Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marijuana Does Not Raise Lung Cancer Risk / Mary Jane Trumps Joe Camel
Fox News / Science Now ^

Posted on 05/24/2006 10:40:07 AM PDT by Sir Gawain

Mary Jane Trumps Joe Camel

By Mary Beckman
ScienceNOW Daily News
23 May 2006

It seems logical that inhaling enough smoke will give you lung cancer. But a new study of Los Angeles residents suggests that smoking marijuana--even more than 22,000 joints in a lifetime--doesn't increase cancer risk. The results surprise many researchers, who point out marijuana has other ill health effects.

Decades of research have shown that cigarette smoking dramatically increases the risk of certain cancers. But controversy surrounds the risk of smoking weed. A 1999 study of blood donors suggested a link between marijuana and head and neck cancer, but a larger study in 2004 found no such connection. Still, work in the lab suggests marijuana can be dangerous. For example, pot smoke contains more of some cancer-causing chemicals than cigarettes do, thanks to the filterless nature of joints.

In hopes of settling the debate, pulmonologist Donald Tashkin of the University of California, Los Angeles, and colleagues assembled the largest study to date. They identified cancer patients through the University of Southern California Tumor Registry, which compiles cancer data in Los Angeles County. From 1999 to 2003, 611 Los Angelinos age 60 and under came down with lung cancer, and 601 developed head and neck cancers, each a kind of malignancy that smokers would most likely suffer from. The team then identified more than 1000 control individuals in L.A. who did not have cancer. The researchers matched these individuals to cancer patients by age, gender, and other factors such as the neighborhood in which they lived. In confidential interviews, Tashkin's group determined marijuana usage as well as other risk factors for cancer such as cigarette smoking.

Statistical analysis revealed that smoking joints did not increase the risk of coming down with these cancers. About half of cancer patients and controls smoked marijuana, but more than 80% of cancer patients were current or former cigarette smokers. Even heavy tokers--who reported smoking a total of about 22,000 joints over their lifetime--did not have increased risk compared to nonsmokers. The researchers will present their findings tomorrow at the American Thoracic Society International Conference in San Diego.

The results surprised Tashkin. "I wouldn't give [marijuana] a clean bill of health, but at least this study says if there is a risk, it's very small," he says. Still, he says, marijuana has been shown to suppress the immune system and may increase the risk of pneumonia.

As for why marijuana use doesn't seem to increase cancer risk, pulmonary critical care researcher John Hansen-Flaschen of the University of Pennsylvania points out that cigarette smokers puff a lot more cigarettes than do marijuana users--a smoker with a 2-pack-a-day habit lights up 292,000 cigarettes over 20 years, for example. That's probably because marijuana isn't nearly as addictive as tobacco, says epidemiologist Steve Schwartz of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, who conducted the 2004 study.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bigfatties; bogartin; dopers; fox; foxnews; heads; lawenforcement; leo; mrleroybait; reefermadness; rickywilliams; stoners; wastoids; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Here's the related Fox News story:

Marijuana Does Not Raise Lung Cancer Risk

1 posted on 05/24/2006 10:40:10 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; Wolfie; TKDietz

Let's get off the immigration for a bit and get back to a good old drug war thread! :-D


2 posted on 05/24/2006 10:41:47 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Even heavy tokers--who reported smoking a total of about 22,000 joints over their lifetime

DUDE! That is alot of nachos.

3 posted on 05/24/2006 10:42:11 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Doh!

I'm up to 21,999 joints so far.

4 posted on 05/24/2006 10:44:00 AM PDT by lormand (Michael Savage - The "turd in the punch bowl" of Conservatism. The maniac is a populist in fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
even more than 22,000 joints in a lifetime

Sounds like Tommy Chong may have been a part of this research.

By the way, if you ever meet him in person, you won't hear the doper voice he uses on TV, etc. unless someone talks him into doing the character.

Acting!

5 posted on 05/24/2006 10:48:38 AM PDT by capt. norm (W.C. Fields: "Hollywood is the gold cap on a tooth that should have been pulled out years ago.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Even heavy tokers--who reported smoking a total of about 22,000 joints over their lifetime

"22,000?! Is that all?"


6 posted on 05/24/2006 10:49:29 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

From another article:

Cellular studies and even some studies in animal models suggest that THC has antitumor properties, either by encouraging the death of genetically damaged cells that can become cancerous or by restricting the development of the blood supply that feeds tumors, Tashkin tells WebMD.

In a review of the research published last fall, University of Colorado molecular biologist Robert Melamede, PhD, concluded that the THC in cannabis seems to lessen the tumor-promoting properties of marijuana smoke.

The nicotine in tobacco has been shown to inhibit the destruction of cancer-causing cells, Melamede tells WebMD. THC does not appear to do this and may even do the opposite.


7 posted on 05/24/2006 10:50:09 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Let's get off the immigration for a bit and get back to a good old drug war thread!

To quote Afroman: "I was going to fight in the drug war, but then I got high."

My grand children have been playing that song until I think I have it memorized.

8 posted on 05/24/2006 10:51:56 AM PDT by capt. norm (W.C. Fields: "Hollywood is the gold cap on a tooth that should have been pulled out years ago.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

LOL! That's a lot of trees!

Seriously, are there actually retards who still think marijuana is more dangerous than cigarettes and alcohol?

Just say no to it all. You wanna rush? Jog a mile. It's invigorating... really.


9 posted on 05/24/2006 10:52:39 AM PDT by AmericanRepublican (There are fools on both sides. Only the true Americans will prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

If research showed that smoking marijuana CURED lung cancer, the WODdie freaks would still be hyper-ventilating over the devil weed.

Just my opinion.


10 posted on 05/24/2006 10:53:29 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Yes, I was thinking it might contain some anticancer and anti-inflammatory compounds as well.


11 posted on 05/24/2006 10:54:37 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

"work in the lab suggests marijuana can be dangerous"

Yeah, people high in a lab drop flasks and stuff.


12 posted on 05/24/2006 10:59:08 AM PDT by Leg Olam ("There is no Hell. There is only France." F. Zappa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Now if we could compare the guys who smoke 22,000 joints in a lifetime to those who smoke .8 cigarettes a day, we'd really see the comparative risks!

http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v04n2/04204mwp.html
related article

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/marijuana_dc
related article

"He theorized that tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, a chemical in marijuana smoke that produces its psychotropic effect, may encourage aging, damaged cells to die off before they become cancerous." (It only kills off the weak brain cells...now who said that?)


13 posted on 05/24/2006 10:59:15 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanRepublican
Seriously, are there actually retards who still think marijuana is more dangerous than cigarettes and alcohol?

Apparently the insurance industry does. They require drug screening for construction companies and will not cover a company that hires someone who flunks the test.

14 posted on 05/24/2006 11:00:49 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

"DUDE! That is alot of nachos."

.... and Twinkies.....

.... and cold Pizza.....


15 posted on 05/24/2006 11:02:59 AM PDT by roaddog727 (eludium PU36 explosive space modulator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanRepublican
You wanna rush? Jog a mile. It's invigorating... really.

My first mate on an 85 foot overnight charterboat reinvented the word invigorating. We had one deckhand who overslept thru the first fishing stop.

He was still asleep in his sleeping bag on a bunk when the first mate came in with a live, freshly-caught bonito and stuck it into the sleeping bag with him. Nothing like a 12 pound lively fish in your bed for "invigoration".

Don't know how many of you are familiar with bonito. They are a smaller form of tuna and they are semi-warm blooded. Even after being landed, their entire body continues the swimming motions for quite a while and they make a lot of noise as their tails almost "vibrate" slapping on the deck.

16 posted on 05/24/2006 11:03:34 AM PDT by capt. norm (W.C. Fields: "Hollywood is the gold cap on a tooth that should have been pulled out years ago.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

~~~~~~~



17 posted on 05/24/2006 11:04:30 AM PDT by WallStsk8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
At 4 a week, it would take 84 years --

Carolyn

18 posted on 05/24/2006 11:05:06 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

LOL!

That is just wrong... I'll have to try it next time I go fishing. Heh, heh, heh...


19 posted on 05/24/2006 11:05:59 AM PDT by AmericanRepublican (There are fools on both sides. Only the true Americans will prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Who published the study, the Timothy Leary Institute??

< /kidding> ;o)
20 posted on 05/24/2006 11:07:24 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson