Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Everest climber left to die alone
Washington Times ^ | 5/23/06

Posted on 05/23/2006 8:42:02 AM PDT by Paddlefish

Mark Inglis, an amputee who conquered Mount Everest on artificial legs last week, yesterday defended his party's decision to carry on to the summit despite coming across a dying climber. As his team climbed through the "death zone," the area above 26,000 feet where the body begins to shut down, they passed David Sharp, 34, a stricken British climber who later died. His body remained on the mountain.

Mr. Inglis, 47, a New Zealander, said: "At 28,000 feet it's hard to stay alive yourself. He was in a very poor condition, near death. We talked about [what to do for him] for quite a lot at the time and it was a very hard decision. "About 40 people passed him that day, and no one else helped him apart from our expedition. Our Sherpas (guides) gave him oxygen. He wasn't a member of our expedition, he was a member of another, far less professional one." Mr. Sharp was among eight persons who have died on Everest this year, including another member of his group, a Brazilian. Dewa Sherpa, a manager at Asian Trekking, the Katmandu company that outfitted Mr. Sharp before his climb, said he had not taken enough oxygen and had no Sherpa guide.

*********

The company charges $6,000 to provide services as far as base camp -- far less than the $35,000 or more cost of guided trips to the summit. Other mountaineers have criticized the commercialism of climbing the 29,035-foot peak, with guides charging huge sums to climbers with minimal experience.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: china; climbers; clymers; davidsharp; ethics; everest; greenboots; india; markinglis; mountainclimbing; mteverest; nepal; newzealand; phurbatashi; russellbrice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 541-556 next last
To: junta

It's a very good read.

Into Thin Air : A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster (Paperback)
by Jon Krakauer

Adapted to a documentary film that was so so.


181 posted on 05/23/2006 12:40:55 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Glenn; Obadiah

In fact, if I remember correctly from Jon Krakauer's terrific book "Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Disaster at Everest", it takes monumental effort just to put one foot in front of the other.

Recommended:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0385494785/qid=1148413002/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/104-7668063-7294364?s=books&v=glance&n=283155


182 posted on 05/23/2006 12:41:18 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (We want our day: A day without hearing SPANISH ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

If he 100% abandoned he own quest for the peak and used all his resources to ATTEMPT to save the life of a human being. Assuming he was close to death, the effort would have a limited chance of success.
(s)
Then again the guy with no legs had 36,000 dollars invested in selling his future story. A 36,000 dollars expedition is more was more important than the mere possibility of saving someone's life.(/s)


183 posted on 05/23/2006 12:42:22 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
re: they are the most self absorbed bastards in the world.)))

The lure of possessing the ultimate "bragging right" does tend to dehumanize. I've seen something similar at close range. In this age of affluence, where beautiful homes and cars are no longer status symbols, the badge of the Unique Experience is the ultimate object of Desire.

184 posted on 05/23/2006 12:42:33 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Care to elaborate?

Nah, just let it die.

185 posted on 05/23/2006 12:42:59 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Would it have been possible for them to transport him back down the mountain?

Possible, but not sensible. People who are flipping out at the callousness of the other climbers have to understand what it means to climb to altitudes above 26,000 feet. As many have pointed out, simply surviving and getting yourself up/down at those altitudes is a tremendous feat.

Could the other climbers have tried to bring him down instead of pushing on to the summit? Sure. But the simple fact is that if you choose to climb to those altitudes, you also choose to accept the consequences, and you don't expect anyone else to help you if you can't make it.

Everyone who goes up there knows what's at stake. There are lots of dead bodies that will be up there for a very long time, and lots of climbers who reached the summit or returned from the summit by stepping over or around dead and/or dying climbers. Its just the way it is.

186 posted on 05/23/2006 12:43:32 PM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
"Would it have been possible for them to transport him back down the mountain?"

The man was mostly frozen. He had been there for awhile in thin air. When you are mostly frozen you are sleeping, especially in the thin air. They probably woke him up when they found him. There was nothing they could do. You can't warm him and you can't stop the continued freeze. Either your own body works, or that's the end in this place.

187 posted on 05/23/2006 12:44:34 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: hattend
What I question, is why did they give him any of their Oxygen of he was a hopeless case???

If they were to waste any of their time, why would they not give him Ox and start hauling him down?
188 posted on 05/23/2006 12:44:44 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

In the book, Krakauer comes across as a real a-hole himself; a typical lefty journalist. However, he wrote a very compelling book.


189 posted on 05/23/2006 12:44:51 PM PDT by rockinonritalin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

Wow, see post 182. Just a few seconds apart. :)


190 posted on 05/23/2006 12:45:39 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (We want our day: A day without hearing SPANISH ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Leave it freezing by the side of the thread?!?



...Just kidding! Consider it "tabled".


191 posted on 05/23/2006 12:46:00 PM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

It is difficult just to propel your own body forward in that environment. Every motion, every movement is challenging due to the environment and the altitude.

As Jon Krakauer mentions in his book of the Everest Disaster, if you hurt yourself or make a mistake, there is nothing anyone can do.


192 posted on 05/23/2006 12:48:48 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (We want our day: A day without hearing SPANISH ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
It's simple math. Attempting to save one dying man could have killed them all. They were at an elevation where brain damage has already started from lack of oxygen. They had to get back down to thicker atmosphere before they started dying too.

The article says they made their decision to leave him on the way up, not down. If the guy was still responding & able to take nourishment, some of the 40 man group could {should?] have tried to get him down to the highest established camp which I think would be at about 22,000 feet.

193 posted on 05/23/2006 12:50:08 PM PDT by citizen (Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name! And the White House has a fence around it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
But not enough to carry a dying man down with them.

Huh? Where is that indicated in the article? They had sufficient oxygen to share some with the man while they paused on their upward trek, and they obviously had enough to both continue to the summit, and then descend.

There is no indication that they could not have simply ceased their attempt to reach the summit, and used the consequently conserved oxygen to supply the dying man during an attempt to get him down to a lower elevation.

Frankly, I view this as a reasonable argument for imposition of the old tort rule that once you've commenced aid (giving a little oxygen), you are duty bound to continue with that aid in the saving of a human life, or you may be held liable for the resulting death if the death could have been prevented by the continuation of aid.

This is pretty shocking behavior.

194 posted on 05/23/2006 12:53:36 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: rockinonritalin

I read "Into Thin Air" in about seven non-stop hours. I literally couldn't put it down. When I finished it, I didn't sleep well for a few days.

Jon's latest, "Under the Banner of Heaven", is sort of a drive-by shooting of some sects of the LDS church. He comes across in his (admittedly, very capable) writing as a sneering elitist. At the epilogue, he admits to being an atheist.

Still a good read.


195 posted on 05/23/2006 12:55:02 PM PDT by IslandJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Paddlefish

The first thing they teach you as a first responder is don't put yourself into a position where you become a casualty yourself. 'cuz now, you have 2 casualties.


196 posted on 05/23/2006 12:56:18 PM PDT by roaddog727 (eludium PU36 explosive space modulator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

His "Into the Wild" book was good too. I believe it was before the Everest one.


197 posted on 05/23/2006 12:58:50 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (We want our day: A day without hearing SPANISH ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

"I am Supertramp!" ;-)


198 posted on 05/23/2006 1:01:16 PM PDT by IslandJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
Frankly, I view this as a reasonable argument for imposition of the old tort rule that once you've commenced aid (giving a little oxygen), you are duty bound to continue with that aid in the saving of a human life, or you may be held liable for the resulting death if the death could have been prevented by the continuation of aid.

That would create a strong incentive to provide no assistance at all.

199 posted on 05/23/2006 1:02:46 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent (Chloe rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

I read Krakauer's book. I also went to hear Beck Weathers this past fall at a lecture (he was the miracle survivor). And just to make sure I got the whole story, I read "The Climb" by Bookreev, giving his version of the disaster. I'm pretty convinced these climbers/sherpas did all they could for this soul.


200 posted on 05/23/2006 1:03:06 PM PDT by Glenn (Annoy a BushBot...Think for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 541-556 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson