Posted on 05/13/2006 11:59:45 PM PDT by FreedomCalls
BRITAIN’S most senior policeman Sir Ian Blair is facing a race relations dilemma after the release of figures that reveal almost half the number of people arrested in relation to car crime in London are black. Blair, the Metropolitan police commissioner, has signed off a report by his force’s traffic unit which shows that black people account for 46% of all arrests generated by new automatic numberplate recognition (ANPR) cameras.
The technology allows car registration plates to be scanned and automatically run through databases to determine whether a vehicle is stolen, uninsured or has not had its road tax paid.
Each numberplate is also checked with the police national computer, where vehicles suspected of links to crimes such as robberies are flagged up.
The Met has deployed six mobile ANPR camera units in the capital, primarily in areas with high levels of street crime. When a suspect vehicle is identified, police officers are sent to intercept the driver.
Although ANPR technology is impartial, the disproportionate number of blacks being arrested has prompted the Met to investigate.
The arrests have been broken down by ethnicity in a report sent last month to the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), to which the force is accountable.
It reveals that between April 2005 and January this year the units generated 2,023 arrests. Of these 923 were black suspects, while 738 (36%) came from white backgrounds. Asians accounted for just over 9% of arrests.
The report tacitly appears to address concerns among ethnic minority communities who believe they are unfairly targeted by the police through stop and search powers. Black people are up to six times more likely to be stopped than whites.
The report says: “It is worth stating that out of all our activities, this is the one area where the officer has minimal discretion as they respond to an electronic matching process.”
Last week the Met attempted to explain the high number of arrests among blacks by the fact that they make up a higher proportion of the population in areas such as Southwark and Lewisham in south London, where the ANPR units operate.
However, statistics from the 2001 census show that the highest black population in any borough is no greater than about 25%. The proportion of black people across the capital as a whole is about 11%.
Peter Herbert, an independent member of the MPA and spokesman for the Society of Black Lawyers, said: “The Met really wants to avoid any allegation of disproportionality so they will seek to explain these figures by whatever nuance they can. The targeting of certain boroughs might be justified in terms of some crime, but it’s certainly not justified in terms of all crime.”
Captain Gatso, of Motorists Against Detection, the anti-speed-camera group that uncovered the Met figures, said: “All this does is create a new problem for Sir Ian Blair, the politically correct PC, as ANPR cameras and the databases they are linked to are colour blind.”
It is more than a decade ago that Lord Condon, the former Met commissioner, caused controversy when he suggested that young black men were likely to be responsible for most muggings.
Can a socialist be demagogic?
My first thought upon reading this is that they need more of these automatic recognition cameras to further cut down on crime. The second thought is wondering if someone will someday stand up and go, "Look, you stupid fools, STOP STEALING CARS!"
Not going to hold my breath.
I suppose the cameras can tell when someone is black and send the police after them, right?
They call this unfairly targeting! Lefties are not to be believed, a bigger head in the sand attitude is hard to imagine.
Unfortunately, I am unable to Ebonicate with an "British" accent.
Doesn't that make sense? Next will come the study and the commission.
Depends on whether the camera is photographing Rodney King or Reginald Denny.
Oh, and was the software behind the system outsourced to India?
Cheers!
They are just as racists as school exams, SATs, med school exams, etc.
They obviously need to start putting the cameras in low-crime areas to see if that alleviates some of the disproportion...or is that move going to be considered racist, too?
I wonder what would happen if a racist camera took a picture of an evil SUV (the perpetrators of many accidents). Let's ask Rush Limbaugh.
Hey Mo Fo, old bean!
Let them touch those things...
If Britain had our percentage of minorities, they would have our murder rate as well.
Culture doesn't seem to matter. Draw your own conclusion.
Ali G at the UN...including a Boutros Boutros-Ghali interview
Nice Taiwan pix by the way, I've been there several times
The camera is racist. Product of instututional racism. All whites are racist and blacks don't produce cameras.
Race-norming is needed. 95% of black offenders must be discarded so that the proportion of black/white offense will be politically correct.
The question I'd ask is why is it even necessary to break down arrestees by racial background when the system is targeting number plates that are involved in crimes or road infractions. It would seem to me that if racial balance is the primary objective, then they ought to assign number readers to favored minorities which are programmed to give them a certain number of free passes, such as 10 mph over the speed limit whereas honkies only get 5 mph.
Why explain it????
"Why were 46% of the arrests black? Because that's who was driving the f*&%ing car, genius!!"
Shame on the results not matching the political correctness mantra!
Those racist cameras have to go!
To our British cousins: Check American crime stats.....your's are only out of line to the point that the black numbers may be low.
Dreyfus: "How can an idiot be a policeman?"
Clouseau: "Simple! Enlist."
The truth hurts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.