services
Set Aside: Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned 
Naics Code: 541611 -- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Description

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is developing an plan to decrease the temperature in the United States of America. Winner gets 1 Billion dollars. 

Point of Contact

Doug Pollock, Contracting Officer, DARPA Contracts Management Office (CMO), Phone None, Fax (703) 696-2208, Email dpollock@darpa.mil

Place of Performance

Address: Off-site from DARPA 


349 posted on 05/27/2006 9:56:00 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Martians are have the same global warming problem. How do the lefty crisis mongers explain that?


350 posted on 05/27/2006 9:58:18 AM PDT by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #351 Removed by Moderator

To: cogitator
There may be a preponderance of self-referencing studies which have man as the cause, however there have been episodes of warming and cooling in the past which were (obviously) unrelated to human activity.

There is not enough proof that this 'episode' is any more human-related than those were.

For all our species' egomania, we are just along for the ride.

For the global socialists, this is the boogeyman to ride to world domination, if they can.

It is the one excuse to get all nations marching in lockstep, and subjugate them to a world government.

Note, that from a policy standpoint, (Kyoto) the issue is not one of whether or not there is pollution, but one of who is allowed to pollute.

IF the models were valid, they would not only explain this episode of warming but the others as well. They do not.

352 posted on 05/27/2006 10:13:29 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Why?
353 posted on 05/27/2006 10:13:44 AM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
BTW -- Biosphere II is still standing -- and open for tours.

But is still operating as a so-called biosphere? Or, is it just a museum to a failed experiment?

354 posted on 05/27/2006 10:24:47 AM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: hgro
So many people ignore the geologic component in all this.

We live on a "hot" planet. If space is -450.67F (5 degree Kelvin) and the sun is responsible for +33K. of warming of the atmosphere, where does the other 417 degrees come from?

Assuming the crust of the earth is 3.1 miles thick and the Mantle under is 1600 degrees Fahrenheit, how can one ignore a 1600 degree heat source just 3 miles away?

355 posted on 05/27/2006 10:34:08 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
"where does the other 417 degrees come from?

Assuming the crust of the earth is 3.1 miles thick and the Mantle under is 1600 degrees Fahrenheit, how can one ignore a 1600 degree heat source just 3 miles away?


Thank god for global warming. Other wise a typical day in Sothern California would be -337 degrees.

356 posted on 05/27/2006 11:05:11 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

According to the GW theorists/advocates even if their preposterous theories were true, (slight change in size of gnat on ass of atmosphere to destroy life on planent) all we would need to do according to their data and reports, is burn increased amounts of cheap, plentiful high sulfur coal, which they note has the ability to measurably reduce the temperture increases wrought by AGW.


357 posted on 05/27/2006 12:50:26 PM PDT by Gail Wynand (Why not "virtual citizenship"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito
Pardon me if I'm somewhat unimpressed by the fact that the declaration of a bunch of evangelical preachers (I am one, BTW, also a former research chemist), was a major factor in his flip.

Evangelical preachers are always the last to adopt whatever weird crap has been in the popular culture. And they do it about 30 years late. Francis Schaeffer noted this years ago in The God Who Is There.
358 posted on 05/27/2006 1:30:38 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: elvisabel78

The land-based temperature records are an artifact caused by urban heat islands.


359 posted on 05/27/2006 1:34:43 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Environmental groups who cry doom and gloom to keep donations flowing only hurt their credibility. As an undergraduate in the 1970s, I learned (and believed) that by the 1990s overpopulation would lead to worldwide starvation and the exhaustion of key minerals, metals and oil, predictions that failed utterly. ...

Because of the complexity of the problem, environmental skepticism was once tenable. No longer. It is time to flip from skepticism to activism.

I am underwhelmed by the evidence provided. You just been fooled again.

360 posted on 05/27/2006 1:45:51 PM PDT by ChessExpert (MSM: America's one party press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 501-504 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson