Skip to comments.
Sourcery's Noteworthy Sci/Tech News Roundup
Various sources
| 2005-05-19
| sourcery
Posted on 05/20/2006 7:01:47 PM PDT by sourcery
I think that seeing some of the significant sci/tech developments over the past few months all in one listing gives one a better perspective on the accelerating rate of progress:
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: science
1
posted on
05/20/2006 7:01:48 PM PDT
by
sourcery
To: AntiGuv; bobbyd; DoughtyOne; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; phatoldphart; RightOnTheLeftCoast; ..
2
posted on
05/20/2006 7:02:21 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(Political & economic freedom: More important than gays burning flags at their weddings)
To: sourcery
Thanks for collecting the link and the ping.
3
posted on
05/20/2006 7:09:01 PM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
To: sourcery
Thanks for collecting the link and the ping.
4
posted on
05/20/2006 7:09:13 PM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
To: sourcery
The article on microbial fuel cells was very promising. This may end up being a good way to process coal, tar sands, and oil shale.
To: sourcery
Thanks S. I'd better take a look to see if any potential GGG topics are in there.
6
posted on
05/20/2006 7:30:59 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: sourcery
7
posted on
05/20/2006 7:46:38 PM PDT
by
underbyte
To: sourcery
I'd gladly ping my list except I'm travelling on business and don't have the list with me. I'll do it on Monday though.
8
posted on
05/20/2006 8:28:22 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(How is Mexico our friend?)
To: underbyte
The Singularity is Near The only question is how God will handle it when the divide-by-zero exception occurs.
< ]B^)
9
posted on
05/20/2006 10:22:51 PM PDT
by
Erasmus
("Peace on you!" -- Imam Ofo)
To: underbyte; AntiGuv; SunkenCiv
10
posted on
05/20/2006 10:39:17 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(Political & economic freedom: More important than gays burning flags at their weddings)
To: sourcery
11
posted on
05/20/2006 10:41:34 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: sourcery
12
posted on
05/20/2006 11:03:09 PM PDT
by
Thumper1960
(Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
To: All; Mojave
13
posted on
05/20/2006 11:05:34 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(Political & economic freedom: More important than gays burning flags at their weddings)
To: sourcery
14
posted on
05/21/2006 12:02:30 AM PDT
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: sourcery
15
posted on
05/21/2006 12:50:19 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Political & economic freedom: More important than gays burning flags at their weddings)
To: Erasmus
To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
FutureTechPing! |
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop. |
|
|
|
17
posted on
05/22/2006 11:27:48 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: sourcery
"Until now, it was not known if the industry could continue to adapt this optical immersion technique to produce sharp features smaller than 32 nanometers. New materials required to make such small features were thought to be incompatible with each other or capable of yielding only indistinct, blurred patterns. As a result, in recent years contingency plans are being explored for switching sometime in the future to a radically different but much more expensive and still unproven -- manufacturing method that uses soft-x-rays (also known as EUV, for extreme ultraviolet light)"
Interestingly, in the book by the guy who used to be the CEO of Intel (Moore, I think) he described an incident decades ago now (I believe it was that long ago) when the claim was being made that photolithography had reached its limit and it would be necessary to switch to X-rays to keep making chips smaller.
There was no sure answer to the question one way or the other. If this idea was right, and Intel's stuck with photolithography, they could be caught in a technological squeeze, a little like Kodak was. The problem was, making the shift to X-rays would have been incredibly expensive. If the idea was wrong, Intel might be destroyed due to wasting such a large amount of money.
In the event, Moore decided not to switch to X-ray technology. He guessed right.
18
posted on
05/22/2006 1:03:47 PM PDT
by
strategofr
(H-mentor:"pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it"Hillary's Secret War,Poe,p.198)
To: sourcery
19
posted on
05/22/2006 1:04:12 PM PDT
by
strategofr
(H-mentor:"pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it"Hillary's Secret War,Poe,p.198)
To: sourcery
20
posted on
05/22/2006 8:06:10 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds...)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson