Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush on Immigration (A Man that Delivers on what he Says)
issues2000 ^ | 2006(updated) | issues 2000

Posted on 05/19/2006 2:53:23 PM PDT by catholicfreeper

George W. Bush on Immigration President of the United States, Former Republican Governor (TX)

Our economy could not function without the immigrants We hear claims that immigrants are somehow bad for the economy, even though this economy could not function without them. All these are forms of economic retreat, and they lead in the same direction, toward a stagnant and second-rate economy. Source: 2006 State of the Union Address Jan 31, 2006

Support a humane guest-worker program that rejects amnesty Keeping America competitive requires an immigration system that upholds our laws, reflects our values and serves the interests of our economy. Our nation needs orderly and secure borders. To meet this goal, we must have stronger immigration enforcement and border protection. And we must have a rational, humane guest-worker program that rejects amnesty, allows temporary jobs for people who seek them legally and reduces smuggling and crime at the border. Source: 2006 State of the Union Address Jan 31, 2006

It's time to permit temporary guest workers America's immigration system is outdated, unsuited to the needs of our economy and to the values of our country. We should not be content with laws that punish hardworking people and deny businesses willing workers and invite chaos at our border. It is time for an immigration policy that permits temporary guest workers to fill jobs Americans will not take, that rejects amnesty, that tells us who is entering and leaving our country, and that closes the border to drug dealers and terrorists. Source: 2005 State of the Union Speech Feb 2, 2005

Temporary workers ok, but no amnesty Q: What should we do about the 8,000 people cross our borders illegally every day? BUSH: We're increasing the border security of the US. There ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer, so long as there's not an American willing to do that job, to join up. I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. If they want to become a citizen, they can stand in line, too. And here is where my opponent and I differ. In September 2003, he supported amnesty for illegal aliens.

KERRY: We need a guest-worker program. We need is to crack down on illegal hiring. And thirdly, we need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

Source: Third Bush-Kerry Debate, in Tempe Arizona Oct 13, 2004

A time-limited worker card for the illegal immigrants Q: At least 8,000 people cross our borders illegally every day. How do you see it? And what do we need to do about it? A: We're increasing the border security of the US. We've got 1,000 more Border Patrol agents on the southern border. We're using new equipment. We're using unmanned vehicles to spot people coming across. We'll continue to do so over the next four years. They're coming here to work. In order to take pressure off the borders, in order to make the borders more secure, there ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer to mate up, so long as there's not an American willing to do that job, to join up in order to be able to fulfill the employers' needs. It makes sure that the people coming across the border are humanely treated, that they're not kept in the shadows of our society, that they're able to go back and forth to see their families. The card it'll have a period of time attached to it. It also means it takes pressure off the border.

Source: Third Bush-Kerry debate, in Tempe AZ Oct 13, 2004

Don't believe we ought to have amnesty BUSH: I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line. If they want to become a citizen, they can stand in line, too. Kerry supported amnesty for illegal aliens. KERRY: The borders are more leaking today than they were before 9/11. We haven't done what we need to do to toughen up our borders, and I will. We need a guest-worker program, but if it's all we have, it's not going to solve the problem. We need to crack down on illegal hiring. It's against the law in the US to hire people illegally, and we ought to be enforcing that law properly. We need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

Source: Third Bush-Kerry debate, in Tempe AZ Oct 13, 2004

Support temporary worker program but oppose amnesty I ask Congress to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy. I propose a new temporary-worker program to match willing foreign workers with willing employers when no Americans can be found to fill the job. This reform will be good for our economy, because employers will find needed workers in an honest and orderly system. A temporary-worker program will help protect our homeland, allowing border patrol and law enforcement to focus on true threats to our national security. I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary-worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

Source: 2004 State of the Union address to joint session of Congress Jan 20, 2004

New temporary worker program includes illegal aliens President Bush, saying the nation has failed millions of illegal immigrants who live in fear of deportation, yesterday proposed an ambitious plan that would allow undocumented workers to legally hold jobs in the US for the first time. The program that would bestow temporary legal status for at least 6 years on 8 million undocumented immigrants, as long as they keep their jobs. But it would not automatically put them on a path to obtaining citizenship or even permanent resident status. "We must make our immigration laws more rational, and more humane," Bush told 200 Latino supporters attending his first White House announcement of the election year. "I believe we can do so without jeopardizing the livelihoods of American citizens." What Bush calls his "temporary worker" program was eagerly embraced by business groups but condemned as stingy and impractical by advocates for immigrants. Many said it has little chance of passing Congress in the form Bush described.

Source: Mike Allen, Washington Post, p. A1 Jan 8, 2004

Mexico: immigration reform in exchange for oil development Bush envisioned a Mexican border open to labor, to trade, and open to investment-especially investment in energy. Mexico had banned foreign investment in its energy industry in 1938, and ever since, Mexican oil production has been controlled by the creaky, corrupt, and polluting state monopoly, Pemex. If Mexico opened itself to the exploration and development of its oil resources by American entrepreneurs & technology, Mexican oil might possibly displace Arab oil from the US market altogether. For this energy "quid," Mexico would of course demand some equally valuable "quo"-and in Bush's mind that "quo" was immigration reform. Bush believed that immigration was valuable to the US and praised it again and again in public speeches and his private conversations.

So the Bush administration designed a system for regularizing the Mexican-US labor relationship-not an amnesty like that of 1986, but a grander system for enabling Mexicans to work in the US temporarily and then to go home again.

Source: The Right Man, by David Frum, p. 84-85 Jun 1, 2003

Respect other languages, but teach all children English Q: Should English be made the country’s official language? A: The ability to speak English is the key to success in America. I support a concept I call English-plus, insisting on English proficiency but recognizing the invaluable richness that other languages and cultures brings to our nation of immigrants. In Texas, the Spanish language enhances and helps define our state’s history. My fundamental priority is results. Whether a school uses an immersion program or a bilingual program, whichever effectively teaches children to read and comprehend English as quickly as possible, I will support. The standard is English literacy and the goal is equal opportunity - all in an atmosphere where every heritage is respected and celebrated.

Source: Associated Press Nov 1, 2000

$500M to cut INS application time to 6 months Expanding on a proposal to improve the INS, Bush pledged $500 million in new spending yesterday to cut the time needed to process an immigration application to an average of six months. Bush said the process now takes three to five years. Late last year, the INS announced that average times had been reduced from two years to 12 months, and were headed lower. ’’We will bring to the INS a new standard of service and a culture of respect,’’ Bush said. The new spending, to be doled out over five years, is the latest part of an INS overhaul plan that Bush’s campaign believes will resonate with Latino voters. ‘’We’ve got an INS that is too bureaucratic, too stuck in the past,’’ he said.

Last week, Bush announced that he wants to split the INS into two agencies: one for legitimate immigrants and one for border enforcement. He also proposed allowing relatives of permanent residents to visit the US while their own immigration papers are being processed.

Source: Paul Shepard, Associated Press, in Boston Globe, page A12 Jul 6, 2000

Welcome Latinos; immigration is not a problem to be solved Latinos come to the US to seek the same dreams that have inspired millions of others: they want a better life for their children. Family values do not stop at the Rio Grande. Latinos enrich our country with faith in God, a strong ethic of work, community & responsibility. We can all learn from the strength, solidarity, & values of Latinos. Immigration is not a problem to be solved, it is the sign of a successful nation. New Americans are to be welcomed as neighbors and not to be feared as strangers. Source: Speech in Washington, D.C. Jun 26, 2000

Make INS more “immigrant friendly” Bush [would] divide the INS into two agencies: one to deal with the enforcement components of border protection and interior enforcement, and another to deal with the service components of naturalization. Bush will change the INS policy so that spouses & minor children of permanent residents can apply for visitor visas while their immigration applications are pending. He will reverse the presumption that such family members will violate their terms of admission, and will encourage family reunification. Source: Speech in Washington, D.C. Jun 26, 2000

High tech: More H-1B worker visas; less export controls Supports meaningful, broad-based tort reform to protect our most innovative companies from frivolous and junk lawsuits Supports lifting the current limit on H-1B visas; believes long term solution to the shortage of high tech workers is education Called for reforming the high tech export control system by allowing American companies to sell products in the international marketplace when these products are readily available in foreign or mass markets Source: GeorgeWBush.com: ‘Issues: Policy Points Overview’ Apr 2, 2000

Farm policy: Open markets abroad; more H-2A worker visas Calls upon European Union to abide by the rules of the World Trade Organization and allow importation of genetically modified farm products Would work aggressively to open markets for U.S. products and producers Supports reviewing and expanding the H-2A temporary agriculture workers program so that willing workers can provide much needed help to America’s farmers Source: GeorgeWBush.com: ‘Issues: Policy Points Overview’ Apr 2, 2000

Latinos enrich us; family values go past Rio Grande Latinos have come to the US to seek the same dreams that have inspired millions of others: they want a better life for their children. Family values do not stop at the Rio Grande River. Latinos enrich our country with faith in God, a strong ethic of work and community and responsibility. Immigration is not a problem to be solved; it is the sign of a successful nation. New Americans are not to be feared as strangers; they are to be welcomed as neighbors. Source: Reforming the INS, in “Renewing America’s Purpose” Feb 9, 2000

More border guards to compassionately turn away Mexicans We must do a better job of stopping those who seek to come into our country illegally. I support strict border enforcement programs such as Operation Hold the Line, which concentrate border patrol officers and resources at known border-crossing points. I believe it is far more compassionate to turn away people at the border than to attempt to find and arrest them once they are living in our country illegally. Source: “A Charge to Keep”, p.237. Dec 9, 1999

Guest workers, maybe; citizenship waiting period, yes Bush pledged to revisit guest worker programs and other ways for immigrants to come into the country, but said he would insist on immigration controls and a waiting period before citizenship. Source: Mike Glover, Associated Press Aug 6, 1999


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushbots; guestworker; koolait; lovefest; promises; rationalization; sellout; slavelabor; temporaryworker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: catholicfreeper

So the bottom line is?


41 posted on 05/19/2006 3:38:53 PM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Under the BUsh plan they have a ton of qualifications and basically have to wait 11 years even then.

How knuckleheaded is that?

In order for illegals to come out ahead, they would have to pay $2,000 precious dollars, pay all back taxes (how will the government staff that office?) and start paying taxes. Those are the incentives to citizenship.

There is no disincentive for staying illegal! Stay under the radar and you pay nothing, but neither is there a penalty, that I can see, for staying illegal and leaving things status quo. It's ridiculous. It's wrong-headed. It's pandering.

42 posted on 05/19/2006 3:40:44 PM PDT by Glenn (Annoy a BushBot...Think for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

The bottomline is that Bush was talking about a program for workers here and also something to deal with future Mexican workers and I suppose else where that wanted to work.

For instance in the Debate "We need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows."

That means to me that people who are here now. Versus a work program that gives temp work for a period of time that would be ongoing but would not have a citizenship path by itself. HE envisioned both


43 posted on 05/19/2006 3:43:56 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

LOL !


44 posted on 05/19/2006 3:44:51 PM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Immigration Explosion Act of 2006. No to 100 million new aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

I got to imagine that the carrot will be if you don't participate your not going to be a citizen. Plus if you don't sign up then your out of here no if and's or buts.


45 posted on 05/19/2006 3:45:09 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Plus if you don't sign up then your out of here no if and's or buts.

Show me.

46 posted on 05/19/2006 3:47:01 PM PDT by Glenn (Annoy a BushBot...Think for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

He wants one hemisphere, free trade, and travel a la the EU. That's it in a nutshell, and the thinking in DC is that a few potholes in the road to the paradise of One Hemisphere are to be expected. Loss of sovereignty, culture,language, betrayal of the US citizenry, rampant drug trade, gangs, violence, burden of educating, feeding, tending everyone in the world being just a few. You know what they say about the road to hell? Bush's good intentions and big business's greed have paved the way. This will never work because, among other things, they never took into account other cultures, mores, etc.. And nobody seemed to care that we were inventing a new slave class. Immoral? Illegal? Unethical? Who cares. It's for the common good. Sound familiar?

They tried to shove NAFTA, etc. down the southern hemisphere's throat and it didn't work. So import the whole bunch up here willy nilly, turn them all into Americans. They kept the full plan more or less under wraps because the other countries would be insulted. It's not pleasant to read in the papers that you're a third world country, which they are. So rather than have an honest dialogue with the US voters, he chose up sides and we lost. There's nothing more dangerous than a fanatic, and for Bush and his pals in the CFR, that's what this is, a belief that borders on fanaticism. The dems have other aims in mind, but intend to go down the same road. Only faster.


47 posted on 05/19/2006 3:47:34 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
I knew Bush wasn't going to be as tough on illegals as I wanted him to be.

I even figgered he might have a soft spot for em.

But I had no idea granting them amnesty would be the single most important issue for him outside the WOT and that he would pursue such a policy with such dogged determination and to the detriment of his entire party.

48 posted on 05/19/2006 3:51:39 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
I'm kinda old so you're going to have to give a a Yes or No answer.
Did Dubya ever use the words "path to citizenship" during his campaign?
49 posted on 05/19/2006 3:52:57 PM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Thanks to some statements by the Bishops, I no longer attend Mass, and will never donate any money or valuables to anything with a Catholic label.

I hope you find a nice non-denominational christian congregation to be part of. One that sticks to the scriptures and leaves politics out of the chapel.

50 posted on 05/19/2006 3:55:05 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
The turn from the fig leaf of "temporary" to outright "path to citizenship" is a change in the Presidents amnesty schemes.

It would be significant, except that no ever believed the temporary nonsense in the first place.

If illegal aliens aren't being compelled to leave now, why would they ever be compelled to do so later after their "temporary" period? Who would make them? President Bush?

51 posted on 05/19/2006 3:56:56 PM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Immigration Explosion Act of 2006. No to 100 million new aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Bush knew he was going to be asked in the debates in Arizona about immigration. The voters were watching in a tight election. He had a prepared answer. This was his one unique opportunity to directly tell the American people what he intended to do. Here he could expound on his plans to legalize 12 million illegal aliens, to provide them a path to citizenship. Kerry mentions legal status directly, in terms eerily prescient of what Bush is saying today.

So.....

Show us where in this transcript Bush says he is going to give permanent legal status and eventual citizenship to the illegals

If you cannot show us, then maybe Bush isn't the straight-shooter your vanity purports.

    Schieffer: Let's go to a new question, Mr. President.

    I got more e-mail this week on this question than any other question. And it is about immigration.

    I'm told that at least 8,000 people cross our borders illegally every day. Some people believe this is a security issue, as you know. Some believe it's an economic issue. Some see it as a human-rights issue.

    How do you see it? And what we need to do about it?

    Bush: I see it as a serious problem. I see it as a security issue, I see it as an economic issue, and I see it as a human-rights issue.

    We're increasing the border security of the United States. We've got 1,000 more Border Patrol agents on the southern border.

    We're using new equipment. We're using unmanned vehicles to spot people coming across.

    And we'll continue to do so over the next four years. It's a subject I'm very familiar with. After all, I was a border governor for a while.

    Many people are coming to this country for economic reasons. They're coming here to work. If you can make 50 cents in the heart of Mexico, for example, or make $5 here in America, $5.15, you're going to come here if you're worth your salt, if you want to put food on the table for your families. And that's what's happening.

    And so in order to take pressure off the borders, in order to make the borders more secure, I believe there ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer to mate up, so long as there's not an American willing to do that job, to join up in order to be able to fulfill the employers' needs.

    That has the benefit of making sure our employers aren't breaking the law as they try to fill their workforce needs. It makes sure that the people coming across the border are humanely treated, that they're not kept in the shadows of our society, that they're able to go back and forth to see their families. See, the card, it'll have a period of time attached to it.

    It also means it takes pressure off the border. If somebody is coming here to work with a card, it means they're not going to have to sneak across the border. It means our border patrol will be more likely to be able to focus on doing their job.

    Now, it's very important for our citizens to also know that I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line.

    Bush: If they want to become a citizen, they can stand in line, too.

    And here is where my opponent and I differ. In September 2003, he supported amnesty for illegal aliens.

    Schieffer: Time's up.

    Senator?

    Kerry: Let me just answer one part of the last question quickly, and then I'll come to immigration.

    The American middle class family isn't making it right now, Bob. And what the president said about the tax cuts has been wiped out by the increase in health care, the increase in gasoline, the increase in tuitions, the increase in prescription drugs.

    The fact is, the take home pay of a typical American family as a share of national income is lower than it's been since 1929. And the take home pay of the richest .1 percent of Americans is the highest it's been since 1928.

    Under President Bush, the middle class has seen their tax burden go up and the wealthiest's tax burden has gone down. Now that's wrong.

    Now with respect to immigration reform, the president broke his promise on immigration reform. He said he would reform it. Four years later he is now promising another plan.

    Here's what I'll do: Number one, the borders are more leaking today than they were before 9/11. The fact is, we haven't done what we need to do to toughen up our borders, and I will.

    Secondly, we need a guest-worker program, but if it's all we have, it's not going to solve the problem.

    The second thing we need is to crack down on illegal hiring. It's against the law in the United States to hire people illegally, and we ought to be enforcing that law properly.

    And thirdly, we need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

    Schieffer: Do you want to respond, Mr. President?

    Bush: Well, to say that the borders are not as protected as they were prior to September the 11th shows he doesn't know the borders. They're much better protected today than they were when I was the governor of Texas.

    We have much more manpower and much more equipment there.

    He just doesn't understand how the borders work, evidently, to say that. That is an outrageous claim.

    And we'll continue to protect our borders. We're continuing to increase manpower and equipment.

    Schieffer: Senator?

    Kerry: Four thousand people a day are coming across the border.

    The fact is that we now have people from the Middle East, allegedly, coming across the border.

    And we're not doing what we ought to do in terms of the technology. We have iris-identification technology. We have thumbprint, fingerprint technology today. We can know who the people are, that they're really the people they say they are when the cross the border.

    We could speed it up. There are huge delays.

    The fact is our borders are not as secure as they ought to be, and I'll make them secure.

    Schieffer: Next question to you, Senator Kerry.

52 posted on 05/19/2006 3:57:31 PM PDT by Plutarch (Trading amnesty for border security will yield neither an end to amnesties nor border security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
a pathway to citizenship to 12 million lawbreakers.

If these people have lived among us for years and their only crime was to sneak into the country, then I am able to give them the benefit of the doubt and give them a path to citizenship.

We already grant good behavior time-off for criminals, we grant homestead privileges to homeowners, we grant right of redemption to homeowners, we grant amnesty to citizens through the Statutue of Limitations, etc.

I'm sure you broke the law while driving at one time or another. Should you ever be allowed to drive once you have been given a speeding ticket? That's about the equivalent punishment for crossing the border illegally. A free meal and a bus ride home.

Now if you want to make the case that crossing that border is on the same par as murder, rape, and armed robbery then perhaps you are right and all illegals should be rounded up like Elian Gonzales at gunpoint. But don't forget that under our Constitution, each and every one of the 12 million will need a court date to plead their case. So if we can dispense justice at one minute per case it will only take about 96 years to clear the backlog. Good luck with that.

53 posted on 05/19/2006 3:58:11 PM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Had the democRATs fielded a reasonable candidate in 2000 or 2004, Dubya would not be President now. Fortunately, I can't think of any candidate from the left that could be considered "reasonable".

I knew that Dubya wasn't the best for the job, but he was certainly the best in the running. Unfortunately, the dilution of our national sovereignty is one of his desires.

54 posted on 05/19/2006 3:59:48 PM PDT by meyer (Permanently boycott all businesses that close for the May 1st illegal alien march!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Well I have to think thats going to be part of a bill in the final form


55 posted on 05/19/2006 4:00:10 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hershey

"They tried to shove NAFTA, etc. down the southern hemisphere's throat and it didn't work. So import the whole bunch up here willy nilly, turn them all into Americans. They kept the full plan more or less under wraps because the other countries would be insulted. It's not pleasant to read in the papers that you're a third world country, which they are. So rather than have an honest dialogue with the US voters, he chose up sides and we lost. There's nothing more dangerous than a fanatic, and for Bush and his pals in the CFR, that's what this is, a belief that borders on fanaticism. The dems have other aims in mind, but intend to go down the same road. Only faster"



Now do you really think George Bush really believes this. This makes as much sense as all the MAsonic stuff thats been on the history channel. Bush is a Patroit.


56 posted on 05/19/2006 4:03:09 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander
If these people have lived among us for years and their only crime was to sneak into the country, then I am able to give them the benefit of the doubt and give them a path to citizenship.

This thread isn't about whether illegals deserve amnesty or not (they don't).

It is about whether George Bush is consistent about his plans for amnesty.

I say that Bush mislead the voters in the 2004 debates because he stated he was in favor of a temporary guest worker card. Now he favors "a path to citizenship", and is using the words of KERRY in the debate.

Please review the transcript I just posted. Where does he say he is going to legalize 12 million illegals?

57 posted on 05/19/2006 4:05:02 PM PDT by Plutarch (Trading amnesty for border security will yield neither an end to amnesties nor border security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

Actually, there was a Path to Citizenship discussed at the third Bush-Kerry debate:
We need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

OF course these comments listed are not all the comments made on the issue. I suspect there is more


58 posted on 05/19/2006 4:07:12 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
Now, it's very important for our citizens to also know that I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line.

There's nothing in the Senate's proposal (so far) which requires that any of the 12-15 million currently here have to go home & 'get in line'. If the president signs it without such a requirement I suppose we can legitimately accuse him of knowingly telling a falsehood.

59 posted on 05/19/2006 4:07:31 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
We have a President that sticks to his word. Thats something to be promoted not bashed.

Is this going to be the latest spin on why we shouldn't be upset by Bush's love of amnesty? Sorry, sticking to your word is not inherently honorable when you're leading the nation toward darkness.

60 posted on 05/19/2006 4:07:51 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson