Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B-1B strikes Taliban stronghold
Air Force Link ^ | 5/19/2006 | AFPN Staff

Posted on 05/19/2006 2:58:54 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

5/19/2006 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFPN) -- A B-1B Lancer struck a Taliban-associated compound May 17 near Kandahar, Afghanistan, in support of coalition ground forces conducting operations to detain individuals suspected of terrorist activities.

The bomber responded to an immediate air support request with a GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munition, destroying the compound from which the Taliban members were attacking. Coalition ground forces reported approximately 15 to 20 Taliban were killed from the air strike.

These individuals were active members of the Taliban network and conducted attacks against coalition and Afghan forces. Additionally, they conducted attacks against Afghan government officials and are suspected of constructing improvised explosive devices and training other enemy fighters.

This was the first use of a JDAM by a B-1B in a combat environment. The Air Force recently added a new software package to the bomber that allows it to carry and deliver this guided weapon. The JDAM, a 500-pound bomb, is a precision weapon that allows warfighters to focus their strikes and minimize collateral damage.

“With the new software package and this precision weapon, we can target and eliminate the terrorist threat in close quarters,” said Maj. Gen. Allen Peck, deputy Combined Forces Air Component commander for U.S. Central Command. “We’re able to better support our coalition ground forces,” he said “and significantly reduce the possibility of civilian casualties.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: b1; b1b; diegogarcia; gbu38; jdam; lancer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
That's gonna leave a mark.
1 posted on 05/19/2006 2:58:55 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

That's the kind of headline that makes me feel warm and fuzzy.


2 posted on 05/19/2006 3:00:44 PM PDT by lormand (Michael Savage - The "turd in the punch bowl" of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

A thing of beauty is a joy forever.

3 posted on 05/19/2006 3:02:55 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Governor of California, another job Americans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
A magnificent looking aircraft.

Am I wrong or does it seem that the B-1 is under utilized in relation the B-52?

Payload capability perhaps?

4 posted on 05/19/2006 3:04:57 PM PDT by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
This was the first use of a JDAM by a B-1B in a combat environment.

Tax dollars well spent.


5 posted on 05/19/2006 3:05:57 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


6 posted on 05/19/2006 3:06:38 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Payload capability perhaps?

70,000 lbs for the B-52, 75,000 (+ potential 52,000 external) for the B1B. I think they just get tasked differently.

7 posted on 05/19/2006 3:09:27 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Governor of California, another job Americans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Am I wrong or does it seem that the B-1 is under utilized in relation the B-52?

Payload capability perhaps?

Can't be that. B-1 payload is much greater than that of B-52, according to a thread on the subject yesterday (or maybe Wednesday).

Maybe B-1 missions just don't get talked about as much. They're a hell of a lot faster than B-52s, have nap-of-the-earth guidance systems, are smaller. Maybe fewer people see them coming and going.

8 posted on 05/19/2006 3:09:58 PM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Payload capability perhaps?

Perhaps, for when the B 52 is mentioned on page F13 of any local newspaper, those who have experienced it's capabilities "duck and cover"!

9 posted on 05/19/2006 3:10:54 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Payload capability perhaps?

No.


10 posted on 05/19/2006 3:11:49 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Me too, Excuse_My.

Mmmm. I love the smell of J-DAMS in the morning. Hmm. In the evening too, now that I think of it.

God Bless our troops and god bless our technology. Do you think those Taliwackers even knew what hit them?

Cheers - Dinah


11 posted on 05/19/2006 3:14:02 PM PDT by Dinah Lord (fighting the Islamic Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Omar" Do you hear anything?"
Mohammed, "No, do you?"
JDAM HITS
BIG BOOM!
SILENCE
24 DEAD TALIBAN.
AMEN!


12 posted on 05/19/2006 3:18:13 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I think they just get tasked differently.

Well placed synopsis.

Conventionally, the B-52 reign's superior during a nuclear clash the B1 is well suited to perform admirably.

13 posted on 05/19/2006 3:19:05 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
That's really a good looking aircraft. It seems like a vast overkill for dropping a single 500 lbs bomb on the bad guys with no air defenses.
14 posted on 05/19/2006 3:19:23 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
It seems like a vast overkill for dropping a single 500 lbs bomb on the bad guys with no air defenses.

Never give a sucker an even break ;-)

15 posted on 05/19/2006 3:25:17 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Twenty years in the Navy. Never drunk on duty - never sober on liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

He was the closest to target when the call came in. Luck of the draw I assume.


16 posted on 05/19/2006 3:28:23 PM PDT by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

I love the smell of fried terrorists in the morning!!


17 posted on 05/19/2006 3:30:12 PM PDT by Enchante (General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Maybe the "Wedding Party" was getting a bit loud.
18 posted on 05/19/2006 3:30:15 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill
I should've included that Wedding Party is codename for Taliban Stronghold.
19 posted on 05/19/2006 3:31:46 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

From the Reuters news service:

"Sadly, it was reported that several JDAM's went off target and mistakenly took out all nuclear production sites of the peaceful nation of Iran. In addition, one errant JDAM destroyed the house of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who did not survive the blast. U.S. Central Command regrets this unfortunate incident and will perform a thorough investigation.

At a joint press conference, both Minority House Leader Nancy Pelosi and Minority Senate Leader Harry Reid expressed outrage at the accidental bombing, saying that their only consolation was the the facilities that produce the yellow and blue badges that the evil Jews and Christians are required to wear were left intact. At Sen. Reid's request, Rep. John Murtha translated the transcript of the press conference in Spanish to Sen. Reid's staff."


20 posted on 05/19/2006 3:39:12 PM PDT by texasmountainman (Remember the heroic men and women of Flight 93-go watch United 93.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson