Posted on 05/17/2006 10:06:43 PM PDT by freespirited
No, she CLAIMS she was raped by 3 men. She was not.
The lawyers may be on to something here. It needs investigating to see if there has been favoritism or undue influence in her case. If any of us stole a car and tried to run down an officer anywhere in this country, we would either be dead or still making license plates at very cheap wages.
And now for other and related news....
May 17, 2006: Many US women abused by men, study finds (A Lesson in Bias)
*** To get the Nifong Support fully "operational" as a vehicle for "truth to power", gotta allow nearly a year for their engines to get up to snuff.
Gotta build some outrage in order to obscure facts.
Typical liberal show, and Nifong is their guy.
Dems are probably having to tie up Howard Dean to not open his mouth.
The fact that Nifong signed off on a bail reduction as soon as Roberts changed her story has nothing to do with the rape....
The fact that the 2 lead investogators served a 2 year old warrant on a closed case with someone else pleading guilty has nothing to do with the rape.........
/end sarcasm
I could go on & on.
Don't forget that 3 became 4 in the lineup. She picked 4 LAX players out of the lineup.
We need to know for sure who the 4th man was, because he probably is the rumored one who was not even in Durham that night.
If she actually picked a guy that wasn't in Durham, that would be another shotgun blast to her already tattered credibility.
You don't think the credibility of witness, where there is no corroborating evidence, matters?
I wonder how long her probation was. I know someone who got 5 years probation for less serious charges and 1 condition was no alcohol. If she had ended up in detox, that would probably be enough to violate the probation.
Curious and curiouser....
"you could drive an M1 tank through."
Would that be a (Dan) Abrams tank?
Well, maybe she got special treatment 2 years ago, but that doesn't mean she wasn't raped. Only the facts about the Duke case are relevent; her conduct 3 years ago isn't.
Doesn't it goes to her credibility?
Who in their right mind really believes she was raped by anyone on the Duke lacrosse team?
Maybe she was raped. By the "boyfriend."
The "boyfriend's" DNA was the only foreign-source DNA found on the FA. The Nifong-commissioned DNA report indicated that the "boyfriend's" DNA had been freshly deposited "immediately" prior to the rape-kit exam.
Also as evidence for rape, there's that SANE nurse's report -- the one that's been brayed about incessantly by Wendy Murphy and the other talking-head feminazis. It's been quoted as stating findings "consistent with rape..."
However, according to some lawyers I've heard, including commie lawyer Ron Kuby, those words "consistent with _____" are weasel words.
"Consistent with ____" only means "could have happened." Doesn't mean "did happen."
Further, abrasions that are "consistent with rape" may also be:
- consistent with voluntary rough sex; or
- consistent with sex with multiple partners.
The first course in law school has to be in lying.
Bill and Hill are past masters at it. Some law school will pick them up to teach the stuff in future.
Here's hoping that the new details finally all come out and this case goes away.
Further, abrasions that are "consistent with rape" may also be:- consistent with voluntary rough sex; or
- consistent with sex with multiple partners.
You're right. "Consistent with rape" is one of the biggest weasel phrases of all time.
No, but it does call into question the credibility of her accusation when there is no physical evidence of a rape, and one of the defendants whom she positively identified has a time-stamped security photo substantiated alibi.
Not really. If she had a history of purjury or lying to the police, then it would. All I can gather from the above account is that she's a stupid tramp who got drunk and tried to kill a police officer. It doesn't indicate she's a liar.
Not that I'm convinced she was raped. From the evidence available to the public, it doesn't seem likely. Nevertheless, not all evidence has been made public, yet, so it's a little silly to pre-judge this before the trial.
Agree. I watched NG last night to see what she was saying. Good Lord. That woman makes me scream a word that I hate - really really hate. It starts with "C" and rhymes with punt. She had a forensic guy on and asked him about the "tearing" etc. He said just what you did. It could mean rough sex and with a boyfriend. She did not like that answer at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.