[mrsmith]

We do not have a living constitution.

The Founders were well aware of corruption when they decided this privilege was neccessary.

The acts of the House are not subject to any Executive or Judicial process.

That the papers sought for were not covered by that privilege doesn't change the fact that papers which were privileged were examinedn by members of the Executive- and that is Hastert's complaint.

[SE Mom]

See Post # 103

[HangnJudge]

That the papers sought for were not covered by that privilege doesn't change the fact that papers which were privileged were examinedn by members of the Executive- and that is Hastert's complaint.

Better and better

But every attempt
was made to separate the Executive Branch
from awareness of un-subpoenaed materials,
by design of the executed warrant
Only lawfully pursuing the specific target of the warrent
As stated by a lawfully appointed, sitting judge

[Bahbah]

The acts of the House are not subject to any Executive or Judicial process.

These weren't "acts of the House" in the exercise of its constitutional duties. These were the acts of a felon trying to cover up his criminal activities. Isn't there a difference?