Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush on Immigration (A Man that Delivers on what he Says)
issues2000 ^ | 2006(updated) | issues 2000

Posted on 05/19/2006 2:53:23 PM PDT by catholicfreeper

George W. Bush on Immigration President of the United States, Former Republican Governor (TX)

Our economy could not function without the immigrants We hear claims that immigrants are somehow bad for the economy, even though this economy could not function without them. All these are forms of economic retreat, and they lead in the same direction, toward a stagnant and second-rate economy. Source: 2006 State of the Union Address Jan 31, 2006

Support a humane guest-worker program that rejects amnesty Keeping America competitive requires an immigration system that upholds our laws, reflects our values and serves the interests of our economy. Our nation needs orderly and secure borders. To meet this goal, we must have stronger immigration enforcement and border protection. And we must have a rational, humane guest-worker program that rejects amnesty, allows temporary jobs for people who seek them legally and reduces smuggling and crime at the border. Source: 2006 State of the Union Address Jan 31, 2006

It's time to permit temporary guest workers America's immigration system is outdated, unsuited to the needs of our economy and to the values of our country. We should not be content with laws that punish hardworking people and deny businesses willing workers and invite chaos at our border. It is time for an immigration policy that permits temporary guest workers to fill jobs Americans will not take, that rejects amnesty, that tells us who is entering and leaving our country, and that closes the border to drug dealers and terrorists. Source: 2005 State of the Union Speech Feb 2, 2005

Temporary workers ok, but no amnesty Q: What should we do about the 8,000 people cross our borders illegally every day? BUSH: We're increasing the border security of the US. There ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer, so long as there's not an American willing to do that job, to join up. I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. If they want to become a citizen, they can stand in line, too. And here is where my opponent and I differ. In September 2003, he supported amnesty for illegal aliens.

KERRY: We need a guest-worker program. We need is to crack down on illegal hiring. And thirdly, we need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

Source: Third Bush-Kerry Debate, in Tempe Arizona Oct 13, 2004

A time-limited worker card for the illegal immigrants Q: At least 8,000 people cross our borders illegally every day. How do you see it? And what do we need to do about it? A: We're increasing the border security of the US. We've got 1,000 more Border Patrol agents on the southern border. We're using new equipment. We're using unmanned vehicles to spot people coming across. We'll continue to do so over the next four years. They're coming here to work. In order to take pressure off the borders, in order to make the borders more secure, there ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer to mate up, so long as there's not an American willing to do that job, to join up in order to be able to fulfill the employers' needs. It makes sure that the people coming across the border are humanely treated, that they're not kept in the shadows of our society, that they're able to go back and forth to see their families. The card it'll have a period of time attached to it. It also means it takes pressure off the border.

Source: Third Bush-Kerry debate, in Tempe AZ Oct 13, 2004

Don't believe we ought to have amnesty BUSH: I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line. If they want to become a citizen, they can stand in line, too. Kerry supported amnesty for illegal aliens. KERRY: The borders are more leaking today than they were before 9/11. We haven't done what we need to do to toughen up our borders, and I will. We need a guest-worker program, but if it's all we have, it's not going to solve the problem. We need to crack down on illegal hiring. It's against the law in the US to hire people illegally, and we ought to be enforcing that law properly. We need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

Source: Third Bush-Kerry debate, in Tempe AZ Oct 13, 2004

Support temporary worker program but oppose amnesty I ask Congress to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy. I propose a new temporary-worker program to match willing foreign workers with willing employers when no Americans can be found to fill the job. This reform will be good for our economy, because employers will find needed workers in an honest and orderly system. A temporary-worker program will help protect our homeland, allowing border patrol and law enforcement to focus on true threats to our national security. I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary-worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

Source: 2004 State of the Union address to joint session of Congress Jan 20, 2004

New temporary worker program includes illegal aliens President Bush, saying the nation has failed millions of illegal immigrants who live in fear of deportation, yesterday proposed an ambitious plan that would allow undocumented workers to legally hold jobs in the US for the first time. The program that would bestow temporary legal status for at least 6 years on 8 million undocumented immigrants, as long as they keep their jobs. But it would not automatically put them on a path to obtaining citizenship or even permanent resident status. "We must make our immigration laws more rational, and more humane," Bush told 200 Latino supporters attending his first White House announcement of the election year. "I believe we can do so without jeopardizing the livelihoods of American citizens." What Bush calls his "temporary worker" program was eagerly embraced by business groups but condemned as stingy and impractical by advocates for immigrants. Many said it has little chance of passing Congress in the form Bush described.

Source: Mike Allen, Washington Post, p. A1 Jan 8, 2004

Mexico: immigration reform in exchange for oil development Bush envisioned a Mexican border open to labor, to trade, and open to investment-especially investment in energy. Mexico had banned foreign investment in its energy industry in 1938, and ever since, Mexican oil production has been controlled by the creaky, corrupt, and polluting state monopoly, Pemex. If Mexico opened itself to the exploration and development of its oil resources by American entrepreneurs & technology, Mexican oil might possibly displace Arab oil from the US market altogether. For this energy "quid," Mexico would of course demand some equally valuable "quo"-and in Bush's mind that "quo" was immigration reform. Bush believed that immigration was valuable to the US and praised it again and again in public speeches and his private conversations.

So the Bush administration designed a system for regularizing the Mexican-US labor relationship-not an amnesty like that of 1986, but a grander system for enabling Mexicans to work in the US temporarily and then to go home again.

Source: The Right Man, by David Frum, p. 84-85 Jun 1, 2003

Respect other languages, but teach all children English Q: Should English be made the country’s official language? A: The ability to speak English is the key to success in America. I support a concept I call English-plus, insisting on English proficiency but recognizing the invaluable richness that other languages and cultures brings to our nation of immigrants. In Texas, the Spanish language enhances and helps define our state’s history. My fundamental priority is results. Whether a school uses an immersion program or a bilingual program, whichever effectively teaches children to read and comprehend English as quickly as possible, I will support. The standard is English literacy and the goal is equal opportunity - all in an atmosphere where every heritage is respected and celebrated.

Source: Associated Press Nov 1, 2000

$500M to cut INS application time to 6 months Expanding on a proposal to improve the INS, Bush pledged $500 million in new spending yesterday to cut the time needed to process an immigration application to an average of six months. Bush said the process now takes three to five years. Late last year, the INS announced that average times had been reduced from two years to 12 months, and were headed lower. ’’We will bring to the INS a new standard of service and a culture of respect,’’ Bush said. The new spending, to be doled out over five years, is the latest part of an INS overhaul plan that Bush’s campaign believes will resonate with Latino voters. ‘’We’ve got an INS that is too bureaucratic, too stuck in the past,’’ he said.

Last week, Bush announced that he wants to split the INS into two agencies: one for legitimate immigrants and one for border enforcement. He also proposed allowing relatives of permanent residents to visit the US while their own immigration papers are being processed.

Source: Paul Shepard, Associated Press, in Boston Globe, page A12 Jul 6, 2000

Welcome Latinos; immigration is not a problem to be solved Latinos come to the US to seek the same dreams that have inspired millions of others: they want a better life for their children. Family values do not stop at the Rio Grande. Latinos enrich our country with faith in God, a strong ethic of work, community & responsibility. We can all learn from the strength, solidarity, & values of Latinos. Immigration is not a problem to be solved, it is the sign of a successful nation. New Americans are to be welcomed as neighbors and not to be feared as strangers. Source: Speech in Washington, D.C. Jun 26, 2000

Make INS more “immigrant friendly” Bush [would] divide the INS into two agencies: one to deal with the enforcement components of border protection and interior enforcement, and another to deal with the service components of naturalization. Bush will change the INS policy so that spouses & minor children of permanent residents can apply for visitor visas while their immigration applications are pending. He will reverse the presumption that such family members will violate their terms of admission, and will encourage family reunification. Source: Speech in Washington, D.C. Jun 26, 2000

High tech: More H-1B worker visas; less export controls Supports meaningful, broad-based tort reform to protect our most innovative companies from frivolous and junk lawsuits Supports lifting the current limit on H-1B visas; believes long term solution to the shortage of high tech workers is education Called for reforming the high tech export control system by allowing American companies to sell products in the international marketplace when these products are readily available in foreign or mass markets Source: GeorgeWBush.com: ‘Issues: Policy Points Overview’ Apr 2, 2000

Farm policy: Open markets abroad; more H-2A worker visas Calls upon European Union to abide by the rules of the World Trade Organization and allow importation of genetically modified farm products Would work aggressively to open markets for U.S. products and producers Supports reviewing and expanding the H-2A temporary agriculture workers program so that willing workers can provide much needed help to America’s farmers Source: GeorgeWBush.com: ‘Issues: Policy Points Overview’ Apr 2, 2000

Latinos enrich us; family values go past Rio Grande Latinos have come to the US to seek the same dreams that have inspired millions of others: they want a better life for their children. Family values do not stop at the Rio Grande River. Latinos enrich our country with faith in God, a strong ethic of work and community and responsibility. Immigration is not a problem to be solved; it is the sign of a successful nation. New Americans are not to be feared as strangers; they are to be welcomed as neighbors. Source: Reforming the INS, in “Renewing America’s Purpose” Feb 9, 2000

More border guards to compassionately turn away Mexicans We must do a better job of stopping those who seek to come into our country illegally. I support strict border enforcement programs such as Operation Hold the Line, which concentrate border patrol officers and resources at known border-crossing points. I believe it is far more compassionate to turn away people at the border than to attempt to find and arrest them once they are living in our country illegally. Source: “A Charge to Keep”, p.237. Dec 9, 1999

Guest workers, maybe; citizenship waiting period, yes Bush pledged to revisit guest worker programs and other ways for immigrants to come into the country, but said he would insist on immigration controls and a waiting period before citizenship. Source: Mike Glover, Associated Press Aug 6, 1999


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushbots; guestworker; koolait; lovefest; promises; rationalization; sellout; slavelabor; temporaryworker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: catholicfreeper

You are right, George Bush made clear in his words that he was no conservative. And so his current passion for pushing his "comprehensive" immigration reform is not a betrayal of his conservative pricipals because he has no conservative principals.


21 posted on 05/19/2006 3:20:09 PM PDT by shempy (EABOF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
The Harriet Miers argument is really not a good one because she is not the first SC nominee that went through that type of rebellion then withdrawal but it seems as though President Bush is the only one that no one will give a break to on that issue.

You are so right.

Nobody knows crap about Meirs. She may have turned out better than anyone would have guessed. Presidents almost always regret their SC appointments but so far Bush 41 and GWB have had the best records of appointing good people.

22 posted on 05/19/2006 3:20:19 PM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

Actually the above post comments on that. I have to admit I can see confusion. For whatever reason this issue had not hit the hot burner during the electionlike it has now so the press was not aggressive.

Guest workers, maybe; citizenship waiting period, yes Bush pledged to revisit guest worker programs and other ways for immigrants to come into the country, but said he would insist on immigration controls and a waiting period before citizenship. Source: Mike Glover, Associated Press Aug 6, 1999

The program that would bestow temporary legal status for at least 6 years on 8 million undocumented immigrants, as long as they keep their jobs. But it would not automatically put them on a path to obtaining citizenship or even permanent resident status. "We must make our immigration laws more rational, and more humane," Bush told 200 Latino supporters attending his first White House announcement of the election year. "I believe we can do so without jeopardizing the livelihoods of American citizens." What Bush calls his "temporary worker" program was eagerly embraced by business groups but condemned as stingy and impractical by advocates for immigrants. Many said it has little chance of passing Congress in the form Bush described.

Source: Mike Allen, Washington Post, p. A1 Jan 8, 2004

Well the rest of quotes are above. Kerry During the Democrat primary and I think there is a link on the main page to his views stated that he
would

""Amnesty to anyone here over 5 or 6 years Q: Would you support legalizing undocumented immigrants in this country? KERRY: Absolutely. I supported and was prepared to vote for amnesty from 1986. And it is essential to have immigration reform. Anyone who has been in this country for five or six years, who's paid their taxes, who has stayed out of trouble, ought to be able to translate into an American citizenship immediately, not waiting.

Source: Democratic Primary Debate, Albuquerque New Mexico Sep 4, 2003 "

Now when Bush say that Kerry is support amnesty this what he is referring too that is "Anyone who has been in this country for five or six years, who's paid their taxes, who has stayed out of trouble, ought to be able to translate into an American citizenship immediately, not waiting.


23 posted on 05/19/2006 3:21:27 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

Sticking to your word is one thing, but when the fellow you made the bargain with is sticking a large shiv in your ribs, it's time to face reality. Worse, this open borders, lying to the American public, failure to protect borders and US sovereignty is both illegal and unconstitutional. When the dems take over, don't be surprised when they include failure to protect US sovereignty as one of the high crimes. It's hardly a misdemeanour.


24 posted on 05/19/2006 3:21:28 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL

Put succinctly...bingo.


25 posted on 05/19/2006 3:22:22 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Heard Senator Sessions and wished we could clone him.


26 posted on 05/19/2006 3:23:05 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
From the Bush Kerry 2004 Tempe Debate:

There ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer to mate up... the card it'll have a period of time attached to it.

Now President Bush wants to give a permanent Green Card and a pathway to citizenship to 12 million lawbreakers. When he was trying to get our vote he stressed temporary, now it is permanent.

Sounds like a change in tune to me.

27 posted on 05/19/2006 3:23:24 PM PDT by Plutarch (Trading amnesty for border security will yield neither an end to amnesties nor border security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shempy

Well I think his proposal does not violate conservative principles. However, I know many agree with you. But I have to think that the 90 percent of what he said on other issues is pretty conservative regardless of ones viewpoint on illegal immigration.


28 posted on 05/19/2006 3:23:32 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
It's a bully tactic. Everyone knew where he stood before getting elected and then reelected but now some think that they can bully him to go against his original positions

It's a dirty trick for a politician to actually do what he campaigns on. I't unprecedented.

29 posted on 05/19/2006 3:23:37 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Now, there are jobs out there that Americans won't do.

Name three.

L

30 posted on 05/19/2006 3:23:58 PM PDT by Lurker (Real conservatives oppose the Presidents immigration proposal. Help make sure it dies in the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: umgud

I respect him and his honesty, I may not agree with him but I definitely respect a man who stands by his convictions.


31 posted on 05/19/2006 3:24:52 PM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A. and the Troops who protect her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

He doesn't get a break on the Miers matter because she was blatantly not the type of nominee (and not to mention embarassingly unqualified) on which he had demonstrably campaigned and therefore she was opposed. As for the immigration issue, few here that I have observed are claiming that the President's amnesty program is any type of surprise. We were well aware of it in 2000 and 2004 but held our noses and voted for him anyway, with full intent of opposing the program whenever it came up for a vote, as we are now doing and as is our right, at least for now.


32 posted on 05/19/2006 3:28:12 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

Thanks to Bush, and his stand on "Immigration", I am no longer registered Republican (Now Independent)

Thanks to some statements by the Bishops, I no longer attend Mass, and will never donate any money or valuables to anything with a Catholic label.

You perople are STUPID! You only have to look at Mexico to see what your position and your "Country" will look like when the Hispanics are in power.

You are a lot like the Liberals who pander to the IslamoFascists, not realizing that when the Islamics take over, the Libs are going to be the first to be treated to a public execution.


33 posted on 05/19/2006 3:29:29 PM PDT by radar101 (The two hallmarks of Liberals: Fantasy and Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Actually I'm starting to think it was very very convenient for the son of "read my lips no taxes" to run against a known Moron in 2000 and a known Traitor in 2004.. Like "WE" had no choice.. and we didn't.. Very convenient..

Who is George W. Bush?.. Hes very sneaky I don't like that..
Like a smart John Kerry.

34 posted on 05/19/2006 3:29:41 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper
Actually, there was a Path to Citizenship discussed at the third Bush-Kerry debate:

We need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows.

.

.

.

.

.

Oops....sorry, my bad... That was KERRY

35 posted on 05/19/2006 3:31:11 PM PDT by Plutarch (Trading amnesty for border security will yield neither an end to amnesties nor border security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Let's face it, there are people out there so blinded with anger that their rhetoric has become irrational.

Name one.

Immigration automatically means illegal immigration.

I do not know of a single FReeper or conservative that makes this mistake. This "mistake" is made on purpose by disingenuous racists on the Left (such as the author of this article) who try to say any argument against ILLEGAL immigration is an argument against immigration in general

Guest worker program automatically means amnesty.

Bush's does. If the potential worker doesn't have to go to his/her home country to apply, it is amnesty.

Now, there are jobs out there that Americans won't do.

This is a LIE. I can;t believe anyone on this thread would be so ignorant of Market forces to repeat it. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are completely illiterate about economics and markets. There are jobs American's are unwilling to do at the wages offered, but the market will ensure the wages rise to the point where people will do the work. What do you think we did before the current criminal invasion?

Reasons being that they are too menial, too dangerous or sadly enough, it's easier to get welfare than be forced to go get a job. However, when an employer has a job site to finish, a contract to fulfill or a deadline to make, they will hire the person willing to work

And the potential employer should do so and participate in the open, legal market.

Learn some economics before you make a fool of yourself again.

36 posted on 05/19/2006 3:31:14 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Governor of California, another job Americans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Now, there are jobs out there that Americans won't do.

Name three.

I can only think of two:

1. President of the United States.

2. Director of Homeland Security.

37 posted on 05/19/2006 3:32:11 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

This standing on principle dirty tricks must end.


38 posted on 05/19/2006 3:32:24 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

There is a difference between the two programs. There is a temporary work program that will be ongoing. FOr instance for those after the proposed bill is enacted. Another one allows people here now that meets the qualifications to remain temporary workers but if they desire and meet all the requirements start down this citzenship path.

That what he is alluding to here
" temporary-worker program will help protect our homeland, allowing border patrol and law enforcement to focus on true threats to our national security. I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary-worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life."

I think the problem is that the press never engaged and clarifyed what Bush was talking about at times in these debates. It seems from looking over his viewpoints he seems to have always envisioned a a program that had seperate categories for those here and those who will want to come here in the future just to work. Thats how I read it.


39 posted on 05/19/2006 3:33:00 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Good grief. So your leaving the Catholic Church and the Sacraments because of what a few Bishops said. Trust me the grass will not be greener on the other side. Everyone has political disagreement with their Church. PLease dont leave


40 posted on 05/19/2006 3:37:09 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson