Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tertiary01; BJungNan
So less than 3 months after inauguration we have MINUTE MAN PATROLS on the Arizona border!

What does a bunch of guys running around at the border have to do with Congressional consideration of immigration reform?

You and BJung need to go back and look at the timeline. Bush outlined a plan in early 2004, then again in 2005, indicating it was a priority of his.

Sensenbrenner wrote a bill because the White House asked him to.

46 posted on 05/23/2006 11:58:48 AM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

"You and BJung need to go back and look at the timeline. Bush outlined a plan in early 2004, then again in 2005, indicating it was a priority of his."

Perhaps the President is the reason immigration's on the agenda.
But that just makes it worse, because what he has proposed is awful.


49 posted on 05/23/2006 12:01:09 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
You and BJung need to go back and look at the timeline. Bush outlined a plan in early 2004, then again in 2005, indicating it was a priority of his.

If it was a priority he would have brought it up in the debates. Nice try, but keep spinning.

53 posted on 05/23/2006 12:02:42 PM PDT by tertiary01 ( And don't waste your snide remarks on me: history will be your judge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
You and BJung need to go back and look at the timeline. Bush outlined a plan in early 2004, then again in 2005, indicating it was a priority of his.

I think you better go back and rethink your political spin on this. If border control was indeed a priority of Bush since early 2004, then the results of his efforts show him to be quite inept in his effort.

Please, don't insult everyone's intellegence. If they wanted to control the border, they could do it. If you think otherwise, then say so. But don't come here and suggest that some sort of effort has been in place. We know that if there was a will, it would of (and could of) been done.

Do you disagree with that?

62 posted on 05/23/2006 12:07:46 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
You and BJung need to go back and look at the timeline. Bush outlined a plan in early 2004, then again in 2005, indicating it was a priority of his.

I think you better go back and rethink your political spin on this. If border control was indeed a priority of Bush since early 2004, then the results of his efforts show him to be quite inept in his effort.

Please, don't insult everyone's intellegence. If they wanted to control the border, they could do it. If you think otherwise, then say so. But don't come here and suggest that some sort of effort has been in place. We know that if there was a will, it would of (and could of) been done.

Do you disagree with that?

65 posted on 05/23/2006 12:08:38 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

But Bush cut border guards in 2005 ... was supposed to add 5 or 6 thousand and he cut that figure .....


81 posted on 05/23/2006 12:18:39 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("The Americans on Flight 93 did more to counter terrorism than the Democrats have done in 4 years")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson