Skip to comments.
Another Government power grab of your rights: Dog Ownership
Responsible Dog Owners of the Western States ^
| Cherie Groves, chairwoman
Posted on 05/18/2006 6:44:12 AM PDT by ventana
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-259 next last
Their coming to take your rights away...V's wife.
1
posted on
05/18/2006 6:44:15 AM PDT
by
ventana
To: ventana
Dogs are property. As such, crimes commited with dogs, and torts involving dogs are the fault of the property owner -- the dog owner.
Beware of people complaining about "bad breeds" and "assault dogs".
2
posted on
05/18/2006 6:48:38 AM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: ventana
Yes, dogs really don't understand. That's why we must take pains whenever a dog kills a human to take the owner out an dexecute him immediately.
It's so rare that I can find anything in these transparent justifications for keeping pit bulls with which I can agree, but there it is.
3
posted on
05/18/2006 6:53:31 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Liberal Classic
Don't I get to cross-examine the dog?
To: Liberal Classic
Society is becoming more and more tolerant of laws which infringe upon the rights of the majority in order to punish the few.
Whether its "dangerous dog breeds", firearms, other types of pets, remote control planes, pre-existing pig farms, etc.
The driving force behind this is, of course, attorneys and self-serving politicians, which are too often synonmous.
5
posted on
05/18/2006 6:55:09 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: ventana
6
posted on
05/18/2006 6:56:02 AM PDT
by
Glenn
(Annoy a BushBot...Think for yourself.)
To: ZULU
Note that, as people have less rights to defend themselves physically, that they come to rely on police and animal control and demand restrictions on dog ownership and the like.
7
posted on
05/18/2006 6:57:09 AM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: Liberal Classic
That's true also.
But the state cannot protect us and is on record as maintaining it has no obligation to do so.
8
posted on
05/18/2006 6:58:28 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: JusticeForAll76
Under granola-style animal emancipation statutes, under which one is a dog's "guardian", I suppose you could hire a dog psychic to find out what was going on inside its head.
9
posted on
05/18/2006 6:59:02 AM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: muawiyah
May I prosecute the owners for letting their dogs poop on my lawn?
10
posted on
05/18/2006 7:00:24 AM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Liberal Classic
To: muawiyah
Re your pitbull comment: Ditto! V's wife.
12
posted on
05/18/2006 7:03:25 AM PDT
by
ventana
To: Glenn
13
posted on
05/18/2006 7:04:33 AM PDT
by
ventana
To: kanawa
14
posted on
05/18/2006 7:05:56 AM PDT
by
rattrap
To: Doctor Stochastic
Hmmm ~ guy used to do that around here ~ use his dogs to poop on lawns.
One day his prize black chow got loose and jumped into the backyard of this older Korean man.
Dog didn't come out.
We have few stray dogs around here.
15
posted on
05/18/2006 7:06:18 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Doctor Stochastic
May I prosecute the owners for letting their dogs poop on my lawn? Absolutely. But the dog owner should have the Right to sue you for payment for the fertilizer.
16
posted on
05/18/2006 7:06:25 AM PDT
by
LPM1888
("If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy")
To: JusticeForAll76
17
posted on
05/18/2006 7:08:08 AM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: muawiyah
Well, the owners need to be punished, and we need to have vicious dog laws with teeth in them (no pun intended...well, maybe it was!). However, I'd be cautious about breed specific laws. First, do you know how many people mistake boxers for pit bulls? What about mixed breeds? It's a conundrum (and don't count on your local animal control officer to be able to tell the difference either).
Personally, the breed that scares me the most is chows. That doesn't mean I think they should be illegal.
Thank goodness I fell in love with golden retrievers and Italian spinoni.
susie
18
posted on
05/18/2006 7:08:21 AM PDT
by
brytlea
(amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
To: ventana
Jet ski's kill people. So do horses, and hang gliders. Rock climbing defaces our parks, as do off road vehicles and snow mobiles. Down hill skiing is unsafe and the rest of us with insurance have to pay for the broken bones. Private or General Aviation is not really needed and very wasteful/polluting. Guns are dangerous and thousands die at the hand of them. Motorcycles are dangerous and cripple thousands each year. Scuba diver damage the coral reefs, mountain bikes the wilderness, campers in our parks leave waste. You should not smoke, and the sun gives you cancer.
There is a wacko out there trying to ban everything and anything. Screw them!
19
posted on
05/18/2006 7:08:36 AM PDT
by
Red6
To: ventana
Responsible dog owner, the rarest breed of all. If only that breed was as common as pit bulls, rotties, chows, etc...
20
posted on
05/18/2006 7:10:59 AM PDT
by
DonGrafico
(Gowd demmit bub! You ain't from around heah ah ya?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-259 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson