Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lieberman's In Trouble
Hartford Courant ^ | May 21, 2006 | Kevin Rennie

Posted on 05/21/2006 9:39:33 AM PDT by nj26

From the start of the Democratic state convention Friday night, there was something different from past gatherings of the faithful. Even U.S. Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, always a crowd favorite, could not work his usual magic with a speech nominating his senatorial colleague Joseph I. Lieberman for re-election. He sounded hackneyed compared to Annie Lamont's earnest seconding speech for her insurgent husband.

A Dodd tub-thumper on the virtues of being a Democrat is typically guaranteed to get the delegates in their seats and then on their feet. Not on Friday. His meandering address avoided getting to Lieberman until he had paid his respect to Democrats up and down the ballot and across the state. He even tipped his hat to challenger Ned Lamont. His nomination of Lieberman was more a tribute to diverse opinions in the party than a testimonial for Lieberman.

It fell flat but raised an essential question: Can Joe Lieberman win over Democrats by acknowledging the public's hostility to the war in Iraq but not altering his support for it? Friday night's balloting bodes ill for the humble but haughty strategy.

When Ned Lamont captured a staggering third of the 1,509 votes cast Friday, the green challenger's handlers were the most surprised camp in Hartford's Expo Center. The Lamont campaign got a late start this past winter and wondered as recently as a week ago if it would reach the 15 percent threshold required to get on the ballot without resorting to the laborious petition alternative. In the end, Lamont showed support across the state. (I was surprised too, and point out that a week ago I dismissed Lieberman consultant Roy Occhiogrosso's prediction that Lamont could get 30 to 40 percent of the vote.)

The Lieberman people seemed dispirited all night. His demonstrators waved and rubbed together curious-looking wiener-shaped balloons advising "Stick With Joe" as they made their way through the aisles in a short, obligatory demonstration to the tune of "Still the One." They became animated only when "Soul Man" came over the sound system, providing a cover to stop chanting and start dancing.

Discomfort turned to pain for the Lieberman campaign when the first town in the 1st Congressional District began the roll call: Barkhamsted cast its two votes for Lamont. The challenger received votes in town after town, sometimes one at a time, sometimes considerably more. When once Lieberman-friendly Windsor cast 13 of its 17 votes for Lamont, a roar of surprise filled the hall. Lamont would sail past the crucial 15 percent threshold before reaching his 4th Congressional District stronghold. Lieberman ought to be grateful it was not a secret ballot. If it had been, some of the 100 missing delegates might have found the backbone to vote.

Delegation leaders revealed more than they may have intended with the tributes to home that preceded the casting of votes. East Haddam reminded the crowd that it's Dodd's hometown and then cast three of its five votes for Lamont. Lebanon announced that it's Dodd's birthplace and tossed three of its four votes for Lamont. If anyone thinks saving the sub base (and one can't fail to mention 30,000 jobs) will rescue Lieberman in southeastern Connecticut, take a look at the roll call. Yes, Groton went for Lieberman 9-4, but neighboring New London stuck the shiv in with six of 11 for Lamont.

The darkest omens for Lieberman came near the end of the night when Southbury, nearly the last to vote, announced it was still waiting for a response to a winter invitation to Lieberman to meet. Until he does, Southbury cast five votes for Lamont, three abstentions and zero for Lieberman. One of the night's loudest cheers rang out.

By now, the Lieberman crowd was beaten, even with 65 percent of the vote. A curiosity in January, the Lamont campaign has become a growing army that could overthrow the incumbent in the Aug. 8 primary. For 90 minutes, party loyalists who have known Joe Lieberman for decades rose and turned their backs on him in favor of an engaging stranger.

The proceedings ended with the crowd ignoring another state party icon. When U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, bounced onto the stage to accept the nomination on Lieberman's behalf, the crowd beat a retreat to the hospitality tents outside. DeLauro addressed the backs of heads while history marched on to the state's first primary challenge of an incumbent U.S. senator.

Kevin Rennie is a lawyer and a former Republican state lawmaker. His column appears every Sunday.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; cratshappyrinoscry; demprimary; dodd; lieberman; nedlamont; rinoswantmorelikejoe; senate2006; traitorouscriminals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: ncountylee

New rule at the DNC... you 'gotta be a traitor too.


21 posted on 05/21/2006 10:19:23 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nj26

So much for the smoke and mirors the DNC spew about being "centrist" and representing the American people. They my cave to the radical left on this one which may lose the seat entirely.


22 posted on 05/21/2006 10:20:09 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
Yep, this race is being influenced by leftist like KOS. Don't know much about CT politics though... my uneducated guess is that a leftist has a good chance up there.


23 posted on 05/21/2006 10:28:00 AM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nj26
Article: By now, the Lieberman crowd was beaten, even with 65 percent of the vote.

This entire article is spin. Lieberman won with a 30% margin. And he's beaten? Puh-leeze. I'm not a Lieberman fan, but it sounds like the writer is a Republican liberal (of the Christine Whitman persuasion) prematurely cheering on Lieberman's political demise.
24 posted on 05/21/2006 10:31:13 AM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

That 85% figure should be considered derived in the context of having to vote in a way to follow the Dem party line. Certainly some of those votes could be considered "throw aways" to achieve other objectives. The only thing Joe has in common these days with the Dems is a pro labor bent which in certain cases is given short shrift by the Repubs.


25 posted on 05/21/2006 10:39:12 AM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nj26

This is another example of the Bolshecrats devouring the moderate Democrats. I don't understand why the moderates don't recognize this and continue
solidarity with the Demoviks. The moderates would be better off switching parties than to be picked off by the looney left. In the primaries the loonies start off with 50%. The Dummycrats need only pick up 10% of the middle to win in the general election. A good Republican should be able to knock off a Despicable candidate.


26 posted on 05/21/2006 10:45:53 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Democrats are socialists without the honesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pittsburg Phil

I agree. It's tempting to say "Poor old Joe," but this guy abandoned all pro-life principles when he ran as Gore's veep in 2000, and he would never vote with the Republicans to break a filibuster. Good riddance. I would MUCH prefer that BOTH parties became "purer" and made the choices clearer. Let's have REAL debates about these issues, so that people can see where legislation will end up in 10 years.


27 posted on 05/21/2006 10:56:25 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Lieberman has something like an 85% liberal vote ranking and the democrats aren't happy?

Lieberman is against Islamofascism and supports Israel's right to exist. This makes him unacceptable to many Democrats.

28 posted on 05/21/2006 11:14:11 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear
I suspect you're right. But it is possible their candidate is so whacked out that they may experience the oft threatened election boycott the Republicans are planning to show the President they are upset.

In that case, the party that registers the most dead voters will win.

29 posted on 05/21/2006 11:38:05 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

nah when the truth comes out casy loses plus nj and md go red


30 posted on 05/21/2006 12:08:17 PM PDT by italianquaker (Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I hope Lieberman gets reelected and then switches parties.


31 posted on 05/21/2006 12:09:59 PM PDT by no dems (I guess I'm a "Johnny one-note" type voter, but I'll keep singing out against abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pittsburg Phil
We do not have allot of choices here in CT. - Ct Republicans got him elected to get rid of RHINO Lowell Weicker(sp?) the worst of the worst
32 posted on 05/21/2006 12:13:57 PM PDT by underbyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
I agree with the sentiment but if Lieberman ever switched parties it would be a coup for Republicans and a nail in the coffin for Democrats. Their nominee for Vice President in 2000 switched parties because of what his party believes is his too tough stance on National Security????

Joe may be many things not conducive to the Republican party but he is tough on Defense.

I say the Republicans should trade away Lincoln Chafee in return for Lieberman. The Republicans would lose nothing and the democrats would ooze embarrassment for years to come.
33 posted on 05/21/2006 12:14:55 PM PDT by Republican Red ("How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

"Says to me that Democrats are intolerant even reactionary, and that their so-called party, lacks diversity."

How can you say that about the Party of the Big Tent? Shame on you.


34 posted on 05/21/2006 12:15:31 PM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

No, the perception given by the article is accurate. For a sitting senator, these nominations are a formality. Party officials are the LAST people to throw an incumbent overboard, because they have the most to gain from propping up the machine and the most to lose from pissing off an incumbent who looks to stay on. Lamont wasn't supposed to get his 15%. The Lieberman machine in the big cities had to twist a lot of arms to get this result.


35 posted on 05/21/2006 12:15:50 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Well, let's hope so but I know there's a lot of folks (including some Freepers) who want to "punish" Santorum for his support of Arlen the RINO.


36 posted on 05/21/2006 12:17:59 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

i know but they will pay then


37 posted on 05/21/2006 12:19:51 PM PDT by italianquaker (Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: headstamp
Who's running on the Republican side in this?

I'm wondering the same thing. I'd be willing to trade Lieberman for a Republican, even a RINO, so long as he votes with the Republicans to break filibusters. On the other hand, I'd hate to trade Lieberman for another far left wing Democrat.

38 posted on 05/21/2006 2:37:21 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Alan Schlesinger, former State Representative

He is a self-described Moderate-Conservative, but is better than Lieberman, and a ton better than Lamont or Wiecker.

www.schlesinger2006.com
39 posted on 05/21/2006 4:59:39 PM PDT by MassachusettsGOP (Massachusetts Republican....A rare breed indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
Exactly. I'm sick of all of the uninformed FReepers that think he's anything but a partisan hack. I believe his ACU rating for '04 was 0%. Yep, one of the most liberal folks in the Senate. He's a disgrace, and showed his true colors as a VP canididate- a lying sack of shiite just like Gore...

Specter or Lieberman... Get real, no contest

40 posted on 05/21/2006 5:11:03 PM PDT by NYC Republican (GOP is the worst political party, except for all the others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson