Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity
that doesn't mean she wasn't raped

Maybe she was raped. By the "boyfriend."

The "boyfriend's" DNA was the only foreign-source DNA found on the FA. The Nifong-commissioned DNA report indicated that the "boyfriend's" DNA had been freshly deposited "immediately" prior to the rape-kit exam.

Also as evidence for rape, there's that SANE nurse's report -- the one that's been brayed about incessantly by Wendy Murphy and the other talking-head feminazis. It's been quoted as stating findings "consistent with rape..."

However, according to some lawyers I've heard, including commie lawyer Ron Kuby, those words "consistent with _____" are weasel words.

"Consistent with ____" only means "could have happened." Doesn't mean "did happen."

Further, abrasions that are "consistent with rape" may also be:
- consistent with voluntary rough sex; or
- consistent with sex with multiple partners.

54 posted on 05/18/2006 9:23:52 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (Max Boot: Joe Wilson has sold more whoppers than Burger King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: shhrubbery!
Further, abrasions that are "consistent with rape" may also be:

- consistent with voluntary rough sex; or
- consistent with sex with multiple partners.

You're right. "Consistent with rape" is one of the biggest weasel phrases of all time.

57 posted on 05/18/2006 2:03:25 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: shhrubbery!
Maybe she was raped. By the "boyfriend."

Agree. I watched NG last night to see what she was saying. Good Lord. That woman makes me scream a word that I hate - really really hate. It starts with "C" and rhymes with punt. She had a forensic guy on and asked him about the "tearing" etc. He said just what you did. It could mean rough sex and with a boyfriend. She did not like that answer at all.

60 posted on 05/19/2006 9:05:27 AM PDT by gopheraj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: shhrubbery!
The "boyfriend's" DNA was the only foreign-source DNA found on the FA.

I am not sure that is true.

It was the only source that matched what they found.

They tested three men. Could that mean they found three or more different types of DNA in her?

61 posted on 05/19/2006 9:11:13 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: shhrubbery!
The "boyfriend's" DNA was the only foreign-source DNA found on the FA. The Nifong-commissioned DNA report indicated that the "boyfriend's" DNA had been freshly deposited "immediately" prior to the rape-kit exam.

All that proves is that she had sex with her boyfriend at some point before she danced in front to the lacross team. It doesn't rule out the possibility that the lacross boys wore condoms when they raped her. This would not be the first time such a thing happened, you know. These are smart kids; it's very plausible that they took steps to cover their tracks.

Also as evidence for rape, there's that SANE nurse's report -- the one that's been brayed about incessantly by Wendy Murphy and the other talking-head feminazis. It's been quoted as stating findings "consistent with rape..."

I agree, it doesn't prove rape, but it gives reason to suspect it.

The evidnece available to the public now is clearly not sufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she was raped. However, you don't have access to all the evidence. Rational people, unlike you, wait until they see all the evidence before forming an opinion when the evidence they have in front of them is not conclusive either way.

66 posted on 05/19/2006 4:54:15 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson