Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigrant smugglers avoid prosecution- Only 6 percent of 289 were prosecuted
seattlepi ^ | Friday, May 19, 2006 ยท Last updated 11:44 a.m. PT | ELLIOT SPAGAT

Posted on 05/21/2006 1:02:13 PM PDT by dennisw

SAN DIEGO -- The vast majority of people caught smuggling immigrants across the border near San Diego are never prosecuted for the offense, demoralizing the agents making the arrests, according to an internal Border Patrol document obtained by The Associated Press.

"It is very difficult to keep agents' morale up when the laws they were told to uphold are being watered-down or not prosecuted," the report says.

The report offers a stark assessment of the situation at a Border Patrol station responsible for guarding 13 miles of mountainous border east of the city. Federal officials say it reflects a reality along the entire 2,000-mile border: Judges and federal attorneys are so swamped that only the most egregious smuggling cases are prosecuted.

Only 6 percent of 289 suspected immigrant smugglers were prosecuted by the federal government for that offense in the year ending in September 2004, according to the report. Some were instead prosecuted for another crime. Other cases were declined by federal prosecutors, or the suspect was released by the Border Patrol.

The report raises doubts about the value of tightening security along the Mexican border. President Bush wants to hire 6,000 more Border Patrol agents and dispatch up to 6,000 National Guardsmen. He did not mention overburdened courts in his Oval Office address Monday on immigration.

The report was provided to the AP by the office of Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who has accused the chief federal prosecutor in San Diego of being lax on smuggling cases. Issa's office said it was an internal Border Patrol report written last August. It was unclear who wrote it.

The lack of prosecutions is "demoralizing the agents and making a joke out of our system of justice," said T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council, which represents agents. "It is certainly a weak link in our immigration-enforcement chain."

The 41-page report says federal prosecutors in San Diego typically prosecute smugglers who commit "dangerous/violent activity" or guide at least 12 illegal immigrants across the border. But other smugglers know they are only going to get "slapped on the wrist," according to the report.

The report cites a 19-year-old U.S. citizen caught three times in a two-week period in 2004 trying to sneak people from Tijuana, Mexico, to San Diego in his car trunk, two at a time.

"This is an example of a kid who knows the system," the report says. "What is true is that he will probably never be prosecuted if he only smuggles only one or two bodies at a time."

The report also cites a Mexican citizen who was caught in Arizona and California driving with illegal immigrants and was released each time to Mexico. He was prosecuted the fourth time, when two illegal immigrants in his van died in a crash, and sentenced to five years in prison.

U.S. Attorney Carol Lam in San Diego said about half her 110 attorneys work on border cases in an area where the Border Patrol made nearly 140,000 arrests last year. She said she gives highest priority to the most serious cases, including suspects with long histories of violent crime or offenders who endanger others' lives.

"We figure out how many cases our office can handle, start from the worst and work our way down," she said.

Lam said many suspected migrant smugglers are prosecuted instead for re-entering the country after being deported, a crime that can be proved with documents. Smuggling cases are more difficult to prosecute because they require witnesses to testify.

The Border Patrol, which would neither confirm nor deny the document's authenticity, said prosecutors in San Diego recently agreed to prosecute a Top 20 list of smugglers if they are caught.

The Justice Department in Washington declined to comment. However, at a congressional hearing last month, Rep. Ric Keller, R-Fla., told Attorney General Alberto Gonzales that Lam's record on migrant smuggling was "a pathetic failure." Gonzales replied that he was urging U.S. attorneys to more actively enforce laws but noted that immigration cases were "a tremendous strain and burden" along the border.

Peter Nunez, a former U.S. attorney in San Diego, said prosecutors along the border struggle with limited resources and a huge caseload of immigration cases.

"This is not an indictment of the U.S. Attorney's Office, because you have to deal with the realities of the caseload, but it is an indictment of how badly Congress and presidents have handled the immigration system," he said.

The report says immigrants in the area paid an average of $1,398 to be guided across the border in 2004.

"Smugglers are making lots of money breaking the immigration laws, and there is not much incentive for them to stop these illegal activities," it says. "The smugglers know that even if they are caught, it will be difficult to punish them."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bigsurprise; borderlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: vetsvette

Really? Appointing Roberts and Alito was "not conservative" enough for you?


21 posted on 05/21/2006 2:03:44 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: calex59; All

What more can one expect ??

. When you live in the reality of .

'FULL TIME CRIME & PART TIME JUSTICE'

'S'


22 posted on 05/21/2006 2:05:15 PM PDT by Spider Web
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

BTTT


23 posted on 05/21/2006 2:08:06 PM PDT by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
The National Guard is going to do what?

Become known as the "Water Buffalo Soldiers"?

24 posted on 05/21/2006 2:16:24 PM PDT by Covenantor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper

In case you haven't seen this. Discouraging, ain't it?


25 posted on 05/21/2006 2:23:04 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Toss out the laws and we won't have to prosecute anyone. Sound okay? Fox thinks so.


26 posted on 05/21/2006 2:24:11 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

ROFLMAO


27 posted on 05/21/2006 2:24:35 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

BTTT


28 posted on 05/21/2006 2:32:26 PM PDT by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Are you O.K. with "plea bargains" for other crimes?


29 posted on 05/21/2006 2:40:43 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Not only that but an obscene monumental waste of tax resources.. time.. and energy..

Anything I guess is not too much for the White RINO House to placate the base..

This attitude and disconnect starts directly at the White RINO House..

UNforgivable and Seditious or WORSE...

30 posted on 05/21/2006 2:53:27 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Actually, it looks like he might have done okay with Roberts and Alito, although the jury is still out on them and neither really meet the criteria for Justices on which he ran: "in the mold of Justices Thomas and Scalia."

Furthermore, he tried his level best to follow his liberal instincts vis a vis the Alito nomination by attempting to seat a female David Souter in the person of Harriet Miers. Would she have been that bad? Who knows? But, he didn't know either -- he named her for "liberal" reasons and in furtherance of the advice given to him by Harry Reid, not his base.

No conservative: would have allowed Ted Kennedy to write the 1st major piece of legislation he pushed after his election (the education bill which, in the end, was nothing but liberal tripe and devoid of any of the things he said were mandatory to get his signature); would have signed that abomination to the 1st Amendment, "Campaign Finance Reform" (also missing all of the things he claimed to be mandatory when he ran); would have permitted the Federal Government budgets to grow at 2X+ the rate they grew under Clinton; the biggest increase in entitlements vis a vis the Medicare Drug Benefit; and on and on.

The man may not be a flaming leftist, but he's a liberal through and through - of that there's little doubt. He only got my vote because the alternatives were so pitiful, not because he's conservative in any meaningful way.
31 posted on 05/21/2006 3:06:31 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

The same situation occurs in the Nogales sector in Arizona.


32 posted on 05/21/2006 3:41:10 PM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul

Wait a minute! Maybe it's the coyotes 'doing jobs Americans don't want to do.'


33 posted on 05/21/2006 3:56:43 PM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Sheriff Joe for PRESIDENT.


34 posted on 05/21/2006 3:57:07 PM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bboop

Agree with that.


35 posted on 05/21/2006 4:03:14 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Most other crimes get "plea bargains" too - is that "Not very encouraging" as well?

Show where in the article it said they have been pled down.

36 posted on 05/21/2006 4:05:33 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Governor of California, another job Americans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Not in Maricopa County under Sheriff Joe Aripio. Smugglers and conspirators (the poor unfortuante udocumented entrants that hired the smuggler)

The people smugglers are not the enemy. At least they go back to Mexico. The illegal alien intruders are my enemy because America is my country and they ate invading it

37 posted on 05/21/2006 4:52:59 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

My new county....Sheriff Joe ~ Bump!


38 posted on 05/21/2006 5:13:19 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gaspar

Yeah, I've been reading about Nogales.


39 posted on 05/21/2006 5:14:30 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Is the Landing Ship and ships crew sitting off-shore disembarking the amphibious landing force your enemy; or just the landing force once they are feet dry?


40 posted on 05/21/2006 5:17:16 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson