Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Essential President Bush [Bush did not abandon us; we abandoned him]
The Anchoress ^ | 05/22/06 | The Anchoress

Posted on 05/22/2006 6:16:18 PM PDT by M. Thatcher

A much-esteemed, long-neglected friend sent an email this morning, which was delightful to recieve. At one point he mentioned this post from yesterday and wrote: I think (President Bush) has lost his bearings. but then, so did Moses from time to time, it’s quite understandable.

That made me wonder a little - has President Bush lost his bearings, or have we? Is it President Bush who has broken faith with “his base” or have they?

When I read my friend’s line, I thought of a line from Pride and Prejudice, in which Elizabeth Bennett says in new appreciation of Mr. Darcy, “In essentials, I believe, he is very much what he ever was.”

Perhaps I am a dim bulb, but President Bush has never surprised me, and that is probably why I have never felt let down or “betrayed” by him. He is, in essentials, precisely whom he has ever been. He did not surprise me when he managed, in August of 2001, to find a morally workable solution in the matter of Embryonic Stem Cells. He did not surprise me when, a month later, he stood on a pile of rubble and lifted a broken city from its knees. When my NYFD friends told me of the enormous consolation and strength he brought to his meetings with grieving families, I was not surprised. When the World Series opened in New York City and the President was invited to throw the first pitch, there was no surprise in his throwing (while wearing body armor) a perfect strike.

He did not surprise me when he spoke eloquently from the National Cathedral, or again before the Joint Houses of Congress, when he laid out the Bush Doctrine. He did not surprise me when he did it again at West Point, or when he went visionary at Whitehall (don’t try to find a tape of it, honey, that was ONE SPEECH C-Span never re-ran and the press quickly tried to move along from).

There were no surprises in President Bush’s invasion of Afghanistan to battle AlQaeda. There were no surprises when he went after an Iraq which everyone believed had WMD, an Iraq that had tried to assassinate an American President, an Iraq whose NYC consul did not lower its flag to half-mast after 9/11.

Actually, there was one surprise. He did surprise me by going back to the UN, and back to the UN, in that mythical “rush to war” we heard so much about. But then again, the effort in Iraq was never as “unilateral” as it had been painted.

President Bush did not surprise me when, faced with the scorn of “the world community” and those ever-ready A.N.S.W.E.R. marches which sprang up condemning him and Tony Blair, he stood firm. A lesser man, a mere politician, would have folded under such enormous pressure. I was not surprised when Bush did not. (Aside - it’s funny how they just can’t get a good-sized crowd together for those protests these days, innit? Everything about Iraq was “wrong” and everything about Iraq is “failure and quagmire” and yet, somehow, we all breathe a sigh of relief that the job is done, that Saddam is out of power and that Iraq, save a very small piece of troubled land, is - in remarkably short order (and despite the wild pronouncements of John Murtha) - tasting its first morsels of democracy and liberty, and showing promise.)

It never surprised me that Yassar Arafat, formerly the “most welcomed” foreign “Head of State” in the Clinton White House was not welcomed - ever - to the Bush White House.

I wasn’t surprised by the, not one, but two tax cuts he got passed through congress, or the roaring economy - and jobs - those tax cuts created. I wasn’t surprised when he killed the unending farce that is the Kyoto treaty (remember, the thing Al Gore and the Senate unanimously voted down under Clinton?), or when he killed U.S. involvement in the International Criminal Court, or when he told the UN they risked becoming irrelevent, or when he told the Congress and the world, “America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.” Not surprising.

I wasn’t surprised at all to watch him - in a foreign and hostile land - go rescue the Secret Service agent who was being detained and kept from protecting him. Or to see him shoot his cuffs, afterwards, and greet his host with a smile.

I was never surprised that he tried to “change the tone” or tried reaching across the aisle to invite onesuch as Ted Kennedy to help draft education reform, something none of his predecessors dared touch. Just as they never dared to try to reform social security or our energy policies. The feckless ones in Congress wouldn’t get the jobs done, unfortunately, but he is a president who at least tried to get something going on those “dangerous” issues. His senior prescription plan was unsurprising and it is helping lots of people.

I was not at all to surprised to see President Bush forego the “trembling lip photo-op” moment in which most world-leaders indulged after the Christmas Tsunami of 2004 in order to get real work done, to bring immediate help to that area by co-ordinating our own military (particularly our Naval support) with Australia and Japan. Stupid, stingy American. I was surprised, actually, to see him dance with free Georgians. I didn’t think he danced.

Let me tell you what has surprised me about George W. Bush. I have been surprised by his ability to keep from attacking-in-kind the “public servants” in Washington who - for five years - have not been able to speak of the American President with the respect he is due, by virtue of both his office and his humanity, because they are entralled with hate and owned by opportunism. I have been surprised that he has kept his committment to “changing the tone” even when it has long been clear that the only way the tone in Washington will ever change is if everyone named Bush or Clinton or Kennedy is cleared out and “career politicians” are shown the door and - it must be said - every university “School of Journalism” is converted to a daisy garden, maaaan. We are stardust. We are golden.

I wasn’t surprised when President Bush thought that New Orleans had dodged a bullet after Hurricane Katrina, and therefore let down his guard. After all, we all thought NOLA had done so. I wasn’t surprised that he had - similarly to his actions the year before, re Hurricane Charlie - asked the Democrat Governor of Louisiana (and the Mayor) to order evacuations and suggested to her that she put the issue under Fed control to speed up processes (she did not, btw for a long while). But I was surprised that, when the press picked and choosed their stories while launching an unprecedented, emotion-charged, often completely inaccurate (10,000 bodies!) attack on the President - the rising waters were all his fault and he was suddenly “the uncaring racist attempting genocide by indifference” the President did not fight back against the sea of made-up news and boilerplate, fantastic charges against him.

I was surprised, and what surprised me was the sense I had that Bush’s heart was broken. That he had done everything he could to keep faith with the nation, and that he could not believe that in a time of such terrible need, all some people could think of was, “how do we use this politically, how do we break Bush with this?” It can’t have helped that some of the hysteria was coming from the right as well as the left. Things changed after that, didn’t they? The press and the left doubled up their attacks, the far-right went very smug, and President Bush never has seemed to have regrouped his spirit.

A month later, I wasn’t surprised (although some - mostly the hard-right “I’m a Conservative before I’m anything and he’d better serve me” types - clearly were) when he nominated Harriett Miers to the SCOTUS. In fact, I’d predicted it. Up until that moment, every person President Bush had nominated to pretty much any position had won accolades from the beamish far-right, but Miers did not. She wasn’t one of their guys or gals. She wasn’t Luttig, she wasn’t Rogers-Brown. Harriet Miers? Damn that Bush! The denouncements came fast and furious and suddenly “the base” with which George W. Bush had not broken faith…broke faith with him. Suddenly they were as willing to call him a moron and an idiot as any KozKid.

Imagine that. Imagine being the guy who has given his base one splendid nominee after another, in all manner of posts, make a nomination he thinks appropriate only to find that “base” coming out with both guns, defaming his nominee and directing all manner of insult at himself. President Bush is nothing if not loyal; his loyalty is often his downfall. When he asked for a little trust (which he had surely earned) a little loyalty and a little faith, from “the base,” he got kicked in the groin, over and over again, for daring to think differently, for falling out of lockstep with his policy-wonk “betters.”

That had to be bitter, for him. At that point Bush, unchanged in essentials, might have wondered if his conservative “base” had become a bit over-confident and loose-hipped, so cock-sure of their majority (not that congress used it) so certain of their own brilliance that they were beginning to believe they didn’t need him; that he wasn’t conservative enough, after all, and that the next president was going to be the solid, “uncompassionate” conservative they’d really wanted all along. The president who had delivered one gift after another to his base asked them to trust him, and his base sneered.

Then of course, the DPW debacle was launched and once again the far-right, his “base” went beserk, again, for very dubious reasons. Buster was the one who pointed out to me, then, that in this matter President Bush was being entirely consistent with who he had always been and that his defense of the sale was not unsound, nor unprecedented. The right didn’t care! They stomped their feet and went DU again. Even Rush Limbaugh couldn’t control them. The left, on the other hand, which should have supported the president - they would have had he been anyone else - simply exploited what they could of it.

And now, the Great Big Immigration Imbroglio of ‘06 has turned “the base” quite vicious. President Bush is no longer simply a moron or an idiot to his base, he is a bad man. He is a bad American. He is a bad president. Everything he does now, is wrong. As yesterday’s WSJ pointed out, Bush is closer to the deified Ronald Reagan on this issue than anyone on the right wants to admit. And they’d never do to Reagan what they are doing to Bush. Let’s look at a few Reagan quotes on the nature of those “far-right” conservatives, mmkay?

‘When I began entering into the give and take of legislative bargaining in Sacramento, a lot of the most radical conservatives who had supported me during the election didn’t like it.

Compromise was a dirty word to them and they wouldn’t face the fact that we couldn’t get all of what we wanted today. They wanted all or nothing and they wanted it all at once. If you don’t get it all, some said, don’t take anything.

‘I’d learned while negotiating union contracts that you seldom got everything you asked for. And I agreed with FDR, who said in 1933: ‘I have no expectations of making a hit every time I come to bat. What I seek is the highest possible batting average.’

‘If you got seventy-five or eighty percent of what you were asking for, I say, you take it and fight for the rest later, and that’s what I told these radical conservatives who never got used to it.’

Mr. Reagan, I salute you. I did not vote for you. Twice. I came too late to appreciation of you. But sir, some of us have been saying the same thing to “the base” for a few weeks now. They’re still not listening. They won’t, I imagine, until they absolutely must. And perhaps it will take a staggering defeat for that to happen.

President Bush’s immigration policies have not changed materially since he was Governor of Texas. You folks knew that when you elected him, twice. He has not changed, cannot change, because his policies arise not from his poll numbers but from his convictions and his conscience. You used to love that about him. Can everything, everything that needs to be done BE done, and all as you would have it done, in the real world, a world of bitter bipartisanship and a corrupted press?

Some say that the GOP should consider “losing in ‘06 to win in ‘08.” Some conservatives say that they’re going to not vote - to sit out an election or vote for a third party candidate to “teach the GOP a lesson.”

The far-right gwwwwarks like a cracker-obsessed parrot: Bush has abandoned the base, he’s abandoned the base, he’s abandoned the base.

Ever stop to think maybe the president feels his base has abandoned him, that uncontent with 75%, they’ve simply moved beyond reason? Ever stop to think that while you’re calling the president every despicable name in the book and demanding his fealty or you’ll “teach him a lesson,” that perhaps there is a lesson you need to learn? That a good man, disinterested in merely laughing or crying for the camera for 8 years and looking to do a difficult job in the face of unprecedented hate, unprecedent speed of communication, unprecedented global instability, unprecedented backstabbing from within his own CIA, deserves some loyalty and the benefit of a doubt as he tries to bring you the 75% you so callously spit back at him as insufficient?

We do not know everything we think we know. Nothing is static; everything is in flux, and it is very likely that more is at work here, on many levels, than any of us can dream. There are things seen and unseen. Think about it.

Here is a question, and I’ll be writing on it some more during the week, but start thinking about it, now: HOW DO YOU RECEIVE A GOOD?

How you receive a good has a lot to do with whether any more “good” comes your way. The Conservatives got a “good” in 2000 and 2004; they’re receiving it very badly, indeed. I think the throwing-under-the-bus-of-George-W-Bush by “the base” is one of the most shameful things I have ever witnessed in all my years of watching politics, from both sides of the political spectrum. How do you receive a good?

President Bush has never surprised me. He is, in essentials, the man he ever was. It does not surprise me that he is a Christian man living a creed before he is a President, that he is a President before he is a Conservative. It seems to me precisely the right order of things.


You “base” have received a great good. You’ve forgotten it. Continue to do so at your - at all our - great peril.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baselessbase; blogs; bordertalkforbidden; bush43; bushbothomage; bushbotlovefest; bushbotsdeifygw; bushbotsspinliketops; elephanteatsownhead; fellatingbushbots; finggagme; mexicanspokenhere; presidentbush; rinowaterholethread; speakerpelosi; vivalarevolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 701-716 next last
To: Mo1

Hi!


281 posted on 05/23/2006 9:18:41 AM PDT by Pippin (Bush supporter for ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; Mo1
A co-worker just told me that President Bush asked Gov. Jeb Bush to run for President in '08.

I hope this is true and that Gov. Bush decides to run.

282 posted on 05/23/2006 9:21:02 AM PDT by Pippin (Bush supporter for ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

I agree with this article soooo much. Bush should be Sainted. He is a God. Not just any god, a God! To criticize is to blaspheme. HE knows what is good for us. The burdens of our sins are on HIS shoulders, I don't know how he can bear the burden.


283 posted on 05/23/2006 9:22:10 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

Sarcasm?


284 posted on 05/23/2006 9:23:02 AM PDT by Pippin (Bush supporter for ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
There isn't a single person on this forum who marches in 'lockstep.'

So, what policy or decision has W made in the past 6 years that you disagree with, and have voiced your displeasure with?

The people you have problems with are the real base........us.

Allow me to invoke Ronaldus Magnus, "There you go again."

285 posted on 05/23/2006 9:25:05 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
When the Pendulum swings far enough to the right, it ends up on the left. There is very little difference between the far right and the far left, because neither of them are electable
286 posted on 05/23/2006 9:25:13 AM PDT by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
I have vocally (on this forum) opposed CFR and the Guest Worker/ Illigal immigration policy.

Not that you'll let the truth get in the way of your stereotype........

The President's base are Conservative Republicans like me. His base does not consist of Buchananites or libertarians. And his base has supported him in record numbers all through his Presidency.

The extremists on this forum have NEVER supported him, but they have grown increasingly angry and out of control, and now they are in danger of doing real damage to the conservative movement. (And they always invoke the name of Ronald Reagan, whom they also failed to support).

Conservatives actually think, DTogo..........and these people do nothing more than feel.

287 posted on 05/23/2006 9:31:32 AM PDT by ohioWfan (When you can't tell the difference between the 'base' and DU, the problem is not with the President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Pippin

Hi, Pippin!

Pipster, Pipparooni. . . all those!


288 posted on 05/23/2006 9:31:51 AM PDT by Flyer (Xenalyte is having a Hoop Skirt Hullabaloo all week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Pippin

"Sarcasm?"

I am never sarcastic. I truly do stand in awe of Harriet Meiers, CFR, no vetoes, a doubled budget, open borders, the education department, compassionate conservatism, and everything and anything George Bush and his family says or does. Only abject loyalty is worthy of such a great man. Only when you are a true believer will you be allowed into the Kingdom of the Republican Elite. Others will be raked on the coals for deviating from the geocentric orthodoxy, and who am I to be raked. Certainly, GW is the best we could have gotten, and there is no hope for anything better.


289 posted on 05/23/2006 9:31:56 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I was just coming home in the car and have Rush Limbaugh's show on. Someone named Mark Belling (?) is filling in for Rush today.

He's taken at least one call from someone who lives in Texas and I think the other call was from someone in another border state.

They both just said what those of us who aren't hysterical border thread jumpers have been saying. They said that everyone they've talked with likes the president's plan.

They don't agree with all aspects of it and some people do wish it was a little stronger on various issues, but that at least the president is trying to do something. One caller even said most people he talked with are fine with the Senate's plan (considered less stringent than the House plan) and that most people are VERY angry at Congress for balking the president and arguing instead of actually DOING something.


290 posted on 05/23/2006 9:32:12 AM PDT by Peach (DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

And I should have added that Mark Belling (?) himself said that although he doesn't like all aspects of the president's plan, he's trying to do something vs. the nothing that has been done for 30 years.


291 posted on 05/23/2006 9:32:51 AM PDT by Peach (DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote; Pippin
Not sarcasm, Pippin........the rantings of insanity.

But very revealing about what is, or is NOT inside Bush haters.

In a word, what is missing............decency.

292 posted on 05/23/2006 9:33:35 AM PDT by ohioWfan (When you can't tell the difference between the 'base' and DU, the problem is not with the President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Flyer

:o)


293 posted on 05/23/2006 9:35:08 AM PDT by Pippin (Bush supporter for ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I need to turn Rush's show on.

Sounds like Mark is making more sense than Rush has been making lately.

Maybe Mark doesn't read FR and think the hysterical speak for other conservatives.

Good for him!

294 posted on 05/23/2006 9:35:58 AM PDT by ohioWfan (When you can't tell the difference between the 'base' and DU, the problem is not with the President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

Oh Brother!


295 posted on 05/23/2006 9:36:12 AM PDT by Pippin (Bush supporter for ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
Bush should be Sainted. He is a God. Not just any god, a God! To criticize is to blaspheme. HE knows what is good for us. The burdens of our sins are on HIS shoulders, I don't know how he can bear the burden.

If you believe that's what the article says, suggest you take a remedial reading course.

296 posted on 05/23/2006 9:36:39 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

The opinion shapers on this forum have moved normally good freepers into hysteria mode. It's unseemly and embarrassing.


297 posted on 05/23/2006 9:37:12 AM PDT by Peach (DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

That too!


298 posted on 05/23/2006 9:37:43 AM PDT by Pippin (Bush supporter for ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
The problem isn't with the disagreement, DT. The problem is with the vile attacks.

Same problem I had with the Harriet Miers discussions. There is no excuse for a lynch mob.

The President's signing of McCain's CFR was a disaster and IMHO disrespectful of the Constitution. His imposition of steel tariffs was wrong. He has tolerated some weak sisters in his cabinet for far too long -- especially underperformin' Norman. I can't stand the smirks. He has not shown leadership on Federal Spending. He should have had Jihad Johnny Lindh shot as a traitor instead of sympathizing with him.

I could list other disagreements I have with the President. Nevertheless I still support him -- because there are so many issues, many listed on this thread, where he has done well.

He has not earned the hatred and vile attacks from the Left -- much less from the Right. Jorge, betrayal, traitor -- this is complete garbage. People using these terms reveal themselves as bitter haters and lunatic fringers.

Free Republic is an appropriate site for tough, uncompromising, frank criticism of ANY politician, including the President. It is NOT the appropriate site for vile attacks and personal venom -- the right site for that is DU.

299 posted on 05/23/2006 9:38:43 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

Brilliant...moving...thought provoking...

shame on US.


300 posted on 05/23/2006 9:38:52 AM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 701-716 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson