Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scare of the century - (Global warming!)
National Review ^ | June 5, 2006 | Jason Lee Steorts

Posted on 05/19/2006 11:19:17 AM PDT by UnklGene

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2006 11:19:18 AM PDT by UnklGene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Manbearpig...

Excelsoir!
2 posted on 05/19/2006 11:22:03 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene

Bring on that Global warming! Winter in Ohio last just a little too long for me.

I would love a shorter winter.


3 posted on 05/19/2006 11:33:05 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene

*


4 posted on 05/19/2006 11:38:01 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Delicacy, precision, force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Here's the story on polar bears :

The Bear Facts

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature has just put the polar bear on the endangered species list because it is supposedly "facing extinction" -- mainly, it claims, as a result of global warming. But statistics show the polar bear is not facing extinction, not by a long shot.

The polar bear biologist cited by the IUCN correctly states the current population of polar bears to be about 22,000-25,000. But when asked for historical data he responds that this number has not changed much in recent decades. He does not mention the fact that half a century ago there were only about 8,000-10,000 polar bears. That low number was not the result of global warming or even cooling but of overhunting. A subsequent regulation of the hunt solved the problem: the polar bear population started to increase again.

While it is probably not possible to define an ideal number of polar bears that "belong" on the planet, there are indications, both from scientific studies and from traditional Inuit knowledge (called IQ for Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit) that the current number of polar bears is actually high. There are about 20 groups of these animals in the Arctic and the majority of them are thriving. The avalanche of media reports about polar bears in trouble is based on just two of these groups. The recent increase of hunting quota for polar bears in Greenland and Canada would actually indicate that their number is increasing. Inuit I talked to (over the phone) made it clear that this increase is not always good news: Ursus Maritimus can be a nasty fellow. He doesnt kill often, but remains a dangerous animal who can smell human presence over long distances.

The main threat to the polar bear in the eyes of IUCN is global warming. For a minute let's assume that the IUCN doomsday-scenario becomes reality. By 2050 polar bears will have experienced more than a 30 percent population decline. But even then the population would still be bigger than it was 50 years ago.

In the same week the IUCN came out with the polar bear list, Dr. Mitch Taylor, a polar bear biologist from the Eskimo nation Nunavut (four times as big as France, 30,000 inhabitants) wrote in the Toronto Star: "Of the 13 populations of polar bears in Canada, 11 are stable or increasing in number. They are not going extinct, or even appear to be affected at present. This complexity is why so many people find the truth less entertaining than a good story. It is entirely appropriate to be concerned about climate change, but it is just silly to predict the demise of polar bears in 25 years based on media-assisted hysteria."

Source: TCS 5/19/6 - http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=051806J

5 posted on 05/19/2006 11:39:59 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Read Are you a Global Warming Skeptic?
6 posted on 05/19/2006 11:45:49 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene


The only global warming I'm aware of is this administration's devotion to globalism.


7 posted on 05/19/2006 11:48:36 AM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets

I'm serial!


8 posted on 05/19/2006 12:06:45 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I'm still worrying about Y2K.....any minute now my computer will stop working....the traffic lights will go out....elevators will crap out....disaster...DISASTER....headlines at 10:00


9 posted on 05/19/2006 12:18:44 PM PDT by Fred911 (YOU GET WHAT YOU ACCEPT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
If one used a little common sense, one would realize that the Earth has lots of negative feedback mechanisms that stabilize world temperatures, evidence the long history of life on Earth. Temperatures go up, evaporation goes up, cloud cover goes up, sunshine goes down, precipitation increases, temperatures go down. Temps go up, vegetation increases, carbon and water get tied up in wood, etc., humidity, CO2 decrease, temps go down. Temps go up, vertical air circulation increases, higher heat radiation from upper atmosphere, temps go down. There are many other cycles that provide negative feedback in the system that affect the earth, and they have kept temperatures within a livable range.

Something curious has happened in the last 10,000 years - temperatures have gotten more stable. One wonders whether this is the cause or effect of mans' ascent.

Perhaps it is abortion that has led to recent global warming? If such exists.

10 posted on 05/19/2006 12:31:43 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
This whole Global Warming Hoax is designed to drive the United States of America toward Socialism akin to EU countries. Only a statist command economy could centrally control carbon dioxide output on a national and global scale. The UN is being readied to exercise its authority as a world government.
11 posted on 05/19/2006 12:36:36 PM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene

thanks


12 posted on 05/19/2006 12:37:32 PM PDT by larryjohnson (USAF(Ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Scare of the Century

Yup, liberals lie, and they not only lie, but they admit that they are lying. All you have to do is listen to their own words!

"I think if we don't overthrow capitalism, we don't have a chance of saving the world ecologically. I think it is possible to have an ecologically sound society under socialism. I don't think it's possible under capitalism."
--Judi Bari, Earth First! member

"The environmentalist's dream is an egalitarian society, based on rejection of economic growth, a smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally."
--Aaron Wildavsky, political scientist and professor

"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits... [C]limate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
--Christine Stewart, Canadian Environment Minister

"We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists, and their projects... We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers, and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land."
--David Foreman, EarthFirst! member

"We've got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing, in terms of economic policy and environmental policy"
--Timothy Wirth, Clinton Administration U.S. Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs, and one of a number of politicians (including Barbara Boxer, Barney Frank, Al Gore, John Kerry, Christopher Shays, and others) who were designated as "Green Leadership for the '90s."

"[W]e have to offer up scary scenarios [about global warming and destruction of the environment], make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts one might have... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
--Stephen Schneider, Stanford University environmentalist

"We routinely wrote scare stories about the hazards of chemicals, employing words like "cancer," and "birth defects" to splash a little cold water in reporters' faces... Our press reports were more or less true... Few handouts, however, can be completely honest, and ours were no exception... We were out to whip the public into a frenzy about the environment."
--Jim Sibbison, former EPA press officer

"Not only do journalists not have a responsibility to report what skeptical scientists have to say about global warming, they have a responsibility not to report what these scientists say."
--Ross Gelbspan, former editor of The Boston Globe

"I would freely admit that on [global warming] we have crossed the boundary from news reporting to advocacy."
--Charles Alexander, Time magazine science editor

WTF!! "No matter if the science is all phony..."! "We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists..."! "Even if the theory of global warming is wrong..."! "...right balance is between being effective and being honest"!?!

They LIE! The KNOW they are lying! They are PROUD that they are lying.

13 posted on 05/19/2006 12:43:17 PM PDT by hadit2here ("Most men would rather die than think. Many do." - Bertrand Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadit2here

The only place I see TIME anymore is in the waiting room of my dentist.


14 posted on 05/19/2006 1:06:26 PM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fred911

I'm still worrying about Y2K.....

Ha! Thats nothing. My company just put me in charge of Y3K planning. Yes sir, I ll be going places in this forward thinking outfit.


15 posted on 05/19/2006 1:23:49 PM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
"polar bear"

Thanks for posting that info. I have a friend at work, a Republican too, who firmly believes that polar bears are going extinct. He believes all the-global-warming-is-caused-by-humans hysteria also.

16 posted on 05/19/2006 1:56:12 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
I would love a shorter winter.

There's the conundrum: "Global warming means global cooling..."

17 posted on 05/19/2006 1:56:18 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Scare of the century

And it's not even 5.5 years in to this century.

18 posted on 05/19/2006 2:07:43 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadit2here

Thank you for the quotes. I'll be asking some of my liberal relatives if they agree with them.


19 posted on 05/19/2006 2:15:21 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Michael Crichton Is Right!
20 posted on 05/22/2006 7:11:37 PM PDT by A. Pole (Second hand smoking is a major cause of global warming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson